Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Is GM's Volt Ready to Roll?

The production design is ready, but the electric vehicle's battery needs work.

By Kevin Bullis

Thursday, September 18, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

General Motors (GM) unveiled the production design of its Chevrolet Volt electric vehicle on Tuesday, as part of its 100th-anniversary celebration. But significant hurdles remain before the car can start rolling off assembly lines, chief among them the need for continued development of the car's main battery pack.

Volt unveiled: GM has revealed what its new electric car will look like.
Credit: General Motors

The Volt is an electric car that can be recharged by plugging it into a wall socket or by running a small, onboard gasoline, ethanol, or diesel generator. The 16-kilowatt-hour lithium-ion battery pack stores enough energy for 40 miles of driving--enough to cover almost 80 percent of the daily driving in the United States, the company says. On longer trips, the generator kicks in to recharge the battery, giving the Volt as much range between fill-ups as a typical gas-powered car. For more than a year, GM has been showing off the concept-car version of the Volt in ads. The new production version looks considerably different--it has a more aerodynamic shape--but it will have the same performance specifications that the automaker has been advertising.

Plug-in hybrid vehicles like the Volt began to seem feasible because of new technology that made lithium-ion batteries safer, more durable, and less costly. But while individual battery cells using the technology seem to work well, yoking nearly 300 of them into a battery pack has proved challenging. That, in turn, is forcing GM to design systems that make the vehicle more expensive. "At the cell level, things look good," says Mark Verbrugge, the director of the materials and processes laboratory at GM's research-and-development center. "There are still issues at the pack level that we're trying to iron out, which gets pretty nerve-racking as we get close to production."

A battery pack for an electric vehicle is complex. The cells have to be wired together to deliver power reliably, despite the harsh vibrations and jolts encountered on the road. (For an example of what can happen when things go wrong, see "Electric Cars 2.0.") Even a few defective cells or connections can dramatically lower the performance of the pack. What's more, the pack includes complex electronic controls for charging each cell, delivering power, and capturing energy from braking to improve vehicle efficiency. And maximizing the battery's life requires a good cooling system. To make matters worse, methods for testing whether a battery pack will last for the life of the car are only now being developed.

Story continues below

"There's only so much known about how to accelerate the testing of batteries," says Greg Cesiel, GM's program director for the E-Flex Vehicle Team, which is developing the Volt and related electric vehicles. Questions remain about how to simulate driving the car and charging the pack, and how to confirm that the pack will survive vibrations and exposure to hot and cold temperatures over the life of a vehicle.

"The big risk when it comes to putting these on the road is, we don't have accelerated life testing," Verbrugge says. "We have some at the cell level, which gives us enough confidence to say we're going to do this thing. But I would contend that's still the big risk."

Comments

  • a long and bumpy road
    I would suggest that anyone reading this article, as the subject matter always seems to draw a fair amount of interest, Google 'the history of electric vehicles.' While it appears that they have been around in one form or another since the early 1800's, and that they could have become a permanent part of the American automobile culture, there were a number of mitigating factors which were responsible for their eventual demise. I hope, as probably many of you do as well, that GM is successful in bringing the Volt to market and make the electric vehicle available as a viable alternative to the Infernal Combustion Engine once more.

    phoenix
    09/18/2008
    Posts:172
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: a long and bumpy road
      GM has made a major blunder here.

      The Volt, without the "plug-in" feature, is a 50 mpg series hybrid. A lot of people would be thrilled to own a much more muscular Prius, with better mileage.

      But GM overreached. The "plug-in" feature adds hundreds of pounds in weight, as well as a battery that is a major technical challenge. AND it will add as much as 20,000 to the sticker price of the car! Even if the Volt works, few people will pay 35-45k for a car just because it can go 40 miles without using gas.

      Series Hybrids are great. The Volt has a LOT going for it. But if GM (or other automakers) can dial it back, they'll have a major technical and commercial success. Removing the battery cost will make it competitive on price. And removing the weight can make the performance eye-popping.

      BTW, see http://www.choruscars.com for an explanation of the various drivetrains.

      isaiah@borea...
      09/18/2008
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: a long and bumpy road
        Take a close look at the Volt drive train, and you'll see that it doesn't work without the battery. The internal combustion motor on the Volt gets 50MPG because it's only expected to generate 53HP of power, and it's been tuned to operate optimally at that level. The battery is the key - run the engine at the avergage power needs, and then use the battery to provide any extra or soak up any excess energy. Take away the battery, and the engine has to rev up and down to match the needs when going faster and slower.

        Also, there was one item in the article that isn't completely accurate. It says that the internal compustion engine is there to 'recharge the battery'. That's not accurate, as it's only there to generate enough energy to keep the car moving and keep the battery charge from going below 30%. The reason for this is two-fold. First, you lose about 10% of the energy by charging and discharging the battery, so you want to put as little energy as possible into the battery. Second, the Volt costs about 2 cents/mile to run on battery and about 8 cents per mile to run on gasoline (even at 50MPG), so you always want to pull into your driveway with an empty battery so you can fill it up electrically, rather than using gasoline.

        swimdad623
        09/21/2008
        Posts:6
        Avg Rating:
        4/5

This discussion has been moved to our discussions forum.

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.