Web

Next-Generation Networks

Today’s Internet is like “second-class mail,” but solutions exist, says Doug Van Houweling, CEO of Internet2.

  • Tuesday, November 29, 2005
  • By David Talbot

What if a privileged few could buy the best possible Internet technology -- what would they get? The answer is out there: created by the advanced networking consortium called Internet2, it's high-performance connections built for, and used by, more than 240 research and academic institutions in the United States. Internet2 networks handle such jobs as the transmission of torrents of data from astronomical observations and physics experiments.

While the average Internet user can't tap into Internet2, its technologies show what might be possible in an idealized world: everything from high-definition streaming television to ever-more complex, multiplayer, 3-D online games. Technology Review chief correspondent David Talbot asked Douglas Van Houweling, CEO of the Ann Arbor, MI-based Internet2, how -- and when -- these technologies can make the transition from a closed research environment to the public.

Advertisement

Technology Review: What is Internet2 accomplishing for the research community it serves?

Doug Van Houweling: Today, scientists throughout the world are collaborating via Internet2's network on things like high-energy physics experiments, medical diagnoses, and the sharing of vast amounts of supercomputer data. Internet2 is led by more than 200 U.S. universities working with industry and government to develop and deploy advanced network applications and technologies for research and higher education.

Today, over 240 institutions, 34 state education networks, and 70 international networks connect to Internet2 networks to facilitate teaching and learning programs, to enable investigations into new networking technologies, and to make revolutionary Internet applications possible. We also have close to 70 corporations from diverse industries who are active collaborators within the Internet2 community. These corporate members play a key role in understanding and developing emerging technologies and how to make them routinely available to hundreds of millions of people on the global Internet.

TR: What's the problem with today's Internet?

DVH: Internet technology has begun to reach limits that could pose barriers to future economic growth. The proliferation of closed architectures, the tendency for companies to protect their interests rather than invest in standards-based solutions, increased security and safety concerns across a wide range of sectors, and ongoing scalability challenges all stand in the way of an advanced Internet.

TR: What do you expect the average consumer would want from an advanced Internet?

DVH: It is only a matter of time before consumers will make the same capacity demands on the network in their day-to-day use of network applications that the research and education community has today. Telecommunications companies have been talking for years about bringing fiber to the homes of consumers to enable the delivery of demanding digital content. But services like HDTV-quality video and immersive surround sound create demands that destabilize today's Internet. So the concept of "if you build it, they will come" simply will not work in the current environment -- simply putting fiber in place will not do the job.

Print

Related Articles

Is the Net Too Neutral?

Recent FCC hearings pitted network operators and content distributors against each other. But if the two can find a way to collaborate, the Internet will work better for everybody.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Guest (Siddharth Jha)

  • 2268 Days Ago
  • 11/29/2005

Semantic vs. Internet2 ?

Wow. Though, how does the Semantic Web (&quotSir Tim Berners Lee&quot, Oct 2004) compare to this?

Reply

Guest (Neal Pitts)

  • 2266 Days Ago
  • 12/01/2005

Semantic web doesnt compare - its different

The semantic web is a different beast.  Internet2 concerns itself with high-end network applications requiring gobs of bandwidth and reliable delivery the semantic web is all about tagging objects in web space so you can find them and refer to them in an &quotobject oriented&quot manner.  The two can coexist.  The problem with deploying both is somewhat similar - you have to &quotbreak&quot the existing infrastructure to deploy either.  Web designers dont want to have to describe every piece of data on their web site based on some international dictionary, and ISPs dont want to dump all their old infrastructure equipment to deploy the fancy optical switching gear (not to mention the change in TCP protocol, etc.)

Reply

Guest (Neal Pitts)

  • 2266 Days Ago
  • 12/01/2005

Semantic web doesnt compare - its different

The semantic web is a different beast.  Internet2 concerns itself with high-end network applications requiring gobs of bandwidth and reliable delivery the semantic web is all about tagging objects in web space so you can find them and refer to them in an &quotobject oriented&quot manner.  The two can coexist.  The problem with deploying both is somewhat similar - you have to &quotbreak&quot the existing infrastructure to deploy either.  Web designers dont want to have to describe every piece of data on their web site based on some international dictionary, and ISPs dont want to dump all their old infrastructure equipment to deploy the fancy optical switching gear (not to mention the change in TCP protocol, etc.)

Reply

Guest (Neal Pitts)

  • 2266 Days Ago
  • 12/01/2005

Semantic web doesnt compare - its different

The semantic web is a different beast.  Internet2 concerns itself with high-end network applications requiring gobs of bandwidth and reliable delivery the semantic web is all about tagging objects in web space so you can find them and refer to them in an &quotobject oriented&quot manner.  The two can coexist.  The problem with deploying both is somewhat similar - you have to &quotbreak&quot the existing infrastructure to deploy either.  Web designers dont want to have to describe every piece of data on their web site based on some international dictionary, and ISPs dont want to dump all their old infrastructure equipment to deploy the fancy optical switching gear (not to mention the change in TCP protocol, etc.)

Reply

Guest (Siddharth Jha)

  • 2268 Days Ago
  • 11/29/2005

Semantic vs. Internet2 ?

Wow. Though, how does the Semantic Web (&quotSir Tim Berners Lee&quot, Oct 2004) compare to this?

Reply

Guest (Randy)

  • 2193 Days Ago
  • 02/12/2006

Fiber to the Premise

Verizon's Fiber to the Premise initiative currently provides speeds of 5, 15 and 30Mbps. FIOS is the code name that will provide enough bandwidth for HD TV, online gaming, video conferencing, VOD, IP telephony, Internet browsing and allows for future applications such as Interactive IPTV. Verizon’s (MCI merger) global backbone is a state of the art backbone delivering up to OC192. AT&T and others are spending billions of dollars to transform their networks to accommodate voice, video and data over high bandwidth fiber connections. New TV national franchise/ telecommunications reform legislation is currently being debated and will help fuel the growth of next generation (broadband) Internet.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

A Social-Media Decoder

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

SpaceX

Groupon

First Solar

Layar

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement