Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

How to Burn a Three Terabyte CD

A new nano-optical device can focus laser light tighter than traditional optics, which could lead to higher-density data storage.

By Kate Greene

Friday, September 15, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

As gigabytes of movies, pictures, audio, and text fill up more and more CDs and DVDs, there's clearly a need for better ways to save more data. A research team at Harvard University has developed a technique that could help to significantly boost the capacity of conventional optical discs. They've fabricated a nano antenna--built directly onto an inexpensive, off-the-shelf laser--that focuses light to a much smaller spot size than is possible with even the best traditional lenses, potentially enabling more bits to be written onto an optical disc.

A computer simulation of the optical nano antenna that Harvard researchers have fabricated. Consisting of two gold-coated nano rods separated by a 30-nanometer gap, the antenna can focus light from a commercial laser to a spot just 40 nanometers wide. It could be used to write terabytes, rather than gigabytes, of data to a CD or DVD. (Credit: Ertugrul Cubukcu)

The storage capacity of a disc increases as the wavelength of light used to write data to it decreases; CDs are written and read using light with a wavelength of 780 nanometers, DVDs use 650 nanometers, and HD-DVDs and Blu-ray discs use 405 nanometers. Wavelengths shorter than 405 nanometers would require light sources far too expensive for consumer electronics.

The problem is that conventional lenses can only focus light to half their wavelength, a physical barrier called the diffraction limit. The Harvard researchers sidestepped this limit, however, by abandoning traditional optics in favor of nano-optical techniques. "We can get around the wavelength limitation by using an antenna," says Ken Crozier, assistant professor of electrical engineering at Harvard.

The team of Crozier, Federico Capasso, professor of applied physics at the university, and graduate students Eric Kort and Ertugrul Cubukcu designed the optical antenna to focus light from a commercial laser (with a wavelength of 830 nanometers) to a spot size of 40 nanometers. With this resolution, "you'd be able to pack more than three terabytes [about 3,000 gigabytes] worth of data onto something the size of a CD," Crozier estimates. That's enough to hold more than 300 feature-length movies. By comparison, a dual-layer HD-DVD or Blu-ray disc can hold 30 gigabytes or 50 gigabytes, respectively.

The antenna consists of two gold-coated nano rods, separated by a 30-nanometer-wide gap, according to Crozier. When light from the laser hits the nano rods, it applies a force to the electrons in the gold, nudging them out of place. The electrons don't stay displaced for long, however, and are pulled back toward their original position. But they overshoot it, Crozier says, and bounce back out of place, oscillating "like a mass on a spring."

These oscillating electrons affect the tiny gap between the nano rods. If you took a snapshot of the antenna, Crozier says, you'd see that positive charges collect on one side of the gap, and negative charges on the other. The nano rods and gap act as a tiny capacitor--with opposite charges on opposite sides of the gap--that effectively concentrates the energy from the laser light into a spot about the size of the gap. This spot maintains its size to about 10 nanometers away from the antenna before it starts to spread out.

Comments

  • But how is it read?
    Admitting that I know little about the internal workings of a DVD or CD player...would there have to be a modification to allow these massivly compressed discs to be read?  Is there a reasonable consumer solution?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    deirdrebeth
    09/15/2006
    Posts:25
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: But how is it read?
      I'd imagine the new discs wouldn't work on the old platforms, just as CD players can't read DVDs. But just as DVDs didn't replace CDs, CDs and DVDs will probably continue to exist alongside the next generation. Not everyone needs that kind of storage, after all.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Monsterboy
      09/15/2006
      Posts:72
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: But how is it read?
        Yes I will admit that I do have a 12 inch Laserdisc (not a "compact" laser disk) and an 8 inch Floppy Disk.  I'm sure the media is still good..
        The only reason we don't still use these is because rotating media tends to be inconvenient in size and storage amount. Plus it still HAS to compete with other things like flash drives. Neither the 12" laser disk or 8" Floppy would ever fit in a Laptop.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        liverwort460...
        11/03/2008
        Posts:1
    • Re: But how is it read?
      Very Long Baseline Array - isn't it obvious?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      teuton
      09/15/2006
      Posts:1
    • Re: But how is it read?
      Good question. Without a reader the cd would be worhless. That much info on a CD would certainly take a very special kind of reader.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      parkehoover
      09/27/2006
      Posts:3
    • Re: But how is it read?
      Reading fast is not the only problem here - once recorded, if its read then buffering the data output fast would be a problem also. Current technology would require a solid state RAM device to accomodate such data to use it. Very few solid state computers exist that can claim to process data in memory on solid state RAM. These are used for very large datasets - such as huge data mining ops and data warehouse queries for realtime analytics. So use of such a device would initially be limited to such applications in order to record and retrieve very large datasets in a very small form factor.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      baatkarlo
      11/08/2006
      Posts:4
      Avg Rating:
      1/5
  • Terabyte CD
    I would love to see an adapter or something for the exsisting units out there so the consumer doesn't have to replace his exsisting computer equipement. That would be nice.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    cwmack
    09/26/2006
    Posts:1
  • True Uncompressed Movies
    I hate compression artifacts in movies.  I see them even in DVD movies. 

    With this much space, you could store a two hour, HDTV 1080p movie completely uncompressed.  A 1080p frame is 1920x1080 pixels, at say 32 bits per pixel, is 8.55 Mb per frame.  30 frames per second, is 216,000 frames in a two hour movie.  Add in a few megabytes for multichannel Dolby/THX sound and the entire movie would be about 1.64 terabytes, well within the capability of this storage technology.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    gmlobdell
    11/07/2006
    Posts:1
    • Re: True Uncompressed Movies
      Plus a 16-way 64-bit display card on a 128-way 64-bit computer to play it...if someone invents a fast enough network interface to push the data as its read. The other option is to have a solid state 4Tb RAM box that lifts the movie into memory and plays it from there.

      The point is it would take a new kind of device to play such a movie within two hours...or we'd have to get used to verrrryyyy slowwww motion movies and low pitched surround sound.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      baatkarlo
      11/08/2006
      Posts:4
      Avg Rating:
      1/5
  • Antenna attrition and effect on resolution?
    If the electrons oscillate, some will overshoot with sufficient energy to escape or cause interference fringe altering the focus. Would this affect the accuracy of the data recorded? How redundant does the information have to be to get past this issue?

    Also, does heat generation affect the antenna attritioning the gap in a short enough time to render it incapable of becoming mass production quality?

    Typical mass production would be achievable provided mean time between failures is similar or better than current recording devices.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    baatkarlo
    11/08/2006
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
  • Difficult playback and recording
    With a 10nm tolerance before the beam starts to spread, designing a mechanism that can spin a mass produced disk very fast and maintain virtually no vibration so the "read head" can stay 10nm above the disk will be a difficult engineering job indeed.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Sponge
    06/09/2007
    Posts:4

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review July/August 2009

Current Issue

Search Me
Inside the launch of Stephen Wolfram’s new “computational knowledge engine.”
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.