|
March/April 2008 TR10: Wireless PowerPhysicist Marin Soljacic is working toward a world of wireless electricity. By Jennifer Chu
In the late 19th century, the realization that electricity could be coaxed to light up a bulb prompted a mad dash to determine the best way to distribute it. At the head of the pack was inventor Nikola Tesla, who had a grand scheme to beam electricity around the world. Having difficulty imagining a vast infrastructure of wires extending into every city, building, and room, Tesla figured that wireless was the way to go. He drew up plans for a tower, about 57 meters tall, that he claimed would transmit power to points kilometers away, and even started to build one on Long Island. Though his team did some tests, funding ran out before the tower was completed. The promise of airborne power faded rapidly as the industrial world proved willing to wire up. Then, a few years ago, Marin Soljačić, an assistant professor of physics at MIT, was dragged out of bed by the insistent beeping of a cell phone. "This one didn't want to stop until you plugged it in for charging," says Soljačić. In his exhausted state, he wished the phone would just begin charging itself as soon as it was brought into the house. So Soljačić started searching for ways to transmit power wirelessly. Instead of pursuing a long-distance scheme like Tesla's, he decided to look for midrange power transmission methods that could charge--or even power--portable devices such as cell phones, PDAs, and laptops. He considered using radio waves, which effectively send information through the air, but found that most of their energy would be lost in space. More-targeted methods like lasers require a clear line of sight--and could have harmful effects on anything in their way. So Soljačić sought a method that was both efficient--able to directly power receivers without dissipating energy to the surroundings--and safe. He eventually landed on the phenomenon of resonant coupling, in which two objects tuned to the same frequency exchange energy strongly but interact only weakly with other objects. A classic example is a set of wine glasses, each filled to a different level so that it vibrates at a different sound frequency. If a singer hits a pitch that matches the frequency of one glass, the glass might absorb so much acoustic energy that it will shatter; the other glasses remain unaffected. Soljačić found magnetic resonance a promising means of electricity transfer because magnetic fields travel freely through air yet have little effect on the environment or, at the appropriate frequencies, on living beings. Working with MIT physics professors John Joannopoulos and Peter Fisher and three students, he devised a simple setup that wirelessly powered a 60-watt light bulb. The researchers built two resonant copper coils and hung them from the ceiling, about two meters apart. When they plugged one coil into the wall, alternating current flowed through it, creating a magnetic field. The second coil, tuned to the same frequency and hooked to a light bulb, resonated with the magnetic field, generating an electric current that lit up the bulb--even with a thin wall between the coils. |
Recharging Gadgets Wirelessly
12/13/2007



Comments
drthompson on 02/19/2008 at 9:51 AM
3
Namdac on 08/23/2008 at 6:17 PM
1
bseddon on 02/21/2008 at 5:34 AM
1
GaryB on 02/24/2008 at 7:41 PM
42
There might be some concerns with EM radiation ... but in the article this is tuned resonance, presumably not tuned for human flesh ... and I never quite believe/believed that non-ionizing radiation (EM) can have an effect on the body short of a hugely powerful field since it sort of lacks a cause (cancer by scary magic).
As far as I know most meta-studies end up debunking EM as a cancer risk such as living close to high power lines -- no cancer risk.
pradeepa.gn on 03/28/2008 at 4:53 AM
1
danimalia on 02/22/2008 at 3:09 AM
4
Its a very wasteful way to charge things up, besides. Also, who wants to share a room with a device constantly zapping you with powerful EM waves? I dont.
falcon on 02/24/2008 at 2:37 PM
1
ofoehr on 02/26/2008 at 1:43 AM
1
rabber on 02/26/2008 at 8:50 AM
2
MakeSense on 04/13/2008 at 10:21 AM
67
pierrestm on 02/26/2008 at 9:58 AM
1
Here's his website for more details about his work. Some books, videos and working kits are available for demonstrations purposes...
http://www.meyl.eu/go/index.php?dir=10_Home&page=1&sublevel=0
wcfloyd on 02/26/2008 at 11:43 AM
3
jeeves on 03/06/2008 at 11:51 AM
1
b4b2 on 03/06/2008 at 6:37 PM
9
Bury a coil under parking spots (maybe hang them up somewhere?) and charge your car while you shop!
Just some thoughts.
optikos on 03/12/2008 at 10:32 PM
1
Once this technology is widely deployed, imagine building 1.5 to 2 times as many COAL-fired or NUCLEAR-powered power-generating plants. (Literally, pick your poison, please.) Perhaps I can interest you in having a nuclear or coal power plant built literally across the street from your house? They are really beatiful additions to your neighborhood!
Also my $200 to $300 per month electric bill is not high enough. I would like it to be 1.5 to 2 times bigger per month. Oh yeah! $300 to $600 per month! That's what we all want!
And for those of you who say only toothbrushes and cell phones will have this technology, think again. Once it is cool to have wireless power, everything that takes less power than an oven or an air conditioner will be powered wirelessly. It will get to where premium-priced wireless-powered products dominate over low-end wire-powered because they will command higher profit margins for the manufacturer and will bestow not only coolness but also be a status symbol of how large of a monthly electric bill the buyer can afford. Therefore, wasted electricity that is raditated in all the wrong directions due to wireless-powered products will be a major percentage of the monthly electric bill and a major cause of building more electricity-generating plants.
BenAthar on 08/23/2008 at 11:29 AM
1
If this could be done and still have less loss, then I could see this as an ideal way to use electricity. We are now (the US in particular) are starting to use more solar, wind and thermal means to power our homes. It can be done, but the technology and the people trying to come up with the ideas and ways to make such things a reality are limited. Time is what is helping make such things a reality. Even though it might be at least 100 years later, the thought is still working and continuing.
sculptor on 03/23/2008 at 2:19 AM
8
b.dutta.ee on 03/31/2008 at 8:19 AM
1
about powering all the home devices including tvs, bulbs and other fixed items wirelessly with a
such a inefficient method (particularly when the energy prices are going up!). Mobile phones and
defence applications seem realistic.
Anyways I feel that the brains at MIT should focus
more on solving more complex technical issues then revisitng old known ones (which anyways many companies are doing), unless of course they are making some revolutionary new approach which is kept unpublished.
kfakfa on 04/11/2008 at 3:40 PM
1
I'd like to see some specific absorption rate estimations for the heating effects of biological tissues caused by the rf magnetic fields involved. In MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) an rf field strength of only 30 microteslas at 64 MHz might be large enough to be of concern even when pulsed at 5 % duty cycle. I'd be very careful in the vicinity of a transmission coil putting out a continuous rf field of 100 microteslas.
The biological effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields at rf frequencies is a hot subject these days. The national limits of rf magnetic fields and specific absorption rates are quite low for the general population. The safety concerns should be taken into account already by the scientists involved with the project in the test laboratory.
CokeClassic21 on 05/26/2008 at 4:53 AM
1
Laverne on 07/22/2008 at 4:32 PM
1
I want to hear more from those who are experimenting with the electomagnetic field that surrounds the earth and getting energy directly from that! No coal or gas fired plants, no high AC electric bills, etc. We should be able to make a receiver for that type of energy, on a small enough scale for powering homes, businesses, vehicles, and more! Even the lightning rods on our homes powered oldtime crystal radio sets so that we could hear radio transmisions.
Health issues??? I am experienced in the total exhaustion in the morning caused by sleeping in the magnetic field created by a waterbed heater...I vowed never to do that again! This made me realize how our bodies are affected by our government approved electrical wiring in our homes. I always feel more alive when there's no electrical current flowing and creating magnetic fields that hinder my Na+, Cl-, K+, etc. ions in my muscles. So, if you want to be more energetic, turn the lights, TV, refrigerator, air conditioning OFF. :) Now, I know that that is drastic, but try it! You'll like it. :)
Meanwhile, why use scare tactics about Tesla's energy transmissions when he used HF anyway?? You need a higher frequency than RF (radio frequency) to get more power per wave. Go there, and let me know what happens. Who knows, maybe infrared or planetary / solar frequencies may be the next electric source? Free, clean, safe...they are coming our way no matter what, so we might as well use it!
Laverne
kvenvold on 07/22/2008 at 9:59 PM
1
I was recently laid off from my present job and had the opportunity to interview with the people at WiTricity. This experience revived my interest in solving the wireless power issue. Since I have time to tinker, I have recently developed a prototype wireless flat screen TV. My previous job was designing flat screens for media applications, so I had the parts.
I am now working on making it more efficient, I have found that increasing the frequency of the transmission increases the length of transmission as well as the efficiency. I have a ways to go, but it’s a start and it works. As for the health issues, short range transmissions are harmless.
Health issues with longer range transmissions will have to be determined.
Stuball on 08/01/2008 at 10:08 PM
1
mhydeis on 08/23/2008 at 1:05 PM
1