The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Hot design: A new plan for a fuel processor (top) that could be used in fuel cells calls for arranging a series of reactors in concentric tubes. At the center is a combustor, surrounded by chambers for heating methanol and water, stripping hydrogen from methanol, and removing carbon monoxide. The bottom image shows one option for integrating the fuel processor with a hydrogen fuel cell.
Ronald Besser, Stevens Institute of Technology
A novel design could allow laptops to run 5 to 10 times longer.
A new scheme for creating a compact device that efficiently converts methanol into hydrogen could make it practical to incorporate fuel cells into laptop computers and other portable electronics. Such a device could allow a laptop to run for 50 hours and be recharged instantly by swapping in a small fuel pack.
Fuel cells powered by methanol or another liquid fuel have long been held up as a solution to the ever-growing energy demands of portable electronics. But fuel cells that convert methanol directly into electricity are bulky. Fuel cells that run on hydrogen gas are much more compact, but the hydrogen, unlike liquid fuel, takes up too much space.
An ideal compromise would be a system that uses a hydrogen fuel cell but stores the hydrogen in liquid form as methanol until just before it's needed. The hydrogen would be freed in a series of steps in a fuel processor that include heating the fuel to vaporize it, heating water for steam reforming, and further reactions for removing carbon monoxide. But the challenge has been to make them both small and efficient.
At last week's American Chemical Society (ACS) meeting in Boston, Ronald Besser, a professor of chemical engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology, in Hoboken, NJ, described a new system that could solve the problem.
Unlike in previous designs, in which the different processing steps are built into successive flat layers, Besser proposes a cylindrical design in which the layers form concentric tubes. In such a design, heat spreads in all directions from a combustor at the center, facilitating the necessary reactions. To keep each layer at the optimal temperature, he would incorporate aerogels, a relatively new type of insulation. To decrease costs, he's proposing to use advanced plastics for several of the layers.
The fuel processor for generating the 20 watts of power needed for a laptop or a large radio would be 4.8 centimeters in diameter and 10 centimeters long. Adding the fuel cell and fuel storage could mean another 20 centimeters of length, Besser estimates, but the processor would still be small enough to fit in a laptop. Considering the whole package, the system would store about 1,000 watt hours per kilogram; the very best batteries reach only 300 watt hours per kilogram, and laptop batteries can be about half of this. Besser says that such a system could potentially provide 5 to 10 times the amount of energy as a battery.
Jamie Holladay, a session chair at the ACS conference, is optimistic that the system can work. However, he says that his own research suggests that incorporating a plastic layer may not be possible, since it could deteriorate over time. Instead, it might be possible to use a metal or ceramic outer layer.
Let's stop comparing apples to oranges when it comes to the ability of fuel cells to supply the sustained demands of radically different energy requirements.
Fuelcell discussions invariably wander into applications with radically different energy requirements. The reason is that everytime someone suggests any particular application for FCs, it gets shot down as a stupid approach compared to what's already available. That's the FC problem in a nutshell. There's basically no application for which it is the best solution.
.
SVE said "There's basically no application for which it is the best solution."
that's true, since the fuel cells will be no more used also in the field where they was the absolute winner for 40+ years: "spaceships"
infact, the new NASA Orion will use solar arrays and rechargeable batteries
.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
Gaetano Marano
246 Comments
It could be applied (also) to swappable electric cars' batteries >>>
.
this new idea could be applied (also) to swappable electric cars' batteries:
http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/033cellphoneCAR.html
thanks to its 6x power vs. LiIon cars batteries, the new cars could have (both) lighter batteries AND a longer autonomy (maybe, up to 300 miles)
and the "swappable battries" solve the main problem of all electric cars: the (now) very long (4+ hours) recharge time
.
Reply
SVE
51 Comments
Re: It could be applied (also) to swappable electric cars' batteries >>>
The issue with using this in cars is you're just swapping one liquid-fueled technology (gasoline) for another (methanol). You still can't use the home-delivered power grid for recharging, one of the main selling points for electric cars. Electric energy is cheap. With this, you're still dependent on going to some energy supply depot (gas station or battery swap station) that has to be widely available.
Reply
Gaetano Marano
246 Comments
you're right on this point, but...
.
you're right on this point and about the home recharge, but, if these new cells will be "sealed" the only way to "refuel" a car in long trips is to "swap" them "somewhere" (gas stations, Wal-Mart, etc.) while, if that cells can be refueled with methane, it's a NON SENSE to use a (very expensive) fuel cell and a (low performance) electric motor, instead of (simply) modify a gasoline car to work with methane!
however, I agree with you that rechargeable batteries are (and will always be) better, simpler, SAFER (since they have no explosive LH2 or methane) and several/dozens times cheaper than ANY kind of fuel cell
and, about "safety"... recently many notebooks has gone on fire due to defective Li-Ion batteries... well, how much "safe" a notebook with a methane+hydrogen fuel cell will be? ...could that kind of notebooks fly with their owners/passengers on common airlines and trains? ...etc.
.
Reply
Guest (zed2)
Re: you're right on this point, but...
1. It's not using the gas, methane (CH4), it's using the liquid, methanol (CH3OH).
2. You have it backwards. Electric motors are by no means inefficient. They can be up to 90% efficient. Compare this with 20% for an internal combustion engine running on any kind of fuel.
Reply