The NSF effort to make the medium smarter also runs up against the libertarian culture of the Internet, says Harvard's Zittrain. "The NSF program is a worthy one in the first instance because it begins with the premise that the current Net has outgrown some of its initial foundations and associated tenets," Zittrain says. "But there is a risk, too, that any attempt to rewrite the Net's technical constitution will be so much more fraught, so much more self-conscious of the nontechnical matters at stake, that the cure could be worse than the problem."
Still, Zittrain sees hazards ahead if some sensible action isn't taken. He posits that the Internet's security problems, and the theft of intellectual property, could produce a counterreaction that would amount to a clampdown on the medium -- everything from the tightening of software makers' control over their operating systems to security lockdowns by businesses. And of course, if a "digital Pearl Harbor" does occur, the federal government is liable to respond reflexively with heavy-handed reforms and controls. If such tightenings happen, Zittrain believes we're bound to get an Internet that is, in his words, "more secure -- and less interesting."
But what all sides agree on is that the Internet's perennial problems are getting worse, at the same time that society's dependence on it is deepening. Just a few years ago, the work of researchers like Peterson didn't garner wide interest outside the networking community. But these days, Clark and Peterson are giving briefings to Washington policymakers. "There is recognition that some of these problems are potentially quite serious. You could argue that they have always been there," Peterson says. "But there is a wider recognition in the highest level of the government that this is true. We are getting to the point where we are briefing people in the president's Office of Science and Technology Policy. I specifically did, and other people are doing that as well. As far as I know, that's pretty new."
Outside the door to Clark's office at MIT, a nametag placed by a prankster colleague announces it to be the office of Albus Dumbledore -- the wise headmaster of the Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, a central figure in the Harry Potter books. But while Clark in earlier years may have wrought some magic, helping transform the original Internet protocols into a robust communications technology that changed the world, he no longer has much control over what happens next.
But "because we don't have power, there is a greater chance that we will be left alone to try," he says. And so Clark, like Dumbledore, clucks over new generations of technical wizards. "My goal in calling for a fresh design is to free our minds from the current constraints, so we can envision a different future," he says. "The reason I stress this is that the Internet is so big, and so successful, that it seems like a fool's errand to send someone off to invent a different one." Whether the end result is a whole new architecture -- or just an effective set of changes to the existing one -- may not matter in the end. Given how entrenched the Internet is, the effort will have succeeded, he says, if it at least gets the research community working toward common goals, and helps "impose creep in the right direction."
Foundations for a New Infrastructure
The NSF's emerging effort to forge a clean-slate Internet architecture will draw on a wide body of existing research. Below is a sampling of major efforts aimed at improving everything from security to wireless communications.
PLANETLAB
Princeton University
Princeton, NJ
Focus: Creating an Internet "overlay network" of hardware and software—currently 630 machines in 25 countries—that performs functions ranging from searching for worms to optimizing traffic.
EMULAB
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, UT
Focus: A software and hardware test bed that provides researchers a simple, practical way to emulate the Internet for a wide variety of research goals.
DETER/University of Southern
California Information Sciences Institute
Marina del Rey, CA
Focus: A research test bed where researchers can safely launch simulated cyber-attacks, analyze them, and develop defensive strategies, especially for critical infrastructure.
WINLAB (Wireless Information Network Laboratory)
Rutgers University
New Brunswick, NJ
Focus: Develops wireless networking architectures and protocols, aimed at deploying the mobile Internet. Performs research on everything from high-speed modems to spectrum management.
Comments
Guest (John Hammond) on 12/21/2005 at 8:47 AM
1
Guest (John Hammond) on 12/21/2005 at 8:47 AM
1
Guest (H.M. Hubey) on 12/21/2005 at 10:56 AM
1
Guest (Erik Karl Sorgatz) on 12/21/2005 at 1:02 PM
1
Guest (Erik Karl Sorgatz) on 12/21/2005 at 1:02 PM
1
Guest (Jesse) on 12/27/2005 at 5:53 PM
1
1. You dont always have access to the contents. (encrypted)
2. You dont always have access to the entire message (incomplete messages)
3. You dont even necessarily have access to the entire packet (out of order fragmentation delivery)
Check the Security Focus web site, and read the white paper on router hacking...
You just CANNOT validate the contents at routers.
Guest (Jesse) on 12/27/2005 at 5:53 PM
1
1. You dont always have access to the contents. (encrypted)
2. You dont always have access to the entire message (incomplete messages)
3. You dont even necessarily have access to the entire packet (out of order fragmentation delivery)
Check the Security Focus web site, and read the white paper on router hacking...
You just CANNOT validate the contents at routers.
Guest (H.M. Hubey) on 12/21/2005 at 10:56 AM
1
Guest (Grant Callaghan) on 12/21/2005 at 11:09 AM
1
Charging a small amount per message would cut down on the spam, say a fraction of a penny, and it would generate enough money to police the system, free up bandwidth and catch bad hackers simply because the volume of traffic is so large.
The only danger I see to this is that the government tends to want to feed its cash cows with ever larger increases in taxation of any kind. If you let them start taxing the internet, there will be no end to it.
Guest (Aaron) on 12/21/2005 at 12:52 PM
1
It also seems that a lot of the original ideas that made the internet popular, decentralization and anonymous communication, are lost on its current inhabitants. My mother could care less that emails from me are signed, she just wants less spam in her mailbox.
Guest (Aaron) on 12/21/2005 at 12:52 PM
1
It also seems that a lot of the original ideas that made the internet popular, decentralization and anonymous communication, are lost on its current inhabitants. My mother could care less that emails from me are signed, she just wants less spam in her mailbox.
Guest (Dmitry Afanasiev) on 12/26/2005 at 6:34 AM
1
Here access means access to user. Obviously, this needs sender authentication, automatic charging or balance verification, and probably some sort of rule-based message cost negotiation (e.g. I want to deliver this message, but only if this costs me less than $xy.z). But it makes a lot of sense since (thanks to Moores law) human time and attention are now the most scarce and expensive resources on the Net
Guest (Dmitry Afanasiev) on 12/26/2005 at 6:34 AM
1
Here access means access to user. Obviously, this needs sender authentication, automatic charging or balance verification, and probably some sort of rule-based message cost negotiation (e.g. I want to deliver this message, but only if this costs me less than $xy.z). But it makes a lot of sense since (thanks to Moores law) human time and attention are now the most scarce and expensive resources on the Net
Guest (Grant Callaghan) on 12/21/2005 at 11:09 AM
1
Charging a small amount per message would cut down on the spam, say a fraction of a penny, and it would generate enough money to police the system, free up bandwidth and catch bad hackers simply because the volume of traffic is so large.
The only danger I see to this is that the government tends to want to feed its cash cows with ever larger increases in taxation of any kind. If you let them start taxing the internet, there will be no end to it.
danth on 02/01/2007 at 12:16 AM
3
Guest (B. Curtis) on 12/21/2005 at 1:04 PM
1
No, postage on email is just one of those fun ideas that just wont work.
Guest (B. Curtis) on 12/21/2005 at 1:04 PM
1
No, postage on email is just one of those fun ideas that just wont work.
Guest (Jim Hayes) on 12/21/2005 at 1:54 PM
1
Legit emaillers would gladly pay a penny per email to interested recipients while spammers sending out tens of millions of messages a day to random addresses - many of whom seem to illegally use some of my email addresses as return addresses by the way - would be put to rest.
By law, 911 calls are toll-free.
The issue of billing is easy - include 1000 emails per month in an account from an ISP, so only the excess is billed, so few users will even need to be billed.
BTW, I do know companies who have limited access to the Internet for employees because of overloads of viruses and spam, as well as abuses in downloading inappropriate material - I fired an employee myself for storing his downloaded porn on a company computer.
Guest (Khushnood Naqvi) on 12/28/2005 at 3:27 AM
1
But the only problem, I see with that one is that the Internet in the current form will be abondoned and so become more hazardous for people who continue to rely on this one.
Guest (Khushnood Naqvi) on 12/28/2005 at 3:27 AM
1
But the only problem, I see with that one is that the Internet in the current form will be abondoned and so become more hazardous for people who continue to rely on this one.
Guest (Jim Hayes) on 12/21/2005 at 1:54 PM
1
Legit emaillers would gladly pay a penny per email to interested recipients while spammers sending out tens of millions of messages a day to random addresses - many of whom seem to illegally use some of my email addresses as return addresses by the way - would be put to rest.
By law, 911 calls are toll-free.
The issue of billing is easy - include 1000 emails per month in an account from an ISP, so only the excess is billed, so few users will even need to be billed.
BTW, I do know companies who have limited access to the Internet for employees because of overloads of viruses and spam, as well as abuses in downloading inappropriate material - I fired an employee myself for storing his downloaded porn on a company computer.
Guest (666) on 12/21/2005 at 3:04 PM
1
The problem with all software is that underlying software is hard and unmaintenable instead being soft and flexible.
This will be rectified by my chosen acronym.
Guest (666) on 12/21/2005 at 3:04 PM
1
The problem with all software is that underlying software is hard and unmaintenable instead being soft and flexible.
This will be rectified by my chosen acronym.
Guest (Jose I. Icaza) on 12/23/2005 at 9:40 PM
1
Guest (Jose I. Icaza) on 12/23/2005 at 9:40 PM
1
Guest (Bob Benitez) on 01/12/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Cornelio Hopmann) on 01/12/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
That's the key issue behind the issued V. Cerf raises.
The basic concepts of the architecture of Windows-XX are faulty as they mix user-level and system-level functionalities (last example the wmf-hack). The Software-engineering community and Microsoft itself do know it for decades. Yet as the business-model of MS relies on bundling Operating Software and Application-Software -like Office etc.- this flaw is intentionally a part of the business-model. Hence before starting to repair at Internet-level what was misdone by Microsoft -at the expense of public and customer money- Microsoft should be obliged by law and courts to produce consumer-safe products - as any other producer of technology for mass-consumption like car, freezers or air-conditioners.
danth on 02/01/2007 at 12:21 AM
3
Webkiller.net is the answer, not more government regulation.
Guest (NetAlter_Fan_1001) on 08/04/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Google keywords : netalter
Ko on 03/04/2007 at 8:06 AM
2
This company needs IT saviours. I can't go into details but I'm trying to put together a team of specialists to help the company get rid of this horrific virus (they say it comes from Romania). CNN was infected with it too.
Check HERALD TRIBUNE at: http://www.heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070302/BREAKING/70302006&start=1
"March 02. 2007 12:08PM - Computer virus hits Herald-Tribune
By TODD RUGER
todd.ruger@heraldtribune.com
SARASOTA — A computer virus spreading through business systems this week has hindered several media outlets, including the Sarasota Herald-Tribune.
The newspaper’s production equipment was affected Thursday night, forcing the newspaper to print Friday’s editions without several of its local news, sports and editorial pages. The technical problems also caused papers to be delivered late.
Media reports from across the country show similar problems occurred at a dozen media outlets, including Turner Broadcasting, owner of cable news channel CNN, McClatchy-owned newspapers and the Minneapolis Star-Tribune.
The culprit is the latest version of an old computer virus, RINBOT.L. It is not specifically targeted to attack media outlets, but it cripples Internet and e-mail communications."
Contrary to the journalist, I think it does target mainstream media outlets. It looks like a group of hackers are terrorising the MEDIA by trying to shut it down. We don't see that kind of thing on You Tube.
Anyway, this major media conglomerate is PARALYSED by the virus. IT'S A HUGE PROBLEM.
Please reply if you know who the best IT virus repairperson is. Just for the record, the media conglomerate has hired the best of the best IT specialists. And it’s still CRIPPLED.
If the media co wants me on board to help out, it will only be as a go between and to help create a team. I’m not involved in IT, I’m a tv producer. I will also try to get in touch with David D. Clark but am not sure he's the right person for this problem. We sort of need a special team, sort of a swat team, a guerrilla team made of hackers themselves, engineers, internet architects, internet researchers. etc.
Someone from the company mentioned changing the OS from windows to Mac but somehow I have a feeling it wouldn't solve our problems. Would Linux be a valuable solution?
Anyway, this is a long comment, I’ll give more details and be less confidential if someone replies to me.
Thank you,
Ko (koandco@gmail.com)
From Montreal and Toronto
PS: I’ll forward people’s name to IT Director and it’s between you and them. The company is Canadian.