Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
« Back 1 [2]

Monday, November 26, 2007

Making Fuel from Leftovers

Continued from page 1

By Jennifer Chu

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The entire process generated 288 percent more energy than the electricity required to produce the reaction. Logan and his colleagues estimate that, compared with conventional electrolysis, which has a 60 percent efficiency rate, BEAMR achieved an 82 percent efficiency rate.

Logan says that his recent experiment shows that acetic acid could be a rich source of hydrogen-generating material under specific conditions. This suggests that researchers may be able to get more hydrogen out of biomass than was previously thought. Another implication from the study: cellulose may turn out to be better suited for hydrogen production than ethanol fuel is because using cellulose for ethanol involves a more complicated process.

"If you think of cellulose as a starting material to make ethanol, people have to add enzymes to break it down to sugars, and then those can be fermented into ethanol," says Logan. "But we can use cellulose directly to make hydrogen."

He says that a potential first application for the technology may be in powering farms, wastewater treatment plants, and other facilities with large amounts of unused biomass. However, scaling BEAMR up to commercial applications may take some rejiggering. The materials used in the system, particularly the platinum cathode in the reactor, would be very expensive if manufactured at a large scale. In the future, Logan's lab plans to reduce the cost of the reactor's components, and it has already started looking for alternatives to platinum.

Lars Angenent, assistant professor in the Department of Energy, Environmental, and Chemical Engineering at Washington University, works to optimize fermentation processes to produce bioenergy. He says that while Logan's technology successfully "circumvents biological limitations of hydrogen production," bringing it to a commercial level may pose challenges.

"Scale-up will be the problem," says Angenent. "This must be commercially viable while sustaining high efficiencies."

« Back 1 [2]

Comments

  • how does it compare?
    killian on 11/26/2007 at 7:49 PM
    Posts:
    54
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    It would be helpful to know how the process compares to anaerobic digestion by microbes to produce CH4.  CH4 is pretty similar to H2 as a fuel.  Which process has a higher energy yield?
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • why compare ??
    hano on 05/31/2008 at 6:50 PM
    Posts:
    3
    This isn't about whats better, it is about whats there now and the availability on the cheapest scale and what is the cheapest and easiest option for the public to utilize without changing too much. It is about what fits easiest, cheapest, and smartest into our lives now not in 50 years time when we got other options. I mean how available is CH4 how can we get it in large scale and cheaply?
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology