Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Silicon Nanocrystals for Superefficient Solar Cells

Research shows that silicon can wring two electrons from each photon of incoming light.

By Kevin Bullis

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

A typical solar cell generates only one electron per photon of incoming sunlight. Some exotic materials are thought to produce multiple electrons per photon, but for the first time, the same effect has been seen in silicon. Researchers at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), in Golden, CO, showed that silicon nanocrystals can produce two or three electrons per photon of high-energy sunlight. The effect, they say, could lead to a new type of solar cell that is both cheap and more than twice as efficient as today's typical photovoltaics.

Souped-up silicon: A micrograph of a seven-nanometer chunk of crystalline silicon, called a nanocrystal or quantum dot. Such structures could dramatically increase the efficiency of solar cells.
Credit: Arthur Nozik, National Renewable Energy Laboratory

As in earlier work with other materials, the extra electrons come from photons of blue and ultraviolet light, which have much more energy than those from the rest of the solar spectrum, especially red and infrared light. In most solar cells, the extra energy in blue and ultraviolet light is wasted as heat. But the small size of nanoscale crystals, also called quantum dots, leads to novel quantum-mechanical effects that convert this energy into electrons instead.

By generating multiple electrons from high-energy photons, solar cells made of silicon nanocrystals could theoretically convert more than 40 percent of the energy in light into electrical power, says Arthur Nozik, a senior research fellow at NREL. In contrast, today's flat rooftop solar panels are at best just over 20 percent efficient and are theoretically limited to about 30 percent efficiency. Concentrating sunlight with mirrors or lenses could raise that figure to about 40 percent, but the same approach could boost the efficiency of a silicon-nanocrystal solar cell to well over 60 percent, Nozik says.

Story continues below


What's more, solar cells made of silicon nanocrystals could prove to be cheap, giving them a significant advantage over other approaches to high-efficiency solar cells. For example, advanced "multijunction" cells have shown efficiencies of more than 40 percent. But these require complicated manufacturing processes that combine expensive semiconductors optimized for different parts of the solar spectrum. Silicon nanocrystals, in contrast, are relatively easy to make, even compared with the material in conventional solar cells, the best of which are made of very large, single crystals of silicon.

Silicon nanocrystals also have marked advantages over the other nanocrystal materials that have shown the multielectron effect. Some of these materials contain toxic elements such as lead or cadmium, and others rely on elements such as indium that are in limited supply. But silicon is both safe and abundant. It's also well studied, says Christiana Honsberg, professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Delaware, so engineers know how to work with it to make solar cells. Indeed, for many of the same reasons, silicon is by far the most common material in solar cells today, and it's attractive as the basis for broader deployment of photovoltaics in the future.

Comments

  • Synergy
    Wouldn't this be great to combine with other novel silicon technologies, such as Sliver Cells? Or silicon (amorphous) thinfilm maybe?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Siphon
    08/21/2007
    Posts:152
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Synergy
      I think that, frankly, you failed to understand the article. This tech uses silicon NANOcrystals. Thin films are only valuable because they use less of the  expensive pure silicon crystals grown to large sizes and thicknesses under exacting conditions.

      Nanocrystals are even smaller than thin film, which amounts to slicing the expensive crystals very thin so as to use less of an expensive ingredient and thus keep cost of manufacture lower than otherwise.

      Nanocrystals are in fact so much smaller as to make comparisons a joke, really. Large, pure crystals are not the raw material for nanocrystals. And the nanocrystals cannot be amorphous... because they are crystals.

      Now on the upside, this tech not only gains from the advantages of efficiency inherent in producing different numbers of electrons based on the amount of energy in the striking photon, but since it doesn't start out as a pure crystal -thick disk or thin film- a manufacturer does not incur the expense of paying for the expensive pure-silicon-crystal-growth processes.

      So, the "synergy" with these other techs is effectively already in this one: high efficiency from nano, low costs from avoiding using large amounts of large, pure crystals. And yet it is not synergy at all, nor is it something that we must research to apply. Nanocrystals are not merely thin, they are ridiculously small. "Nano" by definition generally refers to things that are no more than a tenth of a millionth of a meter (100 nanometers or 100nm) in at least 2 spacial dimensions. (Although some "nano" work is in the field of nanofilms that meet this requirement in only 1 dimension, thickness, and are designed to be spread over surfaces for much larger distances than 100nm, often even macroscopic distances.) For these crystals they meet the 100nm criterion in all 3 spacial dimensions. As well, it is impossible for a nanocrystal to be amorphous, in the sense of non-crystalline. If it's a nanocrystal, it's a crystal...just a small one.

      Hope that helps.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      cripdyke
      08/26/2007
      Posts:19
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: Re: Synergy
        Yes it does, thank you. Amorphous? What was I thinking, duh. Unless of course the nanocrystals were irradiated for long periods of time (but why would one do that?)

        The extreme size of the crystals actually sounds very problematic for mass production. How do you deposit these things onto anything adequately and homogeneously? And if that could be done, how do the crystals degrade over time in real world conditions?
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Siphon
        08/27/2007
        Posts:152
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
        • Re: Re: Synergy
          I aggree with Siphon on this last point (his/her second paragraph) and hope to see a reply soon (from concept to lab to technology and from here to commercially available products there is also a long way, sometimes unable to be completed). And this is not a minor affair, nor a problem of correct understanding of the article, but a practical point of view.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          atsilver
          09/20/2007
          Posts:1
      • Re: Synergy
        I have a factory which make wind turbines, currently we make 5KW VAWT for some big company such as Chinamobile etc, and they want we supply them solar panel too, there is a Chinese guy show me some document and claim he has the exclusive power for produce this product in China and he ask us invest huge money, after meet with him I find he know nothing about technology and business, so, I'd like if you can tell me who has this technology or patents, if there is some possible I can contact with him(them) and discuss about if we can cooperate for start a company in China for make this product, we can invest huge money for this project.
        regards
        roc
        rocnewhope01 at yahoo dot com
        Rate this comment: 12345

        rocnewhope
        10/17/2009
        Posts:1
  • Hybrid with polymer solar cells
    I would like to know if we could use silicon nanocrystals as dopants in P3HT:PCBM Bulk heterojunction solar cells and whether the efficiency thus achieved would be significant?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    amol91@gmail...
    08/19/2009
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.