Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Is Twitter Here to Stay?

Continued from page 1

By Wade Roush

Friday, April 06, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The company is also grappling with its own sudden growth, says Stone. The unanticipated storm of Twitters has resulted in occasional slowdowns and downtime. "We're looking for a senior engineer experienced at developing large-scale systems," he pleads.

Stone is a longtime collaborator of Blogger cofounder Evan Williams, who owns Twitter's parent company, Obvious. But "obvious" isn't the word some onlookers are using to describe Twitter's utility. While it has some high-profile users, such as presidential candidate John Edwards and former Microsoft blogger Robert Scoble, many bloggers have dismissed Twitter as a giant distraction, full of news flashes about which variety of latte a friend just ordered at Starbucks.

Dedicated Twitter users defend the service, suggesting that the daily minutiae actually add up to something significant. "Asking 'who really cares about that kind of mindless trivia about your day?' misses the whole point of presence," writes Liz Lawley, director of the Lab for Social Computing at Rochester Institute of Technology. "It's about letting the people in your distributed network of family and friends have some sense of where you are and what you're doing. When I travel, the first thing I ask the kids on the phone when I call home is, 'What are you doing?' Not because I really care that much about the show on TV, or the homework they're working on, but because I care about the rhythms and activities of their days."

But Twittering became such a fashionable pastime at TED and at the following week's South by Southwest interactive technology conference in Austin, TX, that other observers wonder whether it is more than a fad. "Twitter was impossible to escape at South by Southwest," says Jamais Cascio, an independent "foresight consultant" and cofounder of futurist news site WorldChanging. "I think it went through the entire hype cycle--from nobody knowing about it to 'What do you mean you don't use it?' to 'Twitter? Do you still have that?'--in about four days."

But at least a few independent Web developers are still enamored with Twitter, and they're using the programming interfaces provided by Obvious to build mashups that give messages more context. If Twitter users send a specially formatted message to the service giving their current location, all their subsequent Twitters will include that information; Maryland-based developer David Troy took advantage of this feed to build Twittermap, which displays each new message above the user's location on a Google Map.

Later, Troy introduced an animated version called Twittervision, which comes as close to embodying the phrase "global conversation" as anything on the Web. The Twittervision screen depicts the entire earth (again, using map data from Google) and slides east and west to highlight the latest geocoded messages from Twitterers around the world. Say you're in Tanzania and you see an interesting Twitter pop up over Tokyo. You can respond via phone or the Web, and within 60 seconds your own Twitter will appear over Africa.

Nat Torkington, a New Zealander who runs open-source conferences for technology publisher O'Reilly Media, comments that Twittervision is "a hypnotic glimpse into the lives of people around the world." He calls it "a complete waste of time"--but "in the same way that conversation, casual sex, and reading are wastes of time."

Comments

  • Twitter: Value-Adding, but not ultimately disruptive.
    All the buzz about twitter tempts me to label it "the next big thing," but I think it will fail to ever get there.

    Twitter is similar to the user "Status" feature on Facebook.  Many features and notifications on Facebook are able to be extended to mobile devices.  Even though Status isn't among that group, it could be.  If Facebook were to extend Status to mobile devices it would duplicate the functionality of Twitter within the context of a more robust social networking platform and give it an instant user group of 18 million people.

    I bring up Facebook because Twitter faces a wall in the adoption curve between early adopters and the early majority.  The appeal of Twitter isn't disruptive enough to convince mainstream technology users to adopt it.  It is limited to the demographic of tech enthusiasts who already use Web 2.0 tools and services.  Besides this group, the only impetus for mainstream technology users to adopt would either be a mandate by an employer or social pressures/incentives at a large event like SXSW.

    Twitter's biggest contribution to the development of social technology will not be its widespread adoption, but rather its demonstration of the value and nuances of persistent presence.  The lessons learned from a case study of Twitter can be applied, implemented, observed in other social platforms already in widespread use like Facebook, Myspace, Wikis, CMS, etc.

    So to answer the question posed in this article's title: No, at least not in its current form.  The principles of Twitter will be absorbed by other platforms, but Twitter will end up a footnote in social tech history.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    johnpublic
    04/18/2007
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.