Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Mobile-Gaming Madness

Would your cell phone be more fun if the industry adopted standards?

By Rachel Ross

Monday, March 05, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

At the Game Developers Conference in San Francisco this week, programmers will discuss the unique challenges posed by portable devices: the screens are small, wireless connections can be flaky, and processing power is limited. But the biggest complaint of many in the industry is the lack of standards.

Phone fun: At the University of Southern California’s GamePipe Labs, students learn about the unique challenges of making games for mobile phones. One USC team developed a game called Battle Boats (above), in which players try to move their ships across the board without hitting mines.
Credit: GamePipe Labs USC School of Engineering

"The mobile-phone environment unfortunately has been driven by the service providers, and they have different demands for what technologies can and can't be used," says Michael Zyda, an engineering professor at the University of Southern California and director of its GamePipe Labs. GamePipe conducts research on video games and teaches students how to program games for portable devices. Zyda says that in order to meet the needs of service providers and phone manufacturers, mobile-game developers have to reconfigure--or port--a given game for several different software environments.

"It's a crazy era, much like the early days of computing, when each manufacturer was making their own operating system and there weren't standards for interoperability," Zyda says. "It's like the Tower of Babel with respect to interoperability."

Christy Wyatt, a vice president at Motorola who coordinates the company's developer program, agrees that the lack of standards can be a problem. "Overwhelmingly, we hear that the major challenge for the game community is platform fragmentation," she says, adding that one developer recently told her he was supporting 500 different platforms. "If you change even a small thing on the platform, it's a whole new test cycle of them."

Hardware differences can also present problems. For example, it's essential that a game player feel comfortable with the physical controls she uses to play a given game, but button placement can be very different from one phone to the next. Some use more-traditional phone dial pads with a couple of additional buttons on the sides, while many smart phones feature a typewriter-style button layout. Touch screens, such as the one on Apple's upcoming iPhone, present even more of a challenge.

Joe Ariganello, senior product manager of games for Sprint Nextel, says developers who make games for the company have to ensure that the software works with a couple dozen of their top phones. If a game is licensed to another wireless carrier as well, then there's even more porting involved because that carrier will likely have different hardware and software configurations. For this reason, some game makers outsource the porting and focus on creating new content.

Zyda believes that the industry should adopt the mobile version of the open-source operating system Linux as a standard to alleviate the porting problem. While there are other open-source platforms for mobile devices, Zyda thinks Linux is the best choice because there are already lots of programmers who are familiar with its intricacies. "It's the only one with a lot of traction," he says.

Comments

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review July/August 2009

Current Issue

Search Me
Inside the launch of Stephen Wolfram’s new “computational knowledge engine.”
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.