|
Friday, December 01, 2006 What Comes After Web 2.0?Today's primitive prototypes show that a more intelligent Internet is still a long way off. By Wade Roush
Many researchers and entrepreneurs are working on Internet-based knowledge-organizing technologies that stretch traditional definitions of the Web. Lately, some have been calling the technologies "Web 3.0." But really, they're closer to "Web 2.1." Typically, the name Web 2.0 is used by computer programmers to refer to a combination of a) improved communication between people via social-networking technologies, b) improved communication between separate software applications--read "mashups"--via open Web standards for describing and accessing data, and c) improved Web interfaces that mimic the real-time responsiveness of desktop applications within a browser window. To see how these ideas may evolve, and what may emerge after Web 2.0, one need only look to groups such as MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, the World Wide Web Consortium, Amazon.com, and Google. All of these organizations are working for a smarter Web, and some of their prototype implementations are available on the Web for anyone to try. Many of these projects emphasize leveraging the human intelligence already embedded in the Web in the form of data, metadata, and links between data nodes. Others aim to recruit live humans and apply their intelligence to tasks computers can't handle. But none are ready for prime time. The first category of projects is related to the Semantic Web, a vision for a smarter Web laid out in the late 1990s by World Wide Web creator Tim Berners-Lee. The vision calls for enriching every piece of data on the Web with metadata conveying its meaning. In theory, this added context would help Web-based software applications use the data more appropriately. My current Web calendar, for example, knows very little about me, except that I have appointments today at 8:30 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. A Semantic Web calendar would not only know my name, but would also have a store of standardized metadata about me, such as "lives in: Las Vegas," "born in: 1967," "likes to eat: Thai food," "belongs to: Stonewall Democrats," and "favorite TV show: Battlestar Galactica." It could then function much more like a human secretary. If I were trying to set up the next Stonewall Democrats meeting, it could sift through the calendars of other members and find a time when we're all free. Or if I asked the calendar to find me a companionable lunch date, it could scan public metadata about the friends, and friends of friends, in my social network, looking for someone who lives nearby, is of a similar age, and appreciates Asian food and sci-fi. Alas, there's no such technology yet, partly because of the gargantuan effort that would be required to tag all the Web's data with metadata, and partly because there's no agreement on the right format for metadata itself. But several projects are moving in this direction, including FOAF, short for Friend of a Friend. FOAF files, first designed in 2000 by British software developers Libby Miller and Dan Brickley, are brief personal descriptions written in a standard computer language called the Resource Description Framework (RDF); they contain information such as a person's name, nicknames, e-mail address, homepage URL, and photo links, as well as the names of the people that person knows. I generated my own FOAF file this week using the simple forms at a free site called Foaf-a-matic and uploaded it to my blog site. In theory, other people using FOAF-enabled search software such as FOAF Explorer, or "identity hub" websites such as People Aggregator, will now be able to find me more easily. Eventually, more may be possible. For example, I could instantly create a network of friends on a new social-networking service simply by importing my FOAF file. But for now, there aren't a lot of ways to put your FOAF file to work. Another project attempting to extract more meaning from the Web is Piggy Bank, a joint effort by MIT's Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT Libraries, and the World Wide Web Consortium. Piggy Bank's goal is to lift chunks of important information in data-heavy websites from their surroundings, so that Web surfers can make use of these info chunks in new ways. For example, office address information extracted from LinkedIn, a professional networking site, could be fed into Google Maps, creating a map of my colleagues' places of business.
|
Audio »
Share »
Digg this
Add to del.icio.us
Add to Reddit
Add to Facebook
Slashdot It!
Stumble It!
Add to Newsvine
Add to Connotea
Add to CiteUlike
Add to Furl
Googlize this
Add to Rojo
Add to MyWeb
Favorite
Print
E-mail
IBM to Release Mashup Software
01/23/2008
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Comments
grausc01 on 12/01/2006 at 9:37 AM
12
hosro59@comcast.net on 12/01/2006 at 11:54 AM
6
personal data files, as well as subject data we are interested in?
I would like that there be protection of personal data. But, there seems to be as much genious subverting any protection as there is developed.
Would a Web 2.0 or 3.0 be one that would have a means to include or exclude commercial data, ads?
lund1967 on 12/01/2006 at 1:05 PM
5
rckthms62 on 12/04/2006 at 2:13 PM
1
rjstone on 12/01/2006 at 1:29 PM
2
jorge.jsf on 12/01/2006 at 5:29 PM
1
http://www.google.com/search?q=piggy%20bank%20firefox%20extension
Wonderkid on 12/01/2006 at 3:11 PM
2
dtiffany on 12/03/2006 at 3:20 PM
1
cullin on 12/03/2006 at 4:52 PM
1
As I read this passage I looked up to the tabs along the top of my browser and noticed I still had FaceBook.com open ... and it occured to me that a similar set of factoids is already stored in my FaceBook profile (see http://humber.facebook.com/profile.php?id=507133544) ... To wit: "lives in: Mississauga," "born in: 1967," "likes to eat: Italian food," "favorite TV show: The Daily Show," and political views: "Libertarian".
More to the point FaceBook already allows for the type of social searching that Wade wishes his calendar was capable of. For instance with one click on my profile I was able to determine the names of 357 people within the Toronto sub grouping of FaceBook who share my interest in the band Rush.
As I thought about Wade's argument I started to imaging the fusion between FaceBook's profile comparison engine and Google Calendar. As I thought about it more it occurs to me that among the biggest deficiencies of the Google Apps suite is the lack of a FOAF (Friend of a Friend) capability. And yet in the tab adjacent to my Gmail window sits FaceBook ... almost screaming "Buy me! Merge my capabilities with yours!"
Piggy Bank is an interesting idea. But unless FireFox 2.1 ships with the extension preloaded it is little more then another geek tool.
I guess my point in posting this message is this: Google - consider buying FaceBook.com ... and to Mark Zuckerberg (founder of FaceBook) - The price you extract for FaceBook is just the first phase in your road to riches. Which begs the question Mark: Who can leverage (and monetize) the full power of FaceBook over the next 20 years - Google, Yahoo or Microsoft? Put another way: How much would $1 billion in Google stock be worth 20 years from now? How much would $1 billion in Yahoo stock be worth 20 years from now? How much would $1 billion in Microsoft stock be worth 20 years from now?
vikrant.goswami on 12/04/2006 at 1:22 AM
1
Web 2.0 technologies is being used extensively by knowledge management solution vendors like Kanisa (bought over long time market leaders in Service Resolution Management space i.e. Serviceware), not known as Knova software. With companies like Ontoprise and Cerebra raising huge VC funding and projecting web 2.0 as enabling EAI platform it sure has gret potential. Not to add that giants like Oracle have integrated Web 2.0 i.e. RDF capabilities and inferencing into Oracle 10g Spatial DB suites. Thus web 2.0 is slowly but surely making inroads into the industry. Not to mention that Google dabbles into Semantic web Look at
http://blogs.smh.com.au/mashup/archives//004396.html
Web 2.0 technologies would allow automatic creationg of meta-data from existing repositories with no meta-data .
Not sure how long it would somebody take the untrusted environment (heard of Semantic mediation to bride the meta-data gap between two representations of the same domain) of the internet to come up with a commercially viable solutions.....
But with such movement in the industry, Web 2.0 is sure to break in into Internet , sooner than later
kgilpin on 06/11/2007 at 2:53 PM
1
Curbside.MD http://www.curbside.md is a medical search engine that makes extensive use of concept recognition and tagging.