Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Monday, November 26, 2007

Making Fuel from Leftovers

Researchers have designed a process to generate hydrogen from organic materials.

By Jennifer Chu

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Waste not: A microbial electrolysis cell (left) uses bacteria to convert organic materials into hydrogen, with a boost from a small external power source (right).
Credit: Photograph by Shaoan Cheng, Penn State University

Unsure what to do with your Thanksgiving leftovers? According to Penn State University (PSU) researchers, feeding table scraps to bacteria may be a clean and efficient way to produce hydrogen that can be used as fuel. Bruce Logan, Kappe professor of environmental engineering, and his colleagues at PSU have designed a tabletop reactor that uses bacteria to break down biodegradable organic material. Adding a small jolt of energy to the system causes hydrogen gas to bubble up to the surface. Logan says that this biological process--compared with today's existing techniques--may be a more sustainable and efficient alternative for generating hydrogen.

The promise of hydrogen as a fuel source has led major automakers like BMW, Daimler Chrysler, Ford, and Toyota to develop test cars that run on hydrogen-powered fuel cells. These fuel cells convert hydrogen and oxygen into electricity, giving off water as a byproduct. It's a zero-emissions model that could vastly reduce reliance on polluting fossil fuels. But there's a catch: generating hydrogen itself can involve the burning of fossil fuels like natural gas. Cleaner methods of producing hydrogen include using geothermal, wind, and solar energy to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen, in a process called electrolysis. However, these processes are expensive and require large amounts of electricity. If scaled up, these methods could prove very inefficient.

Some scientists have concentrated on creating microbial fuel cells--reactors that use bacteria to catalyze reactions that produce electricity. Logan's lab found a way to improve on existing microbial fuel cells by breaking down end products, such as acetic acid.

The researchers grew bacteria in a specially designed, oxygen-free reactor: a bioelectrochemically assisted microbial reactor, which they dubbed BEAMR. The reactor comprises two compartments. The first houses a negatively charged anode, composed of granulated graphite, which Logan sprayed with ammonia gas to help bacteria stick better. The second compartment contains a positively charged cathode of carbon, with a platinum catalyst. An ion-exchange membrane sits between the compartments. Logan used a small wire to connect both electrodes to a small external power source.

The researchers then fed the microbial reactor a varied diet of acetic acid and cellulose. They found that as bacteria fed, the reactor released protons and electrons. The electrons were immediately taken up by the anode, while the protons crossed the membrane to the cathode. The energy from the electrons (which amounted to 0.3 volts), coupled with a short jolt of external voltage (0.2 volts), passed into the cathode compartment, joining with the protons to produce hydrogen gas, which researchers captured and measured in a tube.

Penn State researchers have developed a microbial electrolysis cell, which they call BEAMR, to produce hydrogen. The process uses bacteria to break down organic material, such as acetic acid and cellulose. A small external burst of voltage aids in boosting hydrogen production.
Credit: Zina Deretsky, National Science Foundation

[1] 2 Next »

Comments

  • how does it compare?
    killian on 11/26/2007 at 7:49 PM
    Posts:
    54
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    It would be helpful to know how the process compares to anaerobic digestion by microbes to produce CH4.  CH4 is pretty similar to H2 as a fuel.  Which process has a higher energy yield?
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • why compare ??
    hano on 05/31/2008 at 6:50 PM
    Posts:
    3
    This isn't about whats better, it is about whats there now and the availability on the cheapest scale and what is the cheapest and easiest option for the public to utilize without changing too much. It is about what fits easiest, cheapest, and smartest into our lives now not in 50 years time when we got other options. I mean how available is CH4 how can we get it in large scale and cheaply?
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review July/August 2008
The Business of Social Networks
The future of the Web is social. But can social-networking sites ever make money?
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology