Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Corn Primed for Making Biofuel

Researchers genetically modify a crop to break down its own cellulose.

By Alexandra M. Goho

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Shoots and leaves: To facilitate the breakdown of cellulose into fermentable sugars for making ethanol, Mariam Sticklen of Michigan State University is genetically modifying corn with genes that produce cellulose-degrading enzymes in the plant’s stems and leaves. The enzymes are activated only after the corn is harvested, when the plant is ground up.
Credit: Michigan State University

In an effort to help boost the nation's supply of biofuels, researchers have created three strains of genetically modified corn to manufacture enzymes that break down the plant's cellulose into sugars that can be fermented into ethanol. Incorporating such enzymes directly into the plants could reduce the cost of converting cellulose into biofuel.

Last year, new federal regulations called for production of renewable fuels to increase to 36 billion gallons annually--nearly five times current levels--by 2022. Today, nearly all fuel ethanol in the United States is produced from corn kernels. To meet the required increase, researchers are turning to other sources, such as cellulose, a complex carbohydrate found in all plants. Corn leaves and stems, prairie grasses, and wood chips are leading candidates for supplies of cellulose. Cellulosic ethanol has many advantages over that produced from corn kernels. Cellulose is not only extremely abundant and inexpensive; studies also suggest that the production and use of ethanol from cellulose could yield fewer greenhouse gases.

However, the biggest obstacle to making cellulosic ethanol commercially feasible is the breakdown of cellulose. Enzymes that degrade cellulose, called cellulases, are typically produced by microbes grown inside large bioreactors, an expensive and energy-intensive process. "In order to make cellulosic ethanol really competitive, we really need to bring those costs down," says Michael J. Blaylock, vice president of system development at Edenspace, a crop biotechnology firm based in Manhattan, KS.

Mariam Sticklen, professor of crop and soil science at Michigan State University, in East Lansing, figured that she could eliminate the cost of manufacturing enzymes by engineering corn plants to produce the enzymes themselves. Instead of relying on the energy-intensive process of producing them in bioreactors, "the plants use the free energy of the sun to produce the enzymes," she says.

Typically, the breakdown of cellulose requires three different cellulases. Last year, Sticklen reported modifying corn with a gene for a cellulase that cuts the long cellulose chains into smaller pieces. The gene came from a microbe that lives in a hot spring. A month later, Sticklen inserted a gene derived from a soil fungus into the corn genome. That gene codes for an enzyme that breaks the smaller pieces of cellulose into pairs of glucose molecules. In this latest effort, Sticklen has modified corn to produce an enzyme that splits the glucose pairs into individual sugar molecules; the enzyme is naturally produced by a microbe that lives inside a cow's stomach. The final result: three strains of corn, each of which produces an enzyme essential to the complete breakdown of cellulose.

To avoid the possibility of transferring the genes to other crops or wild plants, the enzymes are only produced in the plant's leaves and stems, not in its seeds, roots, or pollen, says Sticklen. What's more, to prevent the corn from digesting itself, she engineered the plants so that the enzymes accumulate only in special storage compartments inside the cells, called vacuoles. The cellulases are released only after the plant is harvested, during processing. Sticklen described her modified crops last week at the American Chemical Society's national meeting in New Orleans.

[1] 2 Next »

Comments

  • This is scary
    RBGoulder on 04/16/2008 at 8:46 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    Genetically altered corn that needs to be separated into 3 separate groups in order to allow for the easier and cheaper breakdown of cellulose. Just how does anyone think this separation can be maintained? How will it be kept separated from the food supply and why would anyone without a very myoptic point of view risk physical destruction of one of the world's most important food supplies. This is more irrational than anything I can think of. Just because it could be done is not a reason to do it.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: This is scary
      camdaddy09 on 05/14/2008 at 1:54 PM
      Posts:
      18
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      Why is there a problem she just said it couldnt be introduced into other corn. it wouldnt be in the kernels either so i dont see the harm in having a plant that can do this by itself.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Morgellon's Disease Redux, anyone?
    bj on 04/16/2008 at 10:01 AM
    Posts:
    22
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    Just what we need, more FrankenCrops to pollute the real food with its pollen. Oh, that's right, there is no real food anymore, it's all been engineered by Monsanto.

    Meanwhile the food riots have started . . .
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • No more Corn
    rhuarch on 04/16/2008 at 11:59 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    I don't have a problem with biofuels, but we have GOT to stop using corn for it.  There are better plants for this than corn, and the amount of corn being diverted to ethanol right now is already inflating food prices dramatically. Just imagine how bad it will be when production really gets ramped up.  Any industry that relies on corn, Dairy, Beef, Poultry, and many more that would surprise you will be affected with rising prices as the supply of corn is diverted to ethanol production.  
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: No more Corn
      greymase on 04/17/2008 at 1:38 PM
      Posts:
      2
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      I think that since this uses what would otherwise be classified as "bagasse" rather than the food portion of the plant, it may actually help stabilize food prices and reduce the need to trailblaze new farming land from old growth forests and rainforests. Each of these plants will be used 1) as food AND 2) as energy, instead of our current "either/or" model. With more incentive and non-government price support for growing this crop, food prices will stabilize due to higher supply, and energy will diversify, which pays dividends to all of us. Why riot about that?!?!?
      What I am somewhat less thrilled with is that it appears that farmers may not be able to convert this to energy on-site to run their farms as they are now by converting corn in on-site stills. I think decentralization and de-corporatization (small corps good, big corps, not so much) of energy is great and reduces costs.  If this has to be shipped somewhere first, and then distributed, the returns on the energy input drop. I hope it can stay local - and this won't be put into a mega-corp that restricts its use.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Corn to ethanol stupid
    nekote on 04/16/2008 at 1:08 PM
    Posts:
    109
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    Everybody wants biofuel alternatives to oil.
    Congress enabled an uneconomical biofuels method via subsidies, mandates and protectionist tariffs on imports.

    Now, fuel prices, food prices and taxes are higher than necessary.

    Corn has gone from ~$2 a bushel to ~$6 a bushel.
    Great for corn farmers / the corn "cartel".
    And for corn state Senators / Reps.

    Billions of tax dollars for the subsidies.

    And one more special interest group lobbying Washington, to continue the status quo in their financial favor.

    Corn to ethanol, while ever so well intentioned, is a stupid practice.
    Leastwise, as currently practiced with the subsidies, mandates and tariffs.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Right step
    ella on 04/16/2008 at 1:25 PM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    This really is not an issue about frankenfoods etc. This technology really does not represent an increase of GMO acerage but a technology that will help make energy production more efficient. Syngenta is close to releasing a corn product with an amylase gene inserted into it to lessen the cost of ethanol production. This technology is doing the same thing but for cellulosic biofuel production. I am all about renewable energy sources. This is a step in the right direction.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Why corn?
    Monsterboy on 04/16/2008 at 1:54 PM
    Posts:
    53
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    If they're modifying it so they can use the cellulose, why bother using corn at all?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Why corn?
      bobinverness on 04/16/2008 at 2:58 PM
      Posts:
      1
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      Because those who plant and process corn would profit from using the WHOLE plant. I supposer it might be possible to put the genes in other plants such as trees, grass, cactii. etc.
      but then the 'green' nazis would object to any possible solution to the problem wouldn't they?
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: Why corn?
        mkogrady on 04/17/2008 at 1:51 PM
        Posts:
        72
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
        Actually you have an interesting point - why just corn? Subsidies may be a huge factor since the USDA is tightly integrated into the Agri-Biz.

        As for a suggestion - make the enzymes work in simple lawn grass using a similar approach where each enzyme gets plugged in. Maybe Kentucky Blue Grass gets Enzyme A, while Fescue gets Enzyme B.

        If done right, all our weekly lawn clippings become ethanol. The trick is to get a composter-widget setup in the yard so the ethanol collecting stays at home, otherwise setup some recovery program where homeowners get a credit to provide grass clippings to the local producer in exchange for a price break at the gas pump, or a write off at the end of the year for donating biomass to local businesses.
        Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Why corn?
      joelsapp on 05/30/2008 at 9:41 PM
      Posts:
      1
      I agree. Modifying corn is not the answer. We are already seeing higher prices for corn because we are using it for non food purpose. Those people that are growing food corn, would have the knowledge on how to grow would switch to this more expensive crop. The risk of this genetically affecting our food corn is high as well. 

      This process seems best for switch grasses.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Did you read?
    sirsnafu on 04/16/2008 at 2:05 PM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    I had to make an account just to comment on your comments.
    "To avoid the possibility of transferring the genes to other crops or wild plants, the enzymes are only produced in the plant's leaves and stems, not in its seeds, roots, or pollen,"
    I believe this also means that it wont be in the corn that we eat. Its so that we can harvest the corn which is normal because they probably used a gene in the regulatory region that expresses the enzyme gene in the coding region to only be in the stems, they take the corn and instead of wasting all that extra plant that gets harvested, it can go to biofuel.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Corn is a stepping stone
    srudnick on 04/16/2008 at 2:38 PM
    Posts:
    4
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    By mastering the production of biofuels from a crop that our agriculture industry is highly experienced with, we can determine best practices for other less volatile crops.  Though food into fuel propositions are unfortunate and a hardship for all, they are only a transition phase in America's portable fuel economy.  When corn is no longer the best option prices will stabilize.  Government subsidies will no longer be politically sustainable after.  Big corn simply does not have the influence that big oil does.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Corn is a stepping stone
      MakeSense on 04/19/2008 at 4:00 PM
      Posts:
      61
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      I've never understood this "stepping stone" or "bridge" argument. Either corn ethanol is worth doing for its own sake or it's not. It's not.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: Corn is a stepping stone
        srudnick on 04/21/2008 at 1:23 PM
        Posts:
        4
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
             By beginning with a product you know and have completed extensive research on, you can further development very quickly.  Gains can then be bridged over to other products.  Starting with a product with less base knowledge amounts to reinventing the wheel.
             In regards to worthiness of corn ethanol, your right, it is not a worthy long term answer.  It is however a start down the road to energy independance with bio-ethanol as part of the answer for storable, portable fuel.  Without corn ethanol and the infrastructure that will be developed with it we will years farther behind.  We are already to far behind as it is.
        Rate this comment: 12345
  • What about hemp?
    Bribas on 04/16/2008 at 2:57 PM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    I don't understand what they don't use the hemp plant.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • This is damn clever!
    mkogrady on 04/16/2008 at 3:06 PM
    Posts:
    72
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    Nice work doc - it's great to see some innovation coming out of Michigan for a change. The Big three have been choking for years!

    Can this stuff power mass transit systems like light rail too!!!
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • conversion is not the big problem
    killian on 04/17/2008 at 4:11 PM
    Posts:
    54
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    There are three steps in converting sunlight into motion via plants: (1) photosynthesis to produce sugars and cellulose; (2) conversion of sugars and cellulose to a more convenient fuel; (3) burning that fuel to produce work.  This work addresses Step 2, but that is not the real bottleneck.  There seems to be a variety of methods to do this.  Step 1 is a problem, at least on the scale of of powering 3.9 trillion US vehicle miles in 2050.  Efficiencies of turning sunlight into chemical energy are only 0.38% for sugarcane, one of the best feedstocks.  Only algae (which might reach 4% efficiency??) looks promising, and this needs to be compared to 30% for sunlight to electricity.  Step 3 remains terribly inefficient, but requires little new technology.  The inefficiency of Step 3 (a typical ICE is 21% efficient) make the problem of Step 1 all the worse.  By comparison the conversion of electricity to work in an electric motor is above 90% efficient.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Why corn?
    desolation0 on 04/19/2008 at 11:28 AM
    Posts:
    13
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    Corn is the top-researched plant in the world. There are more studies on corn production than almost any other. Corn is also already the top food producing plant in America. It is seemingly much easier to tailor the crop you're already producing on more than half the farms to meet a new need than to find a new crop and get farmers to accept it for each individual job.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Not bad, but ...
    MakeSense on 04/19/2008 at 4:10 PM
    Posts:
    61
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    As I read the article, I had in mind the torrents of pretreatment. How much of these enzymes would survive the very caustic step that chemically rips lignin and hemicellulosic sheaths from the cellulose, detroying 50% of the feedstock? Fortunately the article made reference to this. I personally guess that much of enzymes would not survive.

    It is a good idea to grow the enzymes for free. Oddly enough, Novozyme has brought the cost of fabricated enzymes for corn stover processing down to a quite low level, but this impacts overall costs mildly. Enzymes are just one of many obstacles to cellulosic ethanol that would need to be addressed.

    I'll say it again. The least expensive, least energy intensive way to use biomass that conserves the greatest amount of original energy is burning it for electricity. That includes corn kernels. 75% of the energy content of corn kernels is used when they are burned as compared to less than 50% when converted to ethanol.

    I also have doubts about genetic engineering. to alter plants in such arbitrary ways could be just what opportunistic microbes need to destroy the plant.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Burning Kernal Corn
    naturlm on 04/29/2008 at 2:00 AM
    Posts:
    9
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    How about a steam powered car that burns kernal corn, ie. continuously burn corn kernals to produce steam to drive a turbine or piston steam engine. Better yet, lets make the steam with a tankload of powdered coal.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • biofuel corn
    pepermintpatty on 04/30/2008 at 7:36 PM
    Posts:
    1
    I want to know what feeding the byproduct of this corn to the cattle does to the meat you eat???
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review July/August 2008
The Business of Social Networks
The future of the Web is social. But can social-networking sites ever make money?
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology