Eight Tips for the "Microsoft iPod" TeamApple may have an 80 percent share of the mobile media-player market, but that doesn't mean the iPod is unassailable.
With the exception of the Xbox and a line of PC keyboards and mice, Microsoft has largely kept out of the hardware business. According to reports published last week, however, the company plans to take on Apple and other gadget makers directly, launching its own Microsoft-branded media player in time for the Christmas holiday shopping season. Reviving rumors circulating since a Reuters report in mid-June, entertainment industry executives privy to Microsoft's plans told the New York Times last week that the Microsoft media player will have a larger screen than the industry-leading Apple iPod, and will download data wirelessly using a built-in Wi-Fi chip. Microsoft is reported to be in negotiations with recording studios and television networks to sell music and videos tailored for the device through an Internet site similar to Apple's iTunes Music Store. Microsoft told the BBC on July 7 that talk of a Microsoft rival for the iPod amounted to "rumors and speculation." But the company didn't directly deny that a portable media player is in the works, merely saying it had nothing to announce on the subject. If the rumors are true, the project underscores a gradual strategy shift underway at Microsoft, as it adapts to an era in which more and more digital content is being delivered to devices other than PCs. Those devices need software too, creating a new market Microsoft isn't willing to cede to competitors -- as its investment in mobile-phone operating systems and other alternatives to its bread-and-butter desktop software products shows. By building its own media player -- Lance Ulanoff of PC Magazine has cleverly christened it the "MiPod" -- Microsoft could solidify its place in the era of mobile digital content, and would no longer need to rely on manufacturing partners to design and market devices using Microsoft code. But any company entering the media-player market must contend with the iPod. Apple rivals such as Creative Technologies, Samsung, and iRiver offer devices with comparable capabilities, but have barely dented the iPod's 80 percent market share. Microsoft, meanwhile, has a mixed record in the hardware business. The Xbox 360, for example, has wooed many advanced gamers away from Sony's PlayStation 2 -- but it has yet to turn a profit, thanks in part to high manufacturing costs. And Microsoft lacks Apple's marketing savvy and cult following, especially among youth. Can Microsoft hope to produce a real iPod killer? Many observers are skeptical. Yet Microsoft has enjoyed a number of come-from-behind victories. If product developers in Redmond have studied the mobile-media market closely and learned from Apple's successes (and failures), the MiPod has a chance of becoming a credible rival to the iPod. There are a few specific steps Microsoft could take to help the MiPod gain a foothold -- though it may already be too late, if the company is really aiming for a year-end release. 1. Keep It Simple. A case in point is the Motorola Q, a new smart phone designed by the same team that built the highly popular Razr. The phone is winning praise for its thin form factor, convenient keyboard, and high voice quality. But it is being faulted for its needlessly complicated software interface, which depends on Windows Mobile 5.0. Microsoft engineers are doubtless under pressure to build the MiPod around either some permutation of Windows or the company's existing Windows Media Player software. But the appeal of the most successful handheld gadgets lies partly in the fact that they aren't as fussy and complex as PCs or desktop software. Microsoft should start from scratch.
|









Comments
"Apple controls an entire mobile media ecosystem, from the copy-protected AAC format of the original music and video files... It doesn't have to share its revenues with anyone except the record labels and TV networks that create the content."
Apple does have to licence it's use of the industry standard Mpeg4 format. If MS used it's own proprietary media formats, they would have the advantage of avoiding standard licensing fees, while increasing their own licensing income from gadget makers using MS media formats. Apple doesn't have this luxury. They don't own Mpeg4.
"Wi-Fi transmits data faster than USB or FireWire"
Firewire speed is 400Mbps and 800Mbps. The fastest WiFi is about 70Mbps, isn't it?
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/11/2006
Posts:1
A. Wi-Fi is not faster than USB 2.0 or Firewire
B. itunes lets you convert to many different file formats, including standard mp3
C. iTunes music store and the itunes software are incredibly easy to use, even all my computer illiterate employees have and use an ipod.
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/12/2006
Posts:1
07/11/2006
Posts:1
wi-fi is too slow at the moment. where do I get these new excellent batteries? MS needs to invent them too.
07/11/2006
Posts:1
1. Scrolling through thousands of artists on a 30 or 60GB ipod takes forever with that stupid wheel.
2. Allow me to create playlists on the fly. Don't make me spend hours at my computer creating playlists.
Oh, and compete with the ridiculously low cost of the iPod for the storage. That's the only reason I bought the product from apple. Seems like they've got to be subsidizing the hardware.
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/14/2006
Posts:1
2. It's a LOT easier and faster to make playlists with the computer. You complained about the scrolling. To make a on-the-fly playlist, you'd have to scroll through each artist's albums & songs, go back up the menu, find another artist, etc. It would probably take at least 50 times as long to do on the fly.
However, the iPod ALREADY HAS THAT FEATURE. It's called "on-the-go" playlists. Get the PDF manual and read about it. It helps to do a bit of research before shooting oneself in the foot.
07/28/2006
Posts:1
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/11/2006
Posts:1
Also, I think iTunes is a horrible program. It's slow and cumbersome and its mp3 tags are not standard...you rate a song in itunes and it doesn't follow accross library's.
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/13/2006
Posts:1
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/12/2006
Posts:1
07/13/2006
Posts:1
07/11/2006
Posts:1
- Provide a published API at the hardware connector level to allow 3rd party devices to connect to it and interact better (done too exclusively w/ a few car stereo manufacturers today, but their are many other applications I can think of that I'd love to see)
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/13/2006
Posts:1
1. "And Microsoft lacks Apple's marketing savvy and cult following, especially among youth."
Apple has sold 40MM+ iPods. It is not because of a cult following
2. " Yet Microsoft has enjoyed a number of come-from-behind victories. "
Yes, but they were largely the result of using their monopoly status to force their product on people (thus that little anti-trust conviction).
3. "Keep It Simple."
Microsoft has never shown the ability to keep it simple. They have always prescribed to the 10+1 strategy. And the 1 is usually pretty bad.
4. "the iTunes Music Store, is far more confusing to navigate than true retail websites such as Amazon"
> 1 billion songs sold with that crappy ui!
07/11/2006
Posts:1
I was not aware that wifi is that ubiqitous. This has the makings of another Tablet PC.
6. "Be Less Paranoid about Sharing"
That is a RIAA issue and less a retail issue. Maybe RIAA can break Apple's back by giving permission or MS will dole out cash at a loss to facilitate this. Unlikely.
I think this needs to better thought out. Merely wishing that MS take this market will not work
07/11/2006
Posts:1
07/12/2006
Posts:1
07/12/2006
Posts:1
07/13/2006
Posts:1
07/13/2006
Posts:1
07/13/2006
Posts:1
08/01/2006
Posts:1
08/07/2006
Posts:1
Apple neve really understood that.
08/08/2006
Posts:1