Technology Review

Energy

Battling Cellulose

Insights into biomass could improve biofuel production.

  • September/October 2008
  • By Michelle Chang

Growing societal responsiveness to the long-term environmental impact of human activities has increased the drive to develop sustainable and ­carbon-­neutral approaches to energy production. One of the most attractive possible substitutes for petroleum-derived products, such as oil and commodity chemicals, is plant biomass.

Feedstocks such as corn and sugarcane have been bred over thousands of years for their capacity to store high levels of starch (in the case of corn kernels) or sucrose (in the case of sugarcane stalks). Current industrial processes for biofuel production depend on traditional methods of converting these ­simple but valuable sugar, starch, and oil feedstocks into liquid fuels, but these techniques often leave behind a large amount of more chemically complex agricultural material as waste.

The energy in biomass is derived by means of photosynthesis, in which plants use energy from the sun to synthesize carbohydrates from carbon dioxide and water. Thus, realizing the full potential of biofuels depends directly on utilizing more of the carbon or carbon dioxide equivalents found in biomass. Most of the carbon in a plant is stored as lignocellulosic biomass, which is typically considered crop residue. Made up of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin polymers, these parts of the plant evolved to protect and preserve the integrity of plant structures, so they are difficult to break down.

Existing strategies for processing and transforming this waste are limited, but many different ways of converting biomass to energy are under investigation. Much attention has focused on biological methods of breaking down lignocellulose into its constituent parts. Microbes and microbial communities have evolved to exploit biomass as a nutrient source, and they have developed enzymatic systems that degrade lignocellulose and metabolize the resulting molecules. But efforts to engineer microbes that can efficiently degrade lignocellulose will require more fundamental research on the way these complex systems function at a molecular level.

Advertisement

In parallel with this work, advances in functional plant genomics and engineering should lead to more rapid development of new crops with desirable energy-related traits, such as structurally modified cell walls that can be more easily degraded by emerging methods of lignocellulose processing.

Our laboratory is focused on elucidating the underlying design principles that explain complex chemical functions such as the multienzyme degradation of lignin. By combining fundamental biochemical studies with the tools of metabolic engineering and synthetic biology, we hope to learn how to rationally design new chemical functions in living systems.

More in Energy

Managing Energy

Read More »
Print

Related Articles

Boosting Cellulosic Biofuels

A catalytic process could improve thermochemical routes to ethanol.

Cellulosic Biofuels

Gregory Stephanopoulos explains challenges in converting biomass to biofuels.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Siphon

152 Comments

  • 1266 Days Ago
  • 08/26/2008

Forest Doom?

Will this spell the end for the big forests around the world?

Reply

mkogrady

423 Comments

  • 1265 Days Ago
  • 08/27/2008

Re: Forest Doom?

I suspect that the nature of these enzymes and the heat levels they become denatured will determine if they are a threat to living plants. If they shut down at 150F or higher like the enzymes used in the brewing industry, then a secondary heating element will be required to kill off the enzymes before they make it to the wild and infect large areas of land. On the otherhand, if this stuff shuts down in temps lower than 40 or 50 F then Fall and Winter temps will lessen the threat.

I also offer the following thought too - what if this stuff gets into the waterways and can survive in fresh or salt waters? If they can break down lignins in a controlled environment, will they also pose a threat elsewhere? No plants in the oceans means we lose a majority of our oxegen supply on a global basis, not to mention all those sea critters will be gasping for air and the food chain may be damaged.

Hopefully the labs folks are testing these scenario's.


Any comments from the labs?

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

BIND Biosciences

First Solar

Joule Unlimited

Goldwind Science and Technology

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement