|
Thursday, March 13, 2008 Toward Cheaper, Robust Solar CellsResearchers are working on solar cells that use a novel organic dye. By Prachi Patel-Predd
Cheap and easy-to-make dye-sensitized solar cells are still in the early stages of commercial production. Meanwhile, their inventor, Michael Gratzel, is working on more advanced versions of them. In a paper published in the online edition of Angewandte Chemie, Gratzel, a chemistry professor at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland, presents a version of dye-sensitized cells that could be more robust and even cheaper to make than current versions. Dye-sensitized solar cells consist of titanium oxide nanocrystals that are coated with light-absorbing dye molecules and immersed in an electrolyte solution, which is sandwiched between two glass plates or embedded in plastic. Light striking the dye frees electrons and creates "holes"--the areas of positive charge that result when electrons are lost. The semiconducting titanium dioxide particles collect the electrons and transfer them to an external circuit, producing an electric current. These solar cells are cheaper to make than conventional silicon photovoltaic panels. In principle, they could be used to make power-generating windows and building facades, and they could even be incorporated into clothing. (See "Window Power" and "Solar Cells for Cheap.") A Lowell, MA-based company called Konarka is manufacturing dye-sensitized solar cells in a limited quantity. But the technology still has room for improvement. In existing versions of the solar cells, the electrolyte solution uses organic solvents. When the solar cells reach high temperatures, the solvent can evaporate and start to leak out. Researchers are now looking at a type of material that may make a better electrolyte: ionic liquids, which are currently used as industrial solvents. These liquids do not evaporate at solar-cell operating temperatures. "Ionic liquids are less volatile and more robust," says Bruce Parkinson, a chemistry professor at Colorado State University. New dyes are also being investigated. In commercial cells, the dyes are made of the precious metal ruthenium. But researchers have recently started to consider organic molecules as an alternative. "Organic dyes will become important because they can be cheaply made," Gratzel says. In the long run, they might also be more abundant than ruthenium. |
More-Powerful Solar Cells
03/27/2008



Comments
nekote on 03/13/2008 at 6:18 AM
115
What's it all translate to, in delivered $/KWH.
DJTal on 03/13/2008 at 8:44 AM
116
Note to self : Remember to give self a five star rating for this comment .
protn7 on 03/13/2008 at 3:14 PM
19
GreenPlease on 03/16/2008 at 7:29 PM
7
Using solar energy to drive a heat engine is a dandy idea but the problem is achieving adequate Carnot efficiencies, power densities, and capital efficiency ($/W). With no/low concentrations this does not appear to be an achievable goal. High concentration units, however, perform well with this concept.
DJTal on 03/17/2008 at 4:17 AM
116
RD on 03/13/2008 at 10:49 AM
50
GaryB on 03/13/2008 at 2:16 PM
42
If there were a serious commitment to get there, 2X doesn't seem that hard -- worth a moon shot kind of effort considering the possible consequences of having to rely on coal to meet our future energy needs.
I wish the candidates would start debating this instead of whether OB is sexist or Hillary is racist or McCain is holy enough.
protn7 on 03/13/2008 at 2:44 PM
19
protn7 on 03/13/2008 at 2:50 PM
19
DJTal on 03/14/2008 at 4:14 AM
116
jaggspb on 03/14/2008 at 8:50 AM
9
Siphon on 03/28/2008 at 12:51 PM
94
Amorphous diamond could be over 50% efficient, and possibly be very cheap. It's hypothetical at this point of course, but the science is valid. Cooling under higher concentrations would be easier due to the high temperature resistance and extraordinary conductivity of diamond.
Infrared nano antennas could be 80%, but as of yet no practical 'inverter' has been found. Maybe capacitors.
The theoretical limit to the photovoltaic effect is around 97-98%, but for a long time to come there will be material constraints that prohibit approaching those levels, especially in a commercial product.
N O M on 08/20/2008 at 1:07 AM
7
ronwagn on 03/17/2008 at 11:50 PM
10
Siphon on 03/28/2008 at 12:57 PM
94
It could be a great idea if electrical storage becomes cheaper. Superconducting magnetic storage, ultracaps etc. My favorite is no-fuel CAES as this could prove to be efficient and quite workable.
I prefer trying to increase the efficiency of the power block though, so the cheap storage benefit of solar thermal remains exploitable. Maybe those infrared nano antennas or more efficient thermoelectrics...