Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Part II: A Failure of Intelligence

Continued from page 4

By Freeman Dyson

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Smeed also had a fatalistic view of traffic accidents. He collected statistics on traffic deaths from many countries, all the way back to the invention of the automobile. He found that under an enormous range of conditions, the number of deaths in a country per year is given by a simple formula: number of deaths equals .0003 times the two-thirds power of the number of people times the one-third power of the number of cars. This formula is known as Smeed's Law. He published it in 1949, and it is still valid 57 years later. It is, of course, not exact, but it holds within a factor of two for almost all countries at almost all times. It is remarkable that the number of deaths does not depend strongly on the size of the country, the quality of the roads, the rules and regulations governing traffic, or the safety equipment installed in cars. Smeed interpreted his law as a law of human nature. The number of deaths is determined mainly by psychological factors that are independent of material circumstances. People will drive recklessly until the number of deaths reaches the maximum they can tolerate. When the number exceeds that limit, they drive more carefully. Smeed's Law merely defines the number of deaths that we find psychologically tolerable.

The last year of the War was quiet at ORS Bomber Command. We knew that the War was coming to an end and that nothing we could do would make much difference. With or without our help, Bomber Command was doing better. In the fall of 1944, when the Germans were driven out of France, it finally became possible for our bombers to make accurate and devastating night attacks on German oil refineries and synthetic-oil-production plants. We had long known these targets to be crucial to Germany's war economy, but we had never been able to attack them effectively. That changed for two reasons. First, the loss of France made the German fighter defenses much less effective. Second, a new method of organizing attacks was invented by 5 Group, the most independent of the Bomber Command groups. The method originated with 617 Squadron, one of the 5 Group squadrons, which carried out the famous attack on the Ruhr dams in March 1943. The good idea, as usually happens in large organizations, percolated up from the bottom rather than trickling down from the top. The approach called for a "master bomber" who would fly a Mosquito at low altitude over a target, directing the attack by radio in plain language. The master bomber would first mark the target accurately with target indicator flares and then tell the heavy bombers overhead precisely where to aim. A deputy master bomber in another Mosquito was ready to take over in case the first one was shot down. Five Group carried out many such precision attacks with great success and low losses, while the other groups flew to other places and distracted the fighter defenses. In the last winter of the War, the German army and air force finally began to run out of oil. Bomber Command could justly claim to have helped the Allied armies who were fighting their way into Germany from east and west.

 

Comments

  • I propose a variation on Smeed's law
    For collateral damage. Collateral damage will likewise equilibrate to a constant rate, as civilians in at-risk areas will compensate for an attacking force's measures to reduce collateral damage by taking greater risks until such risks become unacceptable to them.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    amulekii
    12/05/2006
    Posts:10
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • [no subject]
    Interesting text, with a human touch. Mr. Dyson, I didn't live at that time, but it seems to me that British remembrances of WW1 days were not the trigger for bombing Dresden and others "when the war was already won". German attacks on London with V-1 and V-2 devices, causing 9,000 deaths from Jul/44 to Mar/45, more likely were.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    versatech
    12/05/2006
    Posts:1
  • US Highway Deaths and smeed's law
    Not sure if they are playing with the stats, but they seem to be going down.  I recall the deaths being in the mid-fifties years ago, when the population and number of cars were less.  Today it appears the number is in the low 40's.  http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-30/NCSA/RNotes/2005/809897.pdf
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ghaller
    12/05/2006
    Posts:4
  • Bomber's don't work
    Clinton proved that bombing does work in Bosnia.  The bombing side has to have control of the skies and the ability ro deliver munitions with more precision than existed in WWII.  On the other hand, the Israelis could not make this work in Lebanon.  They could not find enough of the missile depots to make the strategy effective.  They could not take out the leadership.  So the strategy still has its limits.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ghaller
    12/05/2006
    Posts:4
  • So, where's the rest?
    Been waiting for parts III, IV, and V for this series but haven't seen them?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    lescoulee
    12/18/2006
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.