Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Thursday, August 28, 2008

Neutralizing Fluorocarbons

A new catalyst breaks down greenhouse gases and pollutants at room temperature.

By Nora Schultz

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Broken Apart: Researchers at Brandeis University used a silyium-carborane catalyst to break carbon-fluorine bonds at room temperature. This promises to make it easier and more effective to dispose of pollutants.
Credit: Oleg Ozerov

Fluorocarbons--common chemicals in which carbon is bound to fluorine--are potent greenhouse gases, and some form toxic compounds that can accumulate in the environment. But neutralizing fluorocarbons has required a process whose high temperature drives up its cost, limiting its adoption. Researchers at Brandeis University report in Science today that they have found a catalyst that breaks the carbon-fluorine bond at room temperature, promising easier and more effective disposal of pesky pollutants.

The strength of the fluorine-carbon bond makes fluorocarbons valuable in chemically resistant and durable materials such as stain repellants, nonstick cookware, and coolants. But it also explains why they are so difficult to dispose of. One type of fluorocarbon, the ozone-destroying chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), has now been widely banned under the Montreal Protocol, but the two other main types also present environmental problems.

One of them is now used instead of CFCs as a coolant in refrigerators and air-conditioning units. Where such refrigerants leak into the environment, they function as greenhouse gases that are a thousand times more potent than carbon dioxide.

Another type of fluorocarbon is used in many medical applications, including artificial blood. It, too, is a potent greenhouse gas and gets into the atmosphere as a by-product of the aluminum industry. But some species of it are also toxic and accumulate in the food chain, possibly increasing risk of cancer, birth defects, and other health problems.

Brandeis's Oleg Ozerov, lead researcher of the current Science study, found a way to crack the carbon-fluorine bond by using a silicon-based catalyst that recycles itself, so it can spark the breakdown reaction over and over again.

"The basic idea is that we use three things: the fluorocarbon, a silicon-based hydrogen source, and a catalyst which mediates between the two to replace the fluorine in the fluorocarbon with hydrogen," says Ozerov. "The active part of the catalyst is a positively charged silicon compound that kicks off the reaction by ripping the fluorine out of the fluorocarbon bond."

Having a fluorine ripped out, explains Ozerov, causes the former fluorocarbon to pull a hydrogen molecule out of the silicon-based material. Losing a hydrogen, in turn, transforms the silicon-based material into another instance of the catalyst, so the reaction can continue.

To get the initial catalyst to work, Ozerov and his colleague Christos Douvris had to stabilize it by partnering it with a very nonreactive, negatively charged ion that would interfere as little as possible with the target reaction.

[1] 2 Next »

Comments

  • Ozone Destroying?
    justahick on 08/31/2008 at 8:23 PM
    Posts:
    5
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    Hmm, since CFC's have been banned for so long, you would think that the ozone hole would be well on its way to being mended.

    Since it's not, and the hole's geometry seems to match the strength of the earth's magnetic field, which is in the process of reversing and is weakest where the ozone is thinnest, one would reasonably conclude that the science that claimed that CFCs were destroying the ozone were simply wrong.

    So, the article would seem to be perpetuating a myth. Is this a sample of what passes for education at MIT these days?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Ozone Destroying?
      travism on 09/02/2008 at 9:30 AM
      Posts:
      5
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      CFCs are going to be causing ozone depletion for quite some time.  The chemistry of ozone depletion is well known and has nothing to do with the Earth's magnetic field.  CFCs break up at high altitudes into chlorine which reacts with ozone, splitting the ozone up into plain oxygen then reverts back into chlorine and attacks more ozone molecules.  Quite a nasty example of catalysts in action.

      The fact that the chlorine stays up there causing ozone thinning for a long period of time does not mean stopping CFC use was pointless.  On the contrary...
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: Ozone Destroying?
        justahick on 09/08/2008 at 10:22 PM
        Posts:
        5
        Avg Rating:
        2/5
        You seem to have entirely missed my point about the ozone hole seeming to stay in one place in the world, almost exactly over the area where the earth's magnetic field is weakest.

        I'll try to be clearer: I've never seen an atmospheric chemical reaction that stayed over one region of the world for decades. But maybe those CFC's are just amazing catalysts...
        Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: Ozone Destroying?
          travism on 01/02/2009 at 12:07 AM
          Posts:
          5
          Avg Rating:
          3/5
          There are a couple of reasons why the ozone hole stays over the south pole (and southern countries like Australia).  One reason is because of the direction of winds and the types of clouds which form over the south pole, which have the effect of concentrating some pollutants like CFCs.

          The other is that ozone is formed by the reaction between oxygen and UV light.  It doesn't form in darkness and as you know the polar regions are dark during winter. 

          The CFCs remain though, destroying ozone made the previous summer.  Therefore, ozone levels plummet and are not replenished over winter whereas anywhere else in the world you have daily replenishment which at least partially offsets the effects of CFCs. 

          This means that the ozone hole reforms every winter above Antarctica then as wind directions change etc it gets blown North, stripping the UV protection from countries like Australia in time summer.
          Rate this comment: 12345
  • Hydrocarbons
    Flip on 09/08/2008 at 12:07 PM
    Posts:
    12
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    I'd like to know more about the hydrocarbons produced by the reaction. What are they exactly?
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review January/February 2009
Lifeline for Renewable Power
Without a radically expanded and smarter electrical grid, wind and solar will remain niche power sources.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology