Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Sensors Without Batteries

In the future, the environment could be pervaded by sensors using the same power-scavenging techniques as RFID tags.

By Kate Greene

Monday, May 15, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Some technologists believe that in the future, seemingly invisible computers will be embedded everywhere, collecting data about the environment and making it useful to decision makers. One way to achieve this sort of ubiquitous computing is to disperse tiny sensors that measure, for instance, light, temperature, or motion.

But without a persistent power source, such sensors would need their batteries replaced every few months. In other words, ubiquitous sensors could also mean "ubiquitous dead batteries," says Josh Smith, a researcher at Intel Research in Seattle.

Smith and his team are addressing this problem not by working on longer-lasting batteries but by trying to eliminate the need for batteries altogether. Instead, their prototype devices employ the same power-scavenging technique used by battery-free radio frequency identification (RFID) tags.

The concept of throwing out the sensor battery is not new. Researchers have proposed capturing energy from environmental vibrations or ambient light to power a sensor (see "Free Electricity from Nano Generators"). But it is unclear whether technology that captures ambient energy can be inexpensively integrated into a sensing device.

By contrast, the technology used in RFID tags, which transmit a few bits of information when scanned by an RFID reader, is cheap enough to integrate into sensors and be mass produced; they're already widely used to track livestock and cargo, as well as cars passing through "easy pass" lanes on highways.

Smith explains that Intel's sensor devices use off-the-shelf components: an antenna to send and receive data and collect energy from a reader, and a sensor-containing microcontroller -- a tiny computer that requires only a couple hundred microwatts of power to collect and process data.

The antenna harvests this power directly from the radio waves emitted by an RFID reader. When a tag comes within range of a reader, the reader's radio signal passes through the antenna, generating a voltage that activates the tag. The tag is then able to send information to the reader through a process called backscattering, in which the antenna essentially reflects a data-encoded variation of the received radio signal.

The microcontroller that Smith's team added to the RFID antenna includes a 16-bit microprocessor, 8 kilobytes of flash storage, and 256 bytes of random-access memory.

One of the microcontroller's main jobs is to ensure that information is transmitted to the reader error-free, which requires more computation than a conventional RFID tag can handle. In a typical tag, the error-checking information is precomputed and stored on the chip; but for a sensor, Smith says, this information needs to be computed in real-time as data is gathered.

Comments

  • Invisible Sensors
    So is throwing out the batteries used for making the sensors "invisible"? If such radio energy can be used to place batteries in other fields, won't that be good?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Brad Wang)
    05/15/2006
    Posts:1
  • [no subject]
    Why do you make so difficult to print out articles? I'm sure there is a simpler way.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Karl G. Schick)
    05/15/2006
    Posts:1
    • x
      there's a print link on the right-hand nav. looks like it works quite well, though it create an extra page, with the article on the second page (in my case).
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (x)
      05/15/2006
      Posts:1
  • energy, power, voltage
    Voltage has nothing to do with energy. Power is energy per unit time. So the phrase "that much energy" makes no sense.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (ms)
    05/15/2006
    Posts:1
    • Voltage
      Isn't voltage 'energy' per unit of electrical charge ?
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Joe)
      05/16/2006
      Posts:1
      • Voltage
        Voltage is not energy. Proximity to the reader's restricted e-m field will increase the voltage realized at the RFID device. A minimum voltage is req'd to operate the components in the device. 1.8V can be realized at a greater distance than 3.0V.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (Hayes)
        05/16/2006
        Posts:1
        • Voltage
          Voltage is basically the force of the electron flow - Think pressure. This is half of the story when looking at energy/work. voltage x amperage (a measure of the amount of electrons, think volume) = energy/work
          Rate this comment: 12345
          Guest (Klc)
          07/30/2006
          Posts:1
  • How soon will NSA adopt this technology
    They're already monitoring all our calls and emails, so obviously this it the next step - implanting them in everybody when they go through customs.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Paranoid)
    05/15/2006
    Posts:1
    • NSA
      Why customs? They'd fit easily into a Twinky or Oreo. Bon apetite.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Powernoid)
      05/16/2006
      Posts:1
  • Josh Smith is all wet!
    Mr. Smith clearly doesn't understand how passive RFID tags are "powered." They are powered by the electromagnetic energy generated by the RFID reader, not from solar, vibration, motion, or thermal sources. The reader's EMF field generates enough power that is picked up by the antenna on the RFID tag which then modulates the reader's query with the ID information on the tag. If there is no reader in the near-field, there is no power and the tag cannot do anything. This is NOT a solution for wireless sensor network that need power for their sensor over a longer time period than the field of a reader.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Dick Caro)
    05/15/2006
    Posts:1
    • dick caro is all wet
      Mr. Caro clearly doesnt understand how to read.
      "One way to achieve this sort of ubiquitous computing is to disperse tiny sensors that measure, for instance, light, temperature, or motion."
      doesnt say that the rfid tags are "powered" by solar, vibration, motion, or thermal sources....nope not at all....its saying that sensors to monitor these things could and most probably will become common....and the rest of the article that just as as an "RFID tag which then modulates the reader's query with the ID information on the tag"....a microprocessor could simularly modulate the data...stealing power from the readers induced current.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Dick Caro is all wet)
      05/15/2006
      Posts:1
  • Sensors without batteries
    Josh does not distinguish between inductive coupling (near field technology) and capacitive coupling (far field technology).  These two modes of coupling energy into an RFID tag or a sensing device operate at different distances.  Inductive coupling is more efficient, and one would think that this would be the mode to use to power up "power hungry" microcontrollers.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Marc)
    05/17/2006
    Posts:1
    • Inductive vs. Capacitive coupling
      Unfortunately, you want RANGE for these applications. This implies capacitive coupling. It makes no sense if you have to be very close to a reader. You might as well have a wire and plug into a wall in that case.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (James)
      05/19/2006
      Posts:1
      • Power me up Scotty
        You guys are great!  I'm not an electro wiz like most of you, but the reality of Inductive and Capacitive coupling is something that will be very handy in the near future.

        Sensing remote information will greatly advance our knowledge of what is going on with the planet and then maybe, given an influx of greater range of thinking ability, we just might save ourselves from... ourselves.

        Please think on this, design some new products and lets get on this wonderful opportunity of life and invention!

        Thanks!
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (Cullen)
        06/22/2006
        Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.