|
Friday, May 26, 2006 Cloaking BreakthroughNew materials are on the U.S. Department of Defense's radar. By Duncan Graham-Rowe
Ever since H. G. Wells published The Invisible Man more than a century ago, the prospect of invisibility -- or cloaking -- has been a mainstay of science fiction. But now physicists say they have finally figured out how to make objects invisible, and what's more, they are just months away from putting this theory into practice. The trick is to find a way to guide light and other types of electromagnetic radiation around an object so that it casts no shadow and produces no reflection. Normally, this kind of manipulation would be a tall order, says John Pendry of Imperial College London, England. But, he adds, the recent development of a new class of materials called "metamaterials" makes it tantalizingly feasible. Metamaterials are engineered materials whose properties are determined by their physical structure rather than their chemistry, says Pendry. Such properties include the ability to bend light, he says. Now working with David Smith and David Schurig of Duke University, Pendry has formulated a way to design metamaterials that can bend light around an object no matter what direction the light is coming from. "You can apply it to any shape," says Smith. This means that in theory, anything could be cloaked, he says. Building on Pendry's work, which is described in the current issue of Science, Smith and Schurig are developing a proof-of-principle device, with funding from the U.S. Department of Defense's research arm, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. "It's fair to say that this year there will be a demonstration on the basic physics of cloaking," says Schurig. The cloaking effect depends on a material's "refractive index," or its ability to influence the direction of light that passes through it. Light tends to prefer the quickest route between two points, which is normally a straight line. With metamaterials, however, the quickest path can be one that bends around an object. But bending light is just one of the requirements for cloaking. "You have to return the light to the same path it was pursuing before it hit the cloak; otherwise it casts a shadow," says Pendry. Similarly, when light enters the cloak, it must not be reflected. "One way to think about it is that this material gives the appearance of being like space," says Smith, in that space can bend light and also has no reflection. "It's a breakthrough," says George Eleftheriades, an expert in metamaterials at the University of Toronto. However, he says, there is a limitation: "It won't work for every frequency." Indeed current materials are capable of redirecting only microwaves, which means the cloaking device Smith and Schurig are developing will work only against radar or other microwave emitters. While this is likely to prove useful for future stealth planes, we are still at least a decade away from cloaking objects from visible light. |

Comments
Guest (Nauman) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Slpgdragon) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
I think i am going to build my next home OFF PLANET, and get away from this ignorance.
Guest (George) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
If one always looks at the "dark side" of things, why bother getting up in the morning?
Everyone has the capability and the will to either do good or do evil. Most of life's greatest inventions and tools suffered from the same doom & gloom you are professing. An obvious sample would be nuclear power. It is marvelously benevolent source of power yet in the hands of those with evel designs... Does anyone really believe that there is somewhere someone who is trustworthy enough? Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
I for one, will not stick my head in the sand and curse the darkness. Lets see what wonders man can produce and apply to humanity's betterment.
Guest (The invisible cyberspace man) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (kevin) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Brian) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Remmon) on 05/29/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Weight is a major issue in space, at least untill we can start mining asteroids, this technology could easy save a massive amount of weight.
Guest (German) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (nanana) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (kitk) on 05/27/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Aymeric) on 05/31/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
ZeroGeined on 10/31/2007 at 1:53 AM
1
Guest (Shawn) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (dts) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
<a href="http://www.jobs.co.in">dts</a>
Guest (A1228D) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (mytonytiger) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Bill) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (German) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (jsd) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Skeptic) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
mtone on 04/11/2007 at 1:36 PM
1
Mr_Phil on 04/11/2007 at 3:17 PM
1
Guest (Dan) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (HUSKSTANG) on 05/27/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Sean) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Peiman) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
I have difficulty understanding the logic here, isn't the speed of light constant? So did light warped around the object or the space warped? The base of this theory is that light frame remains constant and the speed close to the sphere reaches infinity. Perhaps the analogy of water stream is more accurate as the speed remains constant but the light could flow on the surface of the object. If it is just a matter of passing through a material well glass, plastic and many other see through materials already do that, what is the big idea here?
Guest (Rich) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Hope this helps. Cheers, rb
Guest on 05/28/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Mason) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
What annoys me is that Pendry gets published in Science for saying, basically, "hey here's this cool idea that COULD work, but I don't have any actual experimental work to support it." Great. If only we were all so lucky.
Guest (HUSKSTANG) on 05/27/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (hymy) on 05/28/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Norman) on 05/27/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (tommy) on 05/27/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (bob) on 05/27/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (HUSKSTANG) on 05/29/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Andrew) on 05/28/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Myopic Cyclopse) on 05/29/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Remmon) on 05/29/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Nauman) on 05/29/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (German) on 05/30/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (ddb) on 05/30/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (John Hewitt) on 05/29/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Sounds great, when you have perfected the technology and are ready for something challenging, I could always use some smart help designing my human powered flying apparatus and getting it to market quicker.