Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Cell-Phone Cameras That Zoom

A new design could put the power of a telephoto lens into thin cameras.

By Kate Greene

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

While each generation of mobile-phone camera captures more megapixels, the images still can't match the quality of those taken with stand-alone cameras. The major reason: the lens. In a mobile-phone camera, the embedded lenses are frozen in place, without the ability to physically zoom in on a subject.

This novel lens design has the zooming capabilities of a telephoto lens 40 millimeters long, even though it’s only 5 millimeters thick. The trick is to collect light from the outer edge (the dark ring); reflect it within the lens eight times, using mirrors on the front and in the back; and focus it onto a camera sensor.
Credit: UC San Diego

But now researchers at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD), working with Illinois-based optics company Distant Focus, have developed a new type of lens that could let mobile-phone cameras take close-up shots. Joseph Ford, professor of electrical and computer engineering at UCSD, and his group have developed a five-millimeter-thick lens that has the power of an optical system that is usually 40 millimeters long. The group's novel design collects light and reflects it within the lens to obtain the full 40-millimeter optical path, and then it focuses the light onto the camera's sensor. Ford says the lenses could be used in, in addition to mobile-phone cameras, any situation in which a small and lightweight but powerful camera, from a telescope to a military imaging system, is needed.The research is funded by the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency as part of the "MONTAGE" imager program. 

The research is based on technology called a folded optical system, which can be found in some telescopes today. In these telescopes, a series of separate lenses and mirrors are used to increase the distance that light travels before it reaches the imaging sensor, a distance known as the focal length. Light is collected using a lens at one end, reflected between mirrors, and then focused onto a sensor. The longer the focal length of a system, the larger the final image will appear. Ford's group compressed this idea into a novel thin lens and designed it in such a way that light reflects inside the lens eight times before hitting the sensor.

To do this, the researchers made extreme modifications to a traditional lens. First, they used diamond machining to carve mirror surfaces out of a lens material called calcium fluoride. The mirrors steer the light, altering its path so that all the light converges onto the camera's sensor. Second, they coated both the front and the back of the calcium fluoride with mirrors so that the light reflects inside the lens.The key to making this lens work is precise allignment between the mirrors, which is accomplished by machining them all from a single piece.

The mirror on the front of the lens blocks roughly 90 percent of the light from entering, says Ford, which can reduce the contrast in an image. However, even with so much light blocked, he says, the group's camera was able to perform almost as well as a conventional lens almost ten times as long, producing images that are only slightly less crisp than those created using a traditional camera, in which 100 percent of the light from an image passes through the lens.

Comments

  • Good work but a waste of time
    The answer to good pictures in cellphones is more pixels and digital zoom. The trend in semiconductors including image sensors is to higher density. Using this technology to get a 3:1 zoom is OK, but installing 8 megapixels and using a 3:1 digital zoom will soon be less expensive and better.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dickcaro
    02/06/2007
    Posts:8
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: Good work but a waste of time
      Digital zoom although a cheaper option has some serious drawbacks. Since it uses the image interpolation technology, there is a drastic reduction in image quality. Even the higher resolution cannot address this issue since the actual image layout captured by the image sensors, cannot be regained. Secondly, working with digital zoom makes the images more prone to blurring due to slight movement of the camera while capturing the image.
      Hence this alternate design of the camera lens can offer better solutions to the cell phone industry.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      omarg
      02/07/2007
      Posts:2
      • Re: Good work but a waste of time
        It think the previous comment about using say 8Mpix and digital zoom for 3 X was indicating that without interpolation this woudl lead to a theoretical resolution of 8 /sqrt 3 = 4.7Mpix.

        So very nearly the same resolution as zooming a 5Mpix sensor 3X. But nothing physically moves.
        It woudl not be more prone to hand shake effects than optical zoom, both magnify this.

        However the effect that neither correspondant has mentioned is that smaller pixels collect less light. The low light performance of an 8Mpix sensor in the same optical format as an 5Mpix woudl be worse.

        The same effect would be a problem with the research cited. The fact that 90% of light reflected off the top face may not make the image contrast look poor (although I find this difficult to believe), but it wodl most definitely affect the low light perfromance by a huge margin.

        I don't think it is a waste of time, but there are still problems to solve.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        gaijin
        02/07/2007
        Posts:1
        Avg Rating:
        5/5
        • Re: Good work but a waste of time
          Using x3 digital zoom on an 8Mpixel sensor (3264 x 2448 say) you would get only 1/3^2 of the sensor resolution, so image size 1088 x 816. Zooming in to 4Mpixels only gives you x1.414 not x2, sorry (x2 would only give you a 2Mpixel image). You COULD zoom in further than 1 to 1, but you are not adding any new information, just adding more data points to a smaller and smaller raw image.

          Futher to the point about reduced sensitivity, another effect of the smaller pixel pitch is the lens can't resolve to that level. You could use bigger pixels, but that is more Silicon, more money, longer focal length so larger lens and shorter depth of field. Yet another issue is reduced full well capacity (means the best noise level that can be achieved is limited, the reason why higher and higher pixel count cameras are getting more noisy....).

          My question is, they say optical zoom. This needs a change in the characteristics of the optics, normally achieved by moving one of the lens elements. In this case, how is the 'zoom' actually achieved?

          I have checked this, sorry for any errors (especially spelling!).
          Rate this comment: 12345

          PeterPiper
          02/08/2007
          Posts:1
          Avg Rating:
          3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.