Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement

Tuesday, November 29, 2005

Next-Generation Networks

Continued from page 1

By David Talbot

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

TR: What do you predict will be possible in the future?

DVH: I believe the network of the future will support a whole new set of applications -- immersive collaboration environments, resource-sharing, real-time computation-intensive simulations, HDTV-quality video on demand, and many others that probably can't even be imagined today. These applications will lead to further fundamental changes in the way we work, the way we learn, the way we entertain, the way we govern, and the way we live. We see three key areas of work we think are required to unleash the unrealized potential of the Internet: optical networking, federated authentication, and reliable end-to-end network performance.

TR: How can we tackle the basic problem of increasing bandwidth to support all this?

DVH: The Internet2 community has taken an innovative and ambitious approach to this pressing scalability issue. By creating a hybrid model of networking that combines the current IP-based technology and optical circuit paths -- similar to the traditional telephone system --we believe consumers and businesses will have the ability to demand any type of broadband service they need when they want it, how they want it, and where they want it. This type of on-demand capacity can have far-reaching effects on industries across the board, from medicine and health sciences, to the arts, to entertainment and well beyond.

TR: Do you have solutions for tackling spam and various kinds of Internet fraud?

DVH: Consumers and businesses alike are bombarded daily by spam, viruses, and other nasty side effects of the Internet. It's almost become cliché to ask "What are we going to do about spam?" Yet the problem only seems to get worse and no one really seems to have the answers. So, whom can you trust? I see a network future with trust at the core, where communities are formed based on agreed-upon rules and frameworks, called federations.

A federation is an association of organizations that use a common set of attributes, practices, and policies to exchange information about their users and resources in order to enable secure, authenticated collaborations and transactions. In a sense, a federation is like a village, but it is not geographically defined. In Internet2, we now have global federations of scientists, artists, and students working on joint projects. I believe that in the future, trusted communities and federations will enable Internet users to receive only the information they want, and because communication must be authenticated, all unwanted information can be easily traced back to its true source, eliminating the anonymity of spammers and scammers.

Comments

  • Semantic vs. Internet2 ?
    Guest (Siddharth Jha) on 11/29/2005 at 4:28 PM
    Posts:
    1
    Wow. Though, how does the Semantic Web (&quotSir Tim Berners Lee&quot, Oct 2004) compare to this?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Semantic web doesnt compare - its different
      Guest (Neal Pitts) on 12/01/2005 at 3:08 AM
      Posts:
      1
      The semantic web is a different beast.  Internet2 concerns itself with high-end network applications requiring gobs of bandwidth and reliable delivery the semantic web is all about tagging objects in web space so you can find them and refer to them in an &quotobject oriented&quot manner.  The two can coexist.  The problem with deploying both is somewhat similar - you have to &quotbreak&quot the existing infrastructure to deploy either.  Web designers dont want to have to describe every piece of data on their web site based on some international dictionary, and ISPs dont want to dump all their old infrastructure equipment to deploy the fancy optical switching gear (not to mention the change in TCP protocol, etc.)
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Semantic web doesnt compare - its different
      Guest (Neal Pitts) on 12/01/2005 at 3:08 AM
      Posts:
      1
      The semantic web is a different beast.  Internet2 concerns itself with high-end network applications requiring gobs of bandwidth and reliable delivery the semantic web is all about tagging objects in web space so you can find them and refer to them in an &quotobject oriented&quot manner.  The two can coexist.  The problem with deploying both is somewhat similar - you have to &quotbreak&quot the existing infrastructure to deploy either.  Web designers dont want to have to describe every piece of data on their web site based on some international dictionary, and ISPs dont want to dump all their old infrastructure equipment to deploy the fancy optical switching gear (not to mention the change in TCP protocol, etc.)
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Semantic web doesnt compare - its different
      Guest (Neal Pitts) on 12/01/2005 at 10:52 AM
      Posts:
      1
      The semantic web is a different beast.  Internet2 concerns itself with high-end network applications requiring gobs of bandwidth and reliable delivery the semantic web is all about tagging objects in web space so you can find them and refer to them in an &quotobject oriented&quot manner.  The two can coexist.  The problem with deploying both is somewhat similar - you have to &quotbreak&quot the existing infrastructure to deploy either.  Web designers dont want to have to describe every piece of data on their web site based on some international dictionary, and ISPs dont want to dump all their old infrastructure equipment to deploy the fancy optical switching gear (not to mention the change in TCP protocol, etc.)
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Semantic vs. Internet2 ?
    Guest (Siddharth Jha) on 11/29/2005 at 4:28 PM
    Posts:
    1
    Wow. Though, how does the Semantic Web (&quotSir Tim Berners Lee&quot, Oct 2004) compare to this?
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Fiber to the Premise
    Guest (Randy) on 02/12/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Verizon's Fiber to the Premise initiative currently provides speeds of 5, 15 and 30Mbps. FIOS is the code name that will provide enough bandwidth for HD TV, online gaming, video conferencing, VOD, IP telephony, Internet browsing and allows for future applications such as Interactive IPTV. Verizon’s (MCI merger) global backbone is a state of the art backbone delivering up to OC192. AT&T and others are spending billions of dollars to transform their networks to accommodate voice, video and data over high bandwidth fiber connections. New TV national franchise/ telecommunications reform legislation is currently being debated and will help fuel the growth of next generation (broadband) Internet.
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology