Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement
[1] 2 3 Next »

Monday, January 30, 2006

Google: Beyond Good and Evil

With its "Don't be evil" motto, the search giant strives to be the choirboy of corporate America. The problem: good and evil are in the eye of the beholder.

By Wade Roush

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

"Don't be evil." It's the mantra that search giant Google adopted almost ten years ago, when it decided to take on Yahoo and others in the search wars. Today, its strategy and technology appear to have won. Everyone uses Google. It's the de facto leader in search -- indeed, "Google" has become the verb for the act of searching on the Internet.

Yet nowadays, everyone seems to have a gripe, or at least a grumble, about Google.

Like any large business -- and, make no mistake, with its nearly $52 billion market cap and $7 billion in cash reserves, the Mountain View, CA-based company is one of the largest media entities in the world -- Google has sometimes come under criticism. In Google's case, the complaints are often about the very practices that have made it such a valuable online tool, such as the way it scans the e-mail messages of Gmail users in order to serve up relevant ads.

But as the company has extended its ambitions into so many parts of the digital world -- from comparison shopping to blogging and video downloads -- it's finding itself more and more frequently at the center of much larger political and ethical debates -- and under attack from all sides.

Google's decision last week to launch a specialized version of its services in China -- minus blogging and e-mail tools, not to mention search results that Chinese government officials might deem subversive -- may be most damaging to its do-gooder image.

Not surprisingly, Google gained the backing of other companies, such as Microsoft, who would also like to bring information services to China, and who see acceding to censorship as a lesser evil.

But it was doused in criticism from human rights groups. Amnesty International called the move "the latest in a string of examples of global Internet companies caving in to pressure from the Chinese government." Reporters Without Borders said the launch of Google.cn was "a black day for freedom of expression in China." Some observers have even called for a Google divestment campaign. "Everyone who cares about the free-flow of information, about democracy in China, in fact about democracy anywhere, should start selling their Google stock," writes novelist, screenwriter, and blogger Roger L. Simon.

How quickly things change. Just a week earlier, Google was winning plaudits from civil libertarians for not caving in to demands for data on users' search behaviors from the U.S. Department of Justice, which wants to use the data to revive a 1998 online pornography law struck down two years ago by the U.S. Supreme Court. (Federal officials, who are preparing to defend the constitutionality of the Child Online Protection Act in a federal court in Pennsylvania, say they need records of a week's worth of Google search queries and 1 million random Web addresses in order to show that minors have easy access to Internet porn.)

Yet even that decision by Google led to public-relations problems, since many Internet users were surprised and angered when they learned from coverage of the dispute that Google keeps records of old searches, and that these searches could conceivably be traced back to an individual's computer.

In short, Google's business bears so directly on key hot-button issues today -- privacy, free speech, intellectual property rights -- that no matter what the company does, it will likely offend someone. What's more, by publicizing such a high-minded motto, "Don't be evil" -- the phrase even appeared in the company's SEC filings before its initial public offering in 2004 -- Google has given critics a weapon to throw back at it every time it strays across someone's ethical boundary.

[1] 2 3 Next »

Comments

  • Google's inconsistency
    Guest (V. L Elliott) on 01/30/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Google accepted and, in some ways, is  enforcing the restrictions that the totalitarian government of China places on the people of China.  Google chose to deny and, indeed, oppose a US Government attempt to obtain information that at least some believed to be needed for the anti-terrorism campaign.  Google's supporters argued that the latter decision was based on fundmental principles.  The decision with regard to China seems to be based on acquiring a larger share of a growing market.  While it may be a reasoned decision it brings into question Google's motivation.  It looks like the complany is using muliple standards. To date, Google has not given us a satisfactory explanation of the apparent inconsistency. 
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • black and white views
      Guest (Leila) on 01/30/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      It is fantastic that we can have access to such an important news as how companies and government operate and set up new relationship.
      It is also a great opportunity for me, as a person from a developing country, to follow up press and ONGs reaction. And the opportunity to discuss the issue.
      I am wondering if we could think the opposite: Google refuse to accept China's law. What would happen? I think about Cuba and US no-relationship...
      What kind of trade-offs would a company do? Can countries with no democracy history change? How come?
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Google will pay for this...
      Guest (Down with Google) on 01/30/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Many big companies were forced to pay reparations for cooperating with the Nazi regimes in Europe. They looked the other way, just so they could make some profits. They didn't care that it was bloodmoney. When democracy will come to China, all these corporate whores will be held accountable for supporting a dictatorial regime.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • why would that be
        Guest (mad matter) on 02/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
        Posts:
        1
        The US government supports plenty of dictators, eg Saddam Hussein in the 80's. They have not paid for it yet, welcome to your world
        Rate this comment: 12345
  • Google -Beyond Good ---etc
    Guest (AH Rosen) on 01/30/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    We users have to choose - do we want exclusive control of all of our data/ Or, do we want to put some or all of it on the web in exchange for free unlimiuted storage and services that can make us happy? There is an  unavoidable price to be paid for each choice. anyone who has had a crashed computer knows the price for the first chaice. Coogle is not alone in the second - EK comes to mind for pictures, as do banks for your money.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Evolution of Google services
    Guest (Charlie Richmond) on 01/31/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Only last year, 2005, I was able to find collections of poetry and prose with great facility.  A couple of weeks ago I was teaching a class of "seniors" how to use search engines and only seemed to turn up books for sale.

    I was able to modify my search words and get to a few sources but even then, they were heavily salted with the "for sale" items.

    Perhaps Google could make return to its more arcane logic just for us older folk who just want to reread some of the many wonderful writings that we have learned to love over the years.

    Charlie Richmond
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • I don't really agree this is a foul play
    Guest (blink4blog) on 02/05/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Each country consist of its national policy on media and information system and China just wants whats the best for them. Google or Microsoft could choose not to goto China if they think the market is not profitable?

    http://blink4blog.blogspot.com
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • test reply 1 subject
      Guest (test reply 1 name) on 04/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      test reply 1 message
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Googles not all evil in China
    Guest (N Huntoon) on 02/16/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Something people seem to be forgetting when discussing google.cn is that it's not the only version of Google available in China.  Chinese can still use www.google.com and get uncensored access to entire internet.  They only have to put up with slow response times because the server they are connecting to is located elsewhere.  Google.cn only accesses the servers inside China.  In order for Google to place servers inside China, they have to comply with Chinese laws.  If I were a Chinese citizen, I would use google.cn for my benign searches but put up with the longer wait times when I'm trying to overthrow the government.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • interesting
      Guest (mad matter) on 02/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      I guess that will be the acid test, when the chinese government asks google for info from google.com (assuming they can actually get on through their service provider) do they give the chinese government the requested info. If they don't then surely google.cn will be outlawed also. The question remains, will google yahoo or "not do evil"
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • test new 1 subject
    Guest (test new 1 name) on 04/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    test new 1 message
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • test new 2 subject
    Guest (test new 2 name) on 04/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    test new 2 message
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • test reply 2 subject
      Guest (test reply 2 name) on 04/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      test reply 2 message
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • [no subject]
      Guest on 04/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • test asdfasdfdfdff
        Guest (test asdasdfasd) on 04/18/2006 at 12:00 AM
        Posts:
        1
        testfffffff
        Rate this comment: 12345
  • test new 3 subject
    Guest (test new 3 name) on 04/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    test new 3 message
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • test new 4 subject
    Guest (test new 4 name) on 04/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    test new 4 message
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • test reply 3 subject
      Guest (test reply 3 name) on 04/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      test reply 3 message
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • test new 5subject
    Guest (test new 5 name) on 04/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    test new 5 message
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • test html encode "asdf"
    Guest (test html encode "asdf") on 04/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    test html encode
    line
    line2
    line3
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • test html encode 2 "asdf"
    Guest (test html encode 2"asdf") on 04/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    test html encode 2 "asdf"
    line1
    line2
    line3
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • test html encode 6 "asdf"
    Guest (test html encode 6 "asdf") on 04/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    test html encode 6 "asdf"
    line1
    line2
    line3
    <asdf>
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • [no subject]
    Guest on 04/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • test new reply subject
      Guest (test new reply name) on 04/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      test new reply message
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • tewtasdfsadf
    Guest (test fffff) on 04/18/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    asdfasdfsfazxcvzxsadff
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review November/December 2008
Sun + Water = Fuel
An MIT chemist has opened the way to making hydrogen fuel from water using sunlight.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology