Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Tuesday, January 15, 2008

The New CAFE Standards

Fuel standards will likely be achievable but won't encourage innovation.

By Peter Fairley

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Small changes: New fuel-economy standards won’t drive plug-in electric vehicles, such as this three-door hatchback from ZENN Motor Company, into the market. But lower-profile R&D incentives and manufacturing supports in the same legislation could jump-start the process.
Credit: Electric Drive Transportation Association

The 40 percent increase in the U.S. fuel-economy standard to 35 miles per gallon by 2020, which Congress passed last month, could be a significant step toward trimming U.S. drivers' increasing greenhouse-gas emissions and dependence on imported oil. But energy experts say that the new technologies required to meet the new standards are minimal. Instead, they say that lesser-known provisions in the Energy Independence and Security Act could have a far greater impact on spurring the development of new technologies, such as plug-in electric vehicles.

The new law tightens Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards that regulate the average fuel economy in the vehicles produced by each major automaker. The current CAFE standard for cars, set in 1984, requires manufacturers to achieve an average of 27.5 miles per gallon, while a second CAFE standard requires an average of 22.2 miles per gallon for light trucks such as minivans, sport utility vehicles, and pickups. The new rules require that these standards be increased such that, by 2020, the new cars and light trucks sold each year deliver a combined fleet average of 35 miles per gallon.

Raising fuel economy by 10 miles per gallon nationwide will deliver real benefits. The Union of Concerned Scientists, for example, estimates that it will save 1.1 million barrels of oil per day in 2020--about half of what the United States imports from the Persian Gulf. That should deliver a reduction in greenhouse gases equivalent to taking 28 million of today's cars and trucks off the road. Nevertheless, Jim Kliesch, a senior engineer with the Union of Concerned Scientists, in Washington, DC, projects that these savings will be largely negated in 2020 by increased driving.

"Fuel-economy policy in this country had been stagnating for decades, and getting a minimum of 35 mpg by 2020 is a critical first step, but if we want to achieve a sustainable transportation system, it's going to take much more," says Kliesch.

Analysts like Kliesch do expect automakers to produce more advanced diesel vehicles and hybrids in the coming decade, both in response to tightening fuel-economy rules and for strategic and marketing reasons. But reports by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, think tanks, and activists show that a combination of existing efficiency options, such as continuously variable transmissions and better tires, can cheaply and easily deliver a 35-miles-per-gallon fleet. (See "Why Not a 40-MPG SUV?")

Indeed, Europe currently requires 40 miles per gallon average fuel economy and will soon push up to 49 miles per gallon, while Japan is expected to reach 47 miles per gallon in its 2015 standard. Greenhouse-gas regulations developed by California (and adopted by many other states) may soon eclipse CAFE in the United States. Last month, the Environmental Protection Agency rejected California's petition to impose its own standards, arguing that the state rules delivered the equivalent of just 33.5 miles per gallon, but California officials shot back with their own analysis early this month. They estimated that the state standard would yield 35 miles per gallon from new cars by about 2016--four years ahead of CAFE.

[1] 2 Next »

Comments

  • New Cafe Standards
    olmon on 01/15/2008 at 2:54 AM
    Posts:
    9
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    This whole deal is a BAD joke. There is so much currently usable technology that the auto manufacturers could double the mileage figures on every model they have by next year without breaking a sweat. The technology has been available for the past 30+ years to have the typical passenger car to be capable not only of double to triple the current MPG figures but also to have better performance.
    The only way they get away with the BS that is being dished out is because the general public is so ignorant of any and all technology advances that actually have and are being made.
    http://www.3wheelers.com/fuelva.html
    http://www.fev-now.com/index.php?page=xr3_hybrid
    http://www.valentintechnologies.com/concept/default.asp
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: New Cafe Standards
      gabrielg01 on 01/15/2008 at 9:51 AM
      Posts:
      317
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      So true! In fact, we don't even need to deploy any new technology to achieve these fuel standards. If Europe has a 40 mpg fuel standard today, as the article says, then all we have to do is build cars to the European standards. Mind you, these car companies are global, so they have the know-how, the licenses, everything they need to increase fuel efficiency now. But they just simply don't want to improve the fuel economy. They are so utterly disgusting. They opposed even the current increase in efficiency.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • NON imported oil? Nope.
        lkrndu on 01/15/2008 at 10:21 AM
        Posts:
        19
        Avg Rating:
        2/5
        It's even worse than what the preceding comments convey. The trap is in this phrase in the article's very first sentence: '...a significant step toward trimming U.S. drivers' increasing greenhouse-gas emissions and dependence on imported oil.'

        Nunnh-unnh. Won't be like that. QUADRUPLING fuel economy won't do it. Because? The supply of NON-imported oil is DECREASING. The US passed 'peak' in petroleum development -- oh -- way back in 1970 or so.

        All of this is nutz.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: NON imported oil? Nope.
          RD on 01/15/2008 at 12:42 PM
          Posts:
          58
          Avg Rating:
          3/5
          US has 800 billion barrels of recoverable, high quality shale oil in the Rockies that would cost about $20-30/barrel to recover with thermal in-situ, CO2 injection technology per the Rand Institute 2005 Study.  What we lack is the political will.
          Rate this comment: 12345
          • Re: NON imported oil? Nope.
            ChuckInReno on 01/16/2008 at 1:41 AM
            Posts:
            19
            Avg Rating:
            3/5
            Shale oil in the Green River formation will be developed. It's coming. See http://money.cnn.com/2007/10/30/magazines/fortune/Oil_from_stone.fortune/index.htm for some background.
            Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: NON imported oil? Nope.
          nibbircii on 01/16/2008 at 12:43 PM
          Posts:
          2
          Avg Rating:
          3/5
          Oil is a globally priced commodity, so to reduce the price in the US you really must decrease the price globally. You won't do this by making people drive tiny 50 mpg cars. Not with the Chinese and Indian economies growing the way they are.
          The answer is to find more oil and stabilize the value of the dollar.
          Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: New Cafe Standards
        ricke8592 on 01/15/2008 at 10:59 AM
        Posts:
        2
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        Remember, politicians do not "create" anything. All they can really do is throw our money at something and hope it causes the desired change.  But public laws do not change the natural laws of supply and demand.  Other posters are right in that increasing CAFE does not solve the basic problem; at best it just delays (or extends, depending upon your point of view) the pain a bit.  The transition to a non oil based economy will happen. The only remaining question is whether it will be a smooth one, or a messy one.
        Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: New Cafe Standards
      azwaverider on 04/21/2008 at 1:28 PM
      Posts:
      1
      Avg Rating:
      1/5
      The cars of the 70s: Datsun, Toyota, Dodge had the omni, Fiat, Volkswagon...all got good milage. I had a 68 Opal that got 35mpg city driving! The technology IS here and Nixon forced them to use it, Bush won't because he and his buddies haven't made enough money yet. Why did they offer the farm equipment replacement tax credits to the general public to buy oversized vehicles?

      In the last decade this NASCAR/redneck mentality has created a society of bigger, bigger, bigger. Why do all our vehicles have to look like they're on steroids or peddle cars?
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Reduce octane to increase gas supply
    RD on 01/15/2008 at 12:31 PM
    Posts:
    58
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    The ultimate goal is to use less oil, which doesn't always translate into higher CAFE standards. If all oil companies reduced the octane rating of their finest premiums from 93 to 92, it would increase the nation's gasoline production efficiency by roughly 2 percent—or, in laymen's terms, it would enable us to squeeze another 182,000 barrels of usable gasoline out of our crude oil supply each day. Over a full year, the reduction would save us about 143.1 million barrels of oil annually—enough to satisfy our national oil demand for about seven days. How about having all cars designed to run on 87 octane and eliminate the higher octanes?
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • America fails again .
    DJTal on 01/17/2008 at 4:11 AM
    Posts:
    116
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    For a country and president that supposedly believes in technological solutions to the problem of global warming this legislation is an abismal failure to act . In a country where people regularly drive long distances , why would any american motorists mind having vehicles with the very best miles per gallon , or does the government WANT people to consume more fuel .
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • As for drilling for new oil...
    lasertekk on 01/23/2008 at 10:36 AM
    Posts:
    27
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    Not to get political, but the mistake currently occupying the White House did make one correct statement:  We are addicted to oil.  Drilling for new oil is like a drug addict dumping his present supplier and finding another.  Nothing gets solved.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Bigger Problems than Cars
    Bruce in CO on 02/01/2008 at 5:17 PM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
    More than half of the oil used worldwide is for non-transportation purposes, such as plastics and other raw materials.  Look around where you are currently sitting and see if there is anything near you that isn't made out of a petroleum derivative.  There won't be much - even the varnish on the wooden bookshelves probably use oil.  Anyway, focusing on CAFE standards while ignoring everything else will not solve the imported oil issue.  I believe it was a Saudi prince who once said something along the lines of "it's okay if you stop using gas for your cars, we are more than happy to sell you the raw materials for all of your products."
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review January/February 2009
Lifeline for Renewable Power
Without a radically expanded and smarter electrical grid, wind and solar will remain niche power sources.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology