Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Monday, August 13, 2007

Novel Batteries Get a Boost

GM plans to develop batteries with A123 Systems for its new electric vehicle.

By Kevin Bullis

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Charging ahead: GM's Volt concept car makes a turn in front of the lab where prototype batteries are being tested that could provide 40 miles of gas-free range. Below, illustrations of the car showing the center-line location for the battery pack.
Credit: GM

General Motors has announced it will work directly with A123 Systems, a start-up based in Watertown, MA, to develop batteries that are fine-tuned for the Chevrolet Volt, an electric vehicle scheduled for production in 2010 or 2011. The new agreement between the companies is designed to speed the vehicle to market.

The co-development deal is the latest in a series of announcements by the automaker indicating it is moving forward with plans for the Volt, an extremely fuel efficient hybrid. The Volt, first announced in January, will use batteries that can be recharged from a standard electrical outlet and is expected to get 40 miles on a single charge, eliminating trips to the gas station for average daily driving. While GM has not ruled out using batteries from another supplier, the agreement is a vote of confidence that A123's technology can meet the requirements for the vehicle, says Denise Gray, GM's director of hybrid energy storage devices.

A123 uses a new lithium-ion chemistry that allows its batteries to be much lighter and more compact than the nickel metal hydride batteries in existing hybrids today, and safer than the conventional lithium ion batteries found in consumer electronics. In June GM announced that it is working with the South Korean company LG Chem, and its subsidiary Compact Power, based in Troy, MI, to make both battery packs and the individual cells inside them. They also signed an agreement with an LG Chem competitor, the Frankfurt, Germany-based Continental Automotive Systems, to develop battery packs. Continental had planned to use A123 as a subcontractor to supply the batteries for these packs. The new agreement puts A123 in direct contact with GM on the Volt project.

At the end of 2005, A123 announced its first product, a cylindrical battery for power tools. For the Volt, A123 is shifting to a much bigger and flat, rather than cylindrical, battery cell that takes up significantly less space. Hundreds of these would be combined in a large pack, with control electronics and a cooling system, to power the Volt.

A123 employees have begun testing the new cell. In one test, a prototype cell, a silvery slab about the size of three decks of cards placed side by side, was crushed from the side to demonstrate its abuse tolerance. Unlike conventional lithium-ion batteries, which use a cobalt-oxide material that can overheat and cause laptops and cell phones to burst into flame, A123's batteries use a much more stable, and potentially cheaper, iron phosphate material. The crushed test battery showed no signs of overheating.

Earlier this year GM had picked A123 Systems as a potential supplier of lithium-ion batteries for a new version of its Saturn Vue hybrid that can be recharged by plugging it in, giving it a 10 mile all-electric range. It could be on the roads as early as 2009.

[1] 2 Next »

Comments

  • batteries swap
    Jochen on 08/13/2007 at 3:24 AM
    Posts:
    2
    Thinking about recharging: why not to swap the batteries ? Buying car without batteries and lease them charged at petrol stations. When close to empty swap for a charged one. Charging on night power surplus. The key point: technical arrangement that enables to remove/insert the battery pack (300 kgs or more) within an instant (F1 tyres exchange takes typically 8 seconds, what about a minute here ?)
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: batteries swap
      tsaidak on 08/13/2007 at 8:43 AM
      Posts:
      5
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      Just to be picky.... at 200 watts per mile (Prius needs 117) the 40 mile pack would weigh 103 lbs.
      Why would I want to swap out packs at a 40 mile range when I could recharge at home or at work in undere 5 hrs using a 110v line?  Also, swapping out the packs would be labor intensive compared to pumping gasoline, and actually drive up the cost per mile quite a bit.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: batteries swap
        jpdemers on 08/13/2007 at 11:57 AM
        Posts:
        31
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        How many fill-ups does your average station handle in a day?  Quadruple that, given the 40-mile range. I doubt service stations are capable of storing a thousand or so 100-lb battery packs, let alone handling the massive electrical load involved in recharging them all.  And trucking in 100,000 lbs of anything on a daily basis is out of the question. 
        An interesting option, if the battery pack indeed weighs only 100 lb, would be to double up the batteries.  Increasing the range, while adding less than the weight of an adult passenger, might be worth the added expense to many potential customers.
        Rate this comment: 12345
    • battery swap? >>> yes, just read my "cellphoneCAR" article >>>
      Gaetano Marano on 08/14/2007 at 11:39 AM
      Posts:
      55
      Avg Rating:
      2/5
      .

      I agree with the "battery swap" since already suggested in my July 23, 2007 "cellphoneCAR" article:

      http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/033cellphoneCAR.html

      and also posted comment in this Technology Review article:

      http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/19085/

      it's a great idea to solve the main electric cars' problem: the (4+ hours) too long
      recharge time

      .
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • FLAT BATTS...
    advill on 08/13/2007 at 5:37 AM
    Posts:
    11
    Avg Rating:
    1/5

    Are already in production with Valence, the SAPHION Li-Ph. line has standard lead-acid sizes.

    I don“t know how this A123 people is going to avoid the 200 patents Valence has in the process...
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: FLAT BATTS...
      asdar on 08/13/2007 at 9:49 AM
      Posts:
      62
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      There's a million ways around shape patents, mostly because they're not a breakthrough. I have a flashlight with a square battery that's 20 years old.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: FLAT BATTS...
        advill on 08/14/2007 at 9:12 AM
        Posts:
        11
        Avg Rating:
        1/5
        Well , i saw much hype of A123, but they have a product that is 5 years behind in relation with Valence this people have some basic research patents related to runaway process which seems no to easy to "go around"...will see.
        Rate this comment: 12345
  • GM Tying up A123?
    asdar on 08/13/2007 at 9:54 AM
    Posts:
    62
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    This paragraph made me sigh with relief, then grimace wondering if it meant something worse.

    Quote:
    "The agreement with GM does not mean that A123 will be locked out of doing work with other automakers. The specific cell the two companies develop together will be co-owned--so both companies will have to negotiate for how it might be used, Gray says. That could include putting the pack in cars by other companies, Gray says, since "it's in everyone's interest to achieve economies of scale to drive down battery prices." A123 still retains control over its novel battery chemistry, however. Indeed A123 has had discussions with other automakers and its batteries are set to be used in hybrid buses starting in 2008."
    End Quote:

    First off it says that A123 is free to deal with who they want, but then comes the line that makes me nervous.

    "The specific cell the two companies develop together will be co-owned--so both companies will have to negotiate for how it might be used, Gray says."

    Negotiation rights sounds an awful lot like control to me.

    I don't mind the idea of GM owning the tech, if they use it. I'm getting NiMh flashbacks from that line.

    I hope that the Volt, and A123 are on the road soon.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • battery ownership
    cripdyke on 08/13/2007 at 4:54 PM
    Posts:
    14
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    yes, chev volt battery will be co-owned, but a123 can always create a battery w/ different voltage and storage capacity, or even different storage cap and shape but the same voltage. A123 owns the battery tech, but chev would co-own that particular battery. Just because RCA co-owns the energizer C Cell doesn't mean that energizer can no longer sell batteries w/o RCA's permission.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: battery ownership
      EHL68 on 08/20/2007 at 2:59 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Fortunately, the article also mentions the many elements being customized for the Volt. 
      Quote--
      "...electrode chemistry, thickness, the type of electrolyte, and other aspects of the battery cell design..."
      --End Quote

      In truth though, it will likely come down to which side can produce documents on key  developments toward the final product, and which side has the better patent lawyers!

      Good luck, A123!  And to GM--I'm truly looking forward to a Volt as my next car, should it arrive at the 2010 or -11 model year!
      Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology