|
Wednesday, April 16, 2008 Corn Primed for Making BiofuelResearchers genetically modify a crop to break down its own cellulose. By Alexandra M. Goho
In an effort to help boost the nation's supply of biofuels, researchers have created three strains of genetically modified corn to manufacture enzymes that break down the plant's cellulose into sugars that can be fermented into ethanol. Incorporating such enzymes directly into the plants could reduce the cost of converting cellulose into biofuel. Last year, new federal regulations called for production of renewable fuels to increase to 36 billion gallons annually--nearly five times current levels--by 2022. Today, nearly all fuel ethanol in the United States is produced from corn kernels. To meet the required increase, researchers are turning to other sources, such as cellulose, a complex carbohydrate found in all plants. Corn leaves and stems, prairie grasses, and wood chips are leading candidates for supplies of cellulose. Cellulosic ethanol has many advantages over that produced from corn kernels. Cellulose is not only extremely abundant and inexpensive; studies also suggest that the production and use of ethanol from cellulose could yield fewer greenhouse gases. However, the biggest obstacle to making cellulosic ethanol commercially feasible is the breakdown of cellulose. Enzymes that degrade cellulose, called cellulases, are typically produced by microbes grown inside large bioreactors, an expensive and energy-intensive process. "In order to make cellulosic ethanol really competitive, we really need to bring those costs down," says Michael J. Blaylock, vice president of system development at Edenspace, a crop biotechnology firm based in Manhattan, KS. Mariam Sticklen, professor of crop and soil science at Michigan State University, in East Lansing, figured that she could eliminate the cost of manufacturing enzymes by engineering corn plants to produce the enzymes themselves. Instead of relying on the energy-intensive process of producing them in bioreactors, "the plants use the free energy of the sun to produce the enzymes," she says. Typically, the breakdown of cellulose requires three different cellulases. Last year, Sticklen reported modifying corn with a gene for a cellulase that cuts the long cellulose chains into smaller pieces. The gene came from a microbe that lives in a hot spring. A month later, Sticklen inserted a gene derived from a soil fungus into the corn genome. That gene codes for an enzyme that breaks the smaller pieces of cellulose into pairs of glucose molecules. In this latest effort, Sticklen has modified corn to produce an enzyme that splits the glucose pairs into individual sugar molecules; the enzyme is naturally produced by a microbe that lives inside a cow's stomach. The final result: three strains of corn, each of which produces an enzyme essential to the complete breakdown of cellulose. To avoid the possibility of transferring the genes to other crops or wild plants, the enzymes are only produced in the plant's leaves and stems, not in its seeds, roots, or pollen, says Sticklen. What's more, to prevent the corn from digesting itself, she engineered the plants so that the enzymes accumulate only in special storage compartments inside the cells, called vacuoles. The cellulases are released only after the plant is harvested, during processing. Sticklen described her modified crops last week at the American Chemical Society's national meeting in New Orleans. |
Battling Ethanol-Propelled Food Prices
04/18/2008



Comments
RBGoulder on 04/16/2008 at 8:46 AM
1
camdaddy09 on 05/14/2008 at 1:54 PM
18
bj on 04/16/2008 at 10:01 AM
22
Meanwhile the food riots have started . . .
rhuarch on 04/16/2008 at 11:59 AM
1
greymase on 04/17/2008 at 1:38 PM
2
What I am somewhat less thrilled with is that it appears that farmers may not be able to convert this to energy on-site to run their farms as they are now by converting corn in on-site stills. I think decentralization and de-corporatization (small corps good, big corps, not so much) of energy is great and reduces costs. If this has to be shipped somewhere first, and then distributed, the returns on the energy input drop. I hope it can stay local - and this won't be put into a mega-corp that restricts its use.
nekote on 04/16/2008 at 1:08 PM
109
Congress enabled an uneconomical biofuels method via subsidies, mandates and protectionist tariffs on imports.
Now, fuel prices, food prices and taxes are higher than necessary.
Corn has gone from ~$2 a bushel to ~$6 a bushel.
Great for corn farmers / the corn "cartel".
And for corn state Senators / Reps.
Billions of tax dollars for the subsidies.
And one more special interest group lobbying Washington, to continue the status quo in their financial favor.
Corn to ethanol, while ever so well intentioned, is a stupid practice.
Leastwise, as currently practiced with the subsidies, mandates and tariffs.
ella on 04/16/2008 at 1:25 PM
1
Monsterboy on 04/16/2008 at 1:54 PM
53
bobinverness on 04/16/2008 at 2:58 PM
1
but then the 'green' nazis would object to any possible solution to the problem wouldn't they?
mkogrady on 04/17/2008 at 1:51 PM
72
As for a suggestion - make the enzymes work in simple lawn grass using a similar approach where each enzyme gets plugged in. Maybe Kentucky Blue Grass gets Enzyme A, while Fescue gets Enzyme B.
If done right, all our weekly lawn clippings become ethanol. The trick is to get a composter-widget setup in the yard so the ethanol collecting stays at home, otherwise setup some recovery program where homeowners get a credit to provide grass clippings to the local producer in exchange for a price break at the gas pump, or a write off at the end of the year for donating biomass to local businesses.
joelsapp on 05/30/2008 at 9:41 PM
1
This process seems best for switch grasses.
sirsnafu on 04/16/2008 at 2:05 PM
1
"To avoid the possibility of transferring the genes to other crops or wild plants, the enzymes are only produced in the plant's leaves and stems, not in its seeds, roots, or pollen,"
I believe this also means that it wont be in the corn that we eat. Its so that we can harvest the corn which is normal because they probably used a gene in the regulatory region that expresses the enzyme gene in the coding region to only be in the stems, they take the corn and instead of wasting all that extra plant that gets harvested, it can go to biofuel.
srudnick on 04/16/2008 at 2:38 PM
4
MakeSense on 04/19/2008 at 4:00 PM
61
srudnick on 04/21/2008 at 1:23 PM
4
In regards to worthiness of corn ethanol, your right, it is not a worthy long term answer. It is however a start down the road to energy independance with bio-ethanol as part of the answer for storable, portable fuel. Without corn ethanol and the infrastructure that will be developed with it we will years farther behind. We are already to far behind as it is.
Bribas on 04/16/2008 at 2:57 PM
1
mkogrady on 04/17/2008 at 1:53 PM
72
mkogrady on 04/16/2008 at 3:06 PM
72
Can this stuff power mass transit systems like light rail too!!!
killian on 04/17/2008 at 4:11 PM
54
desolation0 on 04/19/2008 at 11:28 AM
13
MakeSense on 04/19/2008 at 4:10 PM
61
It is a good idea to grow the enzymes for free. Oddly enough, Novozyme has brought the cost of fabricated enzymes for corn stover processing down to a quite low level, but this impacts overall costs mildly. Enzymes are just one of many obstacles to cellulosic ethanol that would need to be addressed.
I'll say it again. The least expensive, least energy intensive way to use biomass that conserves the greatest amount of original energy is burning it for electricity. That includes corn kernels. 75% of the energy content of corn kernels is used when they are burned as compared to less than 50% when converted to ethanol.
I also have doubts about genetic engineering. to alter plants in such arbitrary ways could be just what opportunistic microbes need to destroy the plant.
naturlm on 04/29/2008 at 2:00 AM
9
pepermintpatty on 04/30/2008 at 7:36 PM
1