Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Respectful Cameras

A new type of video surveillance protects the privacy of individuals.

By Brendan Borrell

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

A camera developed by computer scientists at the University of California, Berkeley, would obscure, with an oval, the faces of people who appear on surveillance videos. These so-called respectful cameras, which are still in the research phase, could be used for day-to-day surveillance applications and would allow for the privacy oval to be removed from a given set of footage in the event of an investigation.

Privacy by Design: The “respectful camera” system identifies the individual wearing the marker--the green vest in this image--and protects his identity by placing an oval over his face.
Credit: Respectful Cameras Project, Profs. Ken Goldberg, Deirdre Mulligan, Pam Samuelson, PhD Students: Jeremy Schiff, Marci Meingast, UC Berkeley
Multimedia
•  View a video of the surveillance system in action.
•  View a second video of the surveillance system.

"Cameras are here to stay, and there's no avoiding it," says UC Berkeley computer scientist Ken Goldberg. "Let's figure out new technology to make them less invasive." According to a 2006 report prepared by the New York Civil Liberties Union, the number of publicly and privately owned video cameras in Lower Manhattan increased by a factor of five between 1998 and 2005, and several thousand cameras are in place in Greenwich Village and Soho alone. The United Kingdom, however, holds the record for video surveillance. In a report filed on Tuesday, the information commissioner there estimates that there are four million video-surveillance cameras in the United Kingdom--that's one for every 14 people. Goldberg thinks of the respectful cameras as a compromise between advocates for privacy and those concerned about security.

Story continues below

In its current state of development, the camera is only able to obscure the faces of people who are wearing a marker, in the form of a yellow hat or a green vest. The camera system was developed by the National Science Foundation-funded Team for Research in Ubiquitous Secure Technologies, and it currently works in real time with Panasonic's robotic security cameras operating at 10 frames per second and a resolution of 640-by-480-pixel videos. The researchers use a statistical classification approach called adaptive boosting to train the system to identify the marker in environments with a high degree of visual noise. But they also combined this classifier with a tracker, which takes into account the subject's velocity, along with other interframe information. At a construction site where the researchers tested their camera with the vest, the system correctly identified the marker 93 percent of the time. Under more-uniform lighting conditions in their lab environment, they report 96 percent success at identifying the hat, even when two marked individuals cross paths.

The marker requirement is a trade-off, Goldberg admits, but he says that face-detection algorithms are simply not up to task for real-time operations in complex environments. "The idea is called structuring the environment," he says. "If you're willing to meet the system halfway and say, 'I'll help the computer,' then that's useful." In areas with heavy surveillance, markers could be made available, just outside the camera's view, to those who wish to maintain their privacy. In the future, Goldberg says, it may be possible to use a less conspicuous marker, like a button, particularly with systems of multiple cameras, which would be less susceptible to visual obstructions.

Comments

  • Good One
    I have an idea that will fix the marker problem, just put a removable white box over the entire screen. Face recognition and tracking tech is important but this is a joke. This is a great example of feel good tech, it makes people feel better but in reality does absolutely nothing. The viewer just types in the override password, and it is just an overprices security camera.



    Rate this comment: 12345

    zig158
    05/02/2007
    Posts:64
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Don't alter initial / raw / actual data
    Nice politically correct / privacy technology.

    But only as a *POST* capture processing method.

    The original actual images should be preserved - not altered from the get go, IMHO.

    Potentially crucial evidence needed for bona fide cases could be obscured.  Indeed, vital peripheral info unintentionally lost. Or worse, an error in blotting out relevant info, rather than a face.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    nekote
    05/02/2007
    Posts:132
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Bad Solution to a non problem
    Why waste time on nonsence?
    What probelm are you 'thinking' about?

    Worried about unflatering pictures?

    Worried about being caught in picking your nose?

    There are real problems to address.

    This is not a problem
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Tremain2004
    05/02/2007
    Posts:3
    • Re: Bad Solution to a non problem
      Well, it is not an issue with you. Yet, many examples of why a government's observation of us must be regulated are out there. So I am comfortated that this is being taken seriously, and creatively.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      prigat2
      05/08/2007
      Posts:3
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • torn
    yea... seems like a waste; if the footage was public then maybe, but its not. But you never know; it may affect some other development in the future.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    syntheos
    05/04/2007
    Posts:2
  • Academic Research Welfare
    Yet another feel-good but ultimately corrosive product of Berkeley.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    doppelganger
    05/06/2007
    Posts:1
  • Privacy
    There is no privacy issue just a solution looking for a problem.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    reyn8100
    05/07/2007
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review July/August 2009

Current Issue

Search Me
Inside the launch of Stephen Wolfram’s new “computational knowledge engine.”
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.