Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Friday, February 17, 2006

Google's Private Lives

Its new desktop search application would make your personal files available for government searches without your knowledge.

By Dylan Tweney

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

A new search technology from Google makes it possible for law enforcement officials to examine personal documents from your hard drive, without your knowing it, according to the digital-rights advocacy organization Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).

Released last week, Google Desktop 3, the latest version of the company's desktop search utility, adds a "Search Across Computers" feature that automatically uploads files from a user's computer onto Google's servers. Then, when a search is performed on any computer owned by the user, Google Desktop will pull search results from both the Web and information stored on all the user's computers.

Certainly, such a feature will be handy for anyone trying to coordinate a project from different locations. Yet the idea of turning over private files to a public company is worrisome to privacy advocates. In fact, in a press release, the EFF has urged consumers to avoid the Search Across Computers feature because it would make consumers' files more vulnerable to subpoenas from government investigators as well as private litigants.

Of course, it's headlines news that Google (as well as its competitors) has already given in to pressure from a national government, by excluding censored content from its Chinese portal (Google.cn). Although so far the company has resisted a U.S. Department of Justice subpoena asking it to turn over logs for millions of recent search terms, smaller subpoenas -- such as those for the search history of a particular user's IP address -- don't make the news, because they're often sealed.

EFF staff attorney Kevin Bankston says that files on a service provider's computers, such as those stored by Google, would be easier for law enforcement to access because a subpoena would be issued to the provider, rather than the user. In some circumstances, as with Patriot Act requests, Google would not even be required to notify the user that their files were being turned over. Because of the secrecy of such investigations, it's impossible to know how many such subpoenas have actually been issued. However, says Bankston, "It's fair to assume that Google -- and all the other search engines -- have received and complied with this kind of request in the past."

"This is every text document on your computer that you've set Google to index," says Bankston. "Unless you've individually marked all of your private files [not to be indexed], you are going to be putting your most private data on Google's servers."

[1] 2 Next »

Comments

  • Privat lifes
    Guest (Maria) on 02/17/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Is this the "Big Brother"?
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Adios Google!
    Guest (Gabe) on 02/17/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Well, I was one of the very early adopters of Google - back then when no one ever heard about it. I would tell all my friends and colleagues about it.

    But things have changed - apparently Google is becoming evil really, really fast. I believe this is a trend, not just a few accidents on the road. It is a slippery slope, and not that I have any secrets to hide from the government, but this trend is really going in the wrong direction. Bye-bye Google! Maybe using other software will be harder and somewhat less efficient,  but at least I won't be supporting this "wolf-in-sheep's-clothes" company anymore.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Google
    Guest (Nevermind) on 02/18/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Unfortunately the internet functions to appease illegitimate and indiscriminate appetites. People gobble down anything new and free they see on the net without exercising the werewithal to discover what the risks are.

    Rarely do people take the time or invest the effort to learn about internet security, the security and integrity of their data, identity, or their own computer - and this fact bodes ill for privacy rights among other rights and considerations which are threatened by hidden agendas like the one detailed in this article.

    This is not to say everyone should aspire to being a security expert who uses the net, but they should consider the implications of any application or "Free" service which is offered them.

    There are no free rides - to think Google is offering one is naive. It's just that the cost may be hidden and ultimately - the price too high for these invasive technologies.
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review January/February 2009
Lifeline for Renewable Power
Without a radically expanded and smarter electrical grid, wind and solar will remain niche power sources.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology