|
March/April 2008 Ethanol from Garbage and Old TiresA versatile new process for making biofuels could slash their cost. By Kevin Bullis
As he leads a tour of the labs at Coskata, a startup based in Warrenville, IL, Richard Tobey, the company's vice president of research and development, pauses in front of a pair of clear plastic tubes packed with bundles of white fibers. The tubes are the core of a bioreactor, which is itself the heart of a new technology that Coskata claims can make ethanol out of wood chips, household garbage, grass, and old tires--indeed, just about any organic material. The bioreactor, Tobey explains, allows the company to combine thermochemical and biological approaches to synthesizing ethanol. Taking advantage of both, he says, makes Coskata's process cheaper and more versatile than either the technologies widely used today to make ethanol from corn or the experimental processes designed to work with sources other than corn. Tobey's tour begins at the far end of the laboratory in two small rooms full of pipes, throbbing pumps, and pressurized tanks--all used to process synthesis gas (also known as syngas), a mixture of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen. This is the thermochemical part of Coskata's process: in a well-known technique called gasification, a series of chemical reactions carried out at high temperatures can produce syngas from almost any organic material. Ordinarily, chemical catalysts are then used to convert the syngas into a mixture of alcohols that includes ethanol. But making such a mixture is intrinsically inefficient: the carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen that go into the other alcohols could, in principle, have gone into ethanol instead. So this is where Coskata turns from chemistry to biology, using microbes to convert the syngas to ethanol more efficiently. Down the hall from the syngas-processing equipment, Tobey shows off the petri dishes, flasks, and sealed hoods used to develop species of bacteria that eat syngas. The bioreactors sit at the far end of the room. Inside the bioreactors' tubes, syngas is fed directly to the bacteria, which produce a steady stream of ethanol. Coskata's technology could be a big deal. Today, almost all ethanol made in the United States comes from corn grain; because cultivating corn requires a lot of land, water, and energy, corn-derived ethanol does little to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions and can actually cause other environmental damage, such as water pollution. Alternative ethanol sources, such as switchgrass, wood chips, and municipal waste, would require far fewer resources. But so far, technology for processing such materials has proved very expensive. That's why Coskata's low-cost technique has caught the attention of major investors, including General Motors, which earlier this year announced a partnership with the startup to help deploy its technology on the commercial scale worldwide. Sipping Ethanol The thin fibers packed into the bioreactor serve two functions. First, they act as scaffolding: the bacteria grow in biofilms on the outside of the fibers. Second, they serve as a delivery mechanism for the syngas. Even though each fiber is not much bigger than a human hair, Tobey says, it acts like a tiny plastic straw. The researchers pump syngas down the bores of the hollow fibers, and it diffuses through the fiber walls to reach the bacteria. Water flows around the outside of the fibers, delivering vitamins and amino acids to the bacteria and carrying away the ethanol the bacteria produce. But the water and the syngas, Tobey says, never meet. |
Garbage In, Megawatts Out
07/02/2008




Comments
kamatajith on 02/23/2008 at 7:39 AM
2
kamat.ajith@gmail.com
+91 98448 97210
aylesmerep on 03/10/2008 at 6:51 AM
2
ChuckInReno on 03/11/2008 at 1:28 PM
10
username on 03/07/2008 at 12:20 PM
1
Sazhu on 03/10/2008 at 10:59 AM
2
bbesler on 03/13/2008 at 1:08 PM
2
A. Is the biological method of producing ethanol more energy efficient than using a chemical catalysis based method (Fischer Tropsch synthesis)? If FT synthesis were more efficient and it produced a mixture of alcohols what difference would it make if it were to be mixed with gasoline and used as auto fuel.
B. It is possible to produce 1-butanol from synthesis gas using the right species of bateria (Clostiridium carboxydirovans). Would butanol be better since it is closer in properties to gasoline(cars can use it in high percentage blends with gasoline without modification)? Also butanol/gasoline blends could be mixed at oil refineries and transported via pipline.
bbesler on 03/13/2008 at 1:29 PM
2