Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

A More Efficient Engine

A new type of engine could be relatively inexpensive.

By Kevin Bullis

Friday, August 03, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

A new version of the internal combustion engine, which could significantly cut gas consumption, might be surprisingly practical and easy to deploy, according to recent findings by researchers at MIT. Tests on a prototype based on the technology, which allows engines to switch between conventional technology and the new gas-saving type of combustion, show that it does not require a special fuel, and engines using the technology can be cheaply made out of conventional auto parts.

Clean burning: A new sparkless gas engine could significantly reduce fuel consumption. In a conventional engine (top), a mixture of fuel and air is ignited by a spark plug. In a diesel (middle), the fuel ignites when it's injected into hot, compressed air. An alternative to both is called homogeneous charge compression ignition (bottom). Here, a mixture of fuel and air is compressed until it combusts. Because the fuel and air are premixed, they burn more evenly than they do in a diesel engine, producing much less soot and nitrogen oxide.
Credit: MIT Laboratory for Energy and the Environment

The gas-saving technology, called homogeneous charge compression ignition, or HCCI, uses a form of combustion that is much more efficient than conventional spark ignition. Under some conditions, it can reduce fuel consumption by 25 percent, says William Green, a professor of chemical engineering at MIT who was coauthor of the new study. That's very similar to the efficiency of a diesel engine, which also achieves combustion by compression rather than a spark. But unlike diesel engines, HCCI results in a more uniform combustion and is thus much cleaner. A system that combines HCCI with conventional combustion could improve fuel economy by a few miles per gallon on average, Green says.

Several research groups are working on the new type of combustion. Volvo, for example, has built a hybrid system that can switch between conventional spark ignition and HCCI. Some experts, however, had expected that the new type of engine would require special fuel.

The MIT research shows that an HCCI engine can operate with any of the varieties of gasoline sold in North America, making a special fuel unnecessary. The researchers tested a range of different gasolines made at different refineries. They found that the HCCI engine "was less sensitive to the fuel than people had feared," says Green.

While the HCCI has several performance limitations, these can be addressed using a hybrid approach, in which an engine could switch between HCCI and conventional spark ignition. Using already mass-produced parts could make it relatively inexpensive to build such a hybrid, Green says.

Story continues below

In conventional gasoline engines, a spark ignites a mixture of fuel and air in a combustion chamber, creating an explosion that drives a piston. While this happens very efficiently when the engine is working hard, it's less efficient at lower loads, such as during cruising, when less gasoline is being pumped into the combustion chamber. At these times, to keep the ratio of fuel to oxygen optimized, a partial vacuum is created in the chamber. It takes extra energy to make this vacuum, which decreases the engine's efficiency.

The HCCI technology avoids the use of an energy-wasting vacuum. Instead, hot gases from a previous combustion cycle remain in the chamber; the engine uses a combination of heat from these hot gases and heat generated by compressing the mixture to raise temperatures high enough that the mixture explodes.

Comments

  • WHAT ABOUT THIS IN...


    A wankel engine?, as other reseach using a dual injection system (gasolina and etanol), the principle of engine efficiency is based in drastic increase of compresion ratio to 20:1 instead of actual 8:1.

    A rotatory engine can handle this sistem more efficiently than a reciprocal and reduce engine size keeping HP.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    advill
    08/03/2007
    Posts:15
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
  • Electric Motors Still 3x Better
    Typical electric vehicle motors still operate above the 90% efficiency mark, so I think that they will win in the end. 

    For a good comparison between an electric drive train and other types of drive trains for a given amount of energy input, take a look at this slideshow (click on "view presentation" button to bring up slides:

    http://www.teslamotors.com/blog2/?p=25


    Rate this comment: 12345

    dtmille2
    08/03/2007
    Posts:5
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    • Re: Electric Motors Still 3x Better
      First let me state that I'm not a automotive engineer, just someone who finds the topic interesting.

      Even though electrical is more efficient, you still have to generate that power.  Until someone develops a battery pack that delivers 400 miles per charge and the cost is comparative to gas, it'll never find more than a toe hold in the market. 

      What I don't understand is why a smaller battery pack isn't put into a car (able to hold, say a charge to carry the car 20 miles) and then a ultra efficient engine is used to charge the battery.  If many of the energy efficient concepts were used (say, HCCI and  BMW's new 6 stroke concept that is due out in the next couple of years), I don't see why getting 60mpg OR MORE isn't possible out of a midsize car.  The battery pack would be nothing but a buffer between the engine and the drivetrain, allowing the engine to operate within a narrow band for best efficiency.  As best I know, no one's doing this so I suspect that I'm over simplifying the issue.  So, what is it that I'm missing?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      RichardL
      08/03/2007
      Posts:3
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      • Re: Electric Motors Still 3x Better
        The technology you refer to is what Toyota is pursuing with the "pluggable" hybrid.  The battery pack has been substantially increased allowing the car to run about 10 miles before the gasoline engine kicks in.  The plans are to increase the range substantially. 
        At night the car can be plugged into the home's house current to use the household electricity to drive the first 10 miles.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        kearns
        08/03/2007
        Posts:29
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
      • Re: Electric Motors Still 3x Better
        I would agree that electric cars need to be cheaper with comparable performance in terms of speed and acceleration, but I think the range is more of an perceived issue than a real one.

        I know not everyone is like this, but I probably drive more than 200 miles in a single day 5 or 6 times a year, if that.  I would be glad to have an electric car to drive during my normal commute + errands, etc., and then use our other car, or even rent another car, for longer trips.  With no oil changes, no fill-ups (plug in at night though), no problems with mufflers, catalytic converters, or all of the other heat- and vibration-related wear on the vehicle, electric vehicles may be very easy to own and operate, and very desireable--even without a full tank of gas range. 

        I guess time will tell . . .
        Rate this comment: 12345

        dtmille2
        08/03/2007
        Posts:5
        Avg Rating:
        5/5
      • Re: Electric Motors Still 3x Better
        Check out http://www.chevrolet.com/electriccar/

        Due out by 2010 I think.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        drm237
        08/03/2007
        Posts:1
      • Re: Electric Motors Still 3x Better
        If you are going for a shorter charge, why not just plug in a lot of high capacity capacitors?  They wont wear out as quickly and are probably safer than using chemical batteries.  I also suppose you could get higher discharge rate than what a given battery can provide.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        maverick
        08/04/2007
        Posts:4
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
        • Re: Electric Motors Still 3x Better
          Ultracapacitors will truly change the game if they can be developed to deliver enough energy and power.  For now I know that ultracap's are being used in some smaller, shorter-range EV's.  TechReview did a story earlier this year on a company called EEStor, which is in this industry and has shown some promise in developing the technology.

          Ultracaps could potentially endure millions of discharge cycles, and be recharged in seconds to minutes--more quickly and easily than filling up your tank.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EEstor
          Rate this comment: 12345

          dtmille2
          08/04/2007
          Posts:5
          Avg Rating:
          5/5
          • Re: Electric Motors Still 3x Better
            Hey thanks for the link, I have always wondered what has been holding capacitors back, I guess the market has been focusing too much in other areas and just needed more of an impetus to go back to an old technology.
            Rate this comment: 12345

            maverick
            08/04/2007
            Posts:4
            Avg Rating:
            3/5
      • Re: Electric Motors Still 3x Better
        Most people drive less than 40 mile/day.  E.g. I have a 30 mile round trip commute.  A commuting car that gets 40 miles on a charge would do the trick for me.  If you need a long range, you can use another vehical.  If everyone with less than a 40 mile commute used electic, there would be a large savings.  Central electric power generation is much more efficent that auto engines.  Besides there are alternate ways to get that power.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        CarlHitchon
        10/16/2007
        Posts:14
        Avg Rating:
        5/5
    • Re: Electric Motors Still 3x Better
      Unfortunately, there are 70% losses in generating electricity so electric motors are nice, but electric powered vehicles total energy consumption ends up being lower efficiency than gasoline / internal combusions engines.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      theyodes
      08/03/2007
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      • Re: Electric Motors Still 3x Better
        70% losses?, where did you get this piece of misinformation
        Rate this comment: 12345

        enoch
        08/03/2007
        Posts:4
        Avg Rating:
        5/5
        • Re: Electric Motors Still 3x Better
          Older power plants have a 30% rate of converting the energy in the fuel to electricity (due to losses in the process). The newer plants are approching 40%.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          rdg8650
          08/06/2007
          Posts:1
      • Re: Electric Motors Still 3x Better
        Yeah, I don't understand where your losses come in.  Any clarification?
        Rate this comment: 12345

        dtmille2
        08/03/2007
        Posts:5
        Avg Rating:
        5/5
      • Re: Electric Motors Still 3x Better
        Don't know where that 70% comes from, but remember that you also have to transport gasoline from refinery to gas tank.  Not to mention refining the gasoline out of the crude oil.  Not to mention shipping the crude from well to refinery.  Not to mention the considerable costs of finding, drilling, running, and protecting the oil wells, most of which seem to be located in either inhospitable or politically unstable areas.

        BUT!!!  For whatever reason, electric vehicles are currently very expensive.  The prices are downright shocking, so ordinary consumers are resistant to buying them. (Puns intended, but point is still valid.)

        People can make efficiency comparisons 'til they're blue in the face, but in the end the only thing that matters is cost.  A new Toyota Prius (hybrid) costs about $20K, while a new Honda Civic (nonhybrid) costs about $15K.  Driving them around the city, people are reporting MPGs of 40 and 30.  If you drive 10K mile/year (which is a lot, considering we're talking about mostly urban driving), then the Prius will use 250 gallons of gas, while the Civic will use 333.  If gas averages $5/gallon over the next decade, that's a cost difference each year of $415.  So it will take 12 years to make up the $5K initial cost difference of the vehicles.  But if you take into account that the Civic buyer could put his $5K into long-term investments, plus pays less on car insurance, then the Prius owner NEVER catches up.

        I invite you to make these kinds of TCO comparisons for all-electric vs. similarly-performing all-gas cars.  I think you will be disheartened.

        My advice to everybody is: Move close to work, if possible.  Otherwise, car-pool.  Also try to work four 10-hour days, if that's allowed.  (Saves 20% on commuting costs, pollution, greenhouse gases, etc.)
        Rate this comment: 12345

        dmm
        08/03/2007
        Posts:191
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
        • Re: Electric Motors Still 3x Better
          I love the holistic economic train of thought.  People do not take into account the full spectrum of finance when determining what is "economical". 

          As former member of the military I have been in the middle east and it was not fun.  So I applaud people buying expensive hybrids for environmental purposes. But what about 10 years from now?  What is going to happen to the millions of pounds of batteries?  With battery and ultracap technology evolving so quickly there is a chance that these batteries will not be recycled/refurbished. 

          In addition to living close to work, carpooling and telecommuting people should try biking as often as possible/practical.  It would do more for America than just decrease our dependency on oil.  Biking more often would help alleviate our burgeoning health crisis as well. 
          Rate this comment: 12345

          gcrdyes
          08/04/2007
          Posts:1
    • Re: Coasting and Electric Motors Still 3x Better
      We returned over the weekend from a long drive through the mountains of New Mexico and Colorado. I applied coasting to reduce consumption in our REV4 4-Wheel Drive 2007 Toyota.  The REVA does 26 mile freeway and 18 city.  I boosted the efficiency of the ride to 35 mpg through mountains and on the freeway to 33 mpg.  Electric wins however. There is not shortage of gasoline and price per gallon is too low to stimulate movement to electrics or coasting.  I coast alone but now have a coasting habit. 
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Silacon
      08/03/2007
      Posts:46
      Avg Rating:
      2/5
    • Re: Electric Motors Still 3x Better
      Note, in cold weather it is very efficient to use the "waste" heat from an internal combustion engine to heat the car. The term for this concept is co-generation.  In addition an electric car can be no more efficient than the power generation facility that produces the electricity used by the car and to claim that the total efficiency is three times that of an internal combustion engine is a gross exaggeration. Those that advocate plug-able hybrids with an efficient internal combustion engine partnered with an advanced battery, such as the one produced by Altairoano, are on the right track for the most efficient and practical vehicle.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      sculptor
      08/09/2007
      Posts:8
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • GM volt integration
    Why not integrate this into the GM volt as it uses an electric motor to drive the vehicle but utilizes a small generator to charge the batteries when they are low. if you integrate this technology into the generator you wouldnt have to worry about load change as it would be a near constant consisntent load?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    urian1975
    08/03/2007
    Posts:16
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
  • Arthur Hanson
    Mercedes has already built and tested an engine that does this
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Arthur Hanso...
    08/06/2007
    Posts:1
  • Improving Efficiency
    Why go to the complicated and costly HCCI engine to improve engine efficiency?
    Cutting a few grooves, shaving of the head to improve CR as per US Patent of Mr Somender Singh will increase mileage by 20% plus, reduce exhaust pollution and keep the engine oil cleaner for a longer period and this has been achieved in hundreds of cars. Details are available in his
    website www.somender-singh.com.(email: garudarad1@rediffmail.com. The cost of modification is approx.US$350 in India. please find below the engine exhaust analysis of a modified 1000cc car taken from the web:

    Quote
    Kaizer Sozay
    View Public Profile
    Send a private message to Kaizer Sozay
    Send email to Kaizer Sozay
    Find More Posts by Kaizer Sozay
    Add Kaizer Sozay to Your Buddy List

    2nd September 2006, 19:20    #82 (permalink) 
    Kaizer Sozay
    BHPian




    Join Date: Apr 2005
    Location: Bombay Blues!!!
    Posts: 307

    View My Photo Gallery

      The PUC Report!!!

    --------------------------------------------------

    A PUC Report in a way vaildates the change in performance of the engine.

    I got the PUC done today on a PUC machine called ULTRA-TEC the readings are as follows (Both the readings are from the same machine at the same petrol pump)
    Reading ----- Today----- 1 Year Ago
    CO: ----- 0.326% Vol -----1.459% Vol
    CO2:----- 12.19%vol ------11.49% Vol
    HC: ----- 135PPM Vol----- 234PPM Vol
    O2: ----- 0.00% Vol -----3.24% Vol
    Lamda: ----- 0.982 -----1.113
    AFR: ----- 14.43 -----16.36

    I do not know what these readouts like Lambda & AFR are but every reading shows a significant Drop
    The Permissible limit for CO is 3% The reading now is 1/10th of that All I can gather from this is that the Engine is Much More Enviormentally Friendly.
    This is only possible if the combustion process is Complete & there is no Un burnt fuel being thrown out from the exhaust,
    Also There is a lot of water being thrown out from the tail pipe.
    -------------------------------------------------
    Last edited by Kaizer Sozay : 2nd September 2006 at 19:25.
    Unquote

    When will the car manufacturers incorprate this modification in the cars produced by them? Such a modification during the car manufacturing stage will cost very little and benefit the car owners by lowering the running cost of their cars.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ksviswanatha...
    08/07/2007
    Posts:6
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Improving Efficiency
      Why one or the other?  Why not both?  For that matter, build a motor into the flywheel for a "soft hybrid".  See how it stacks up against a Sterling external-combustion engine.  We need to combine known technologies when they can synergize without sacrificing reliability. 

      My favorite near-term would be a plug in hybrid with a small high efficiency engine such as diesel or what is being proposed here, elec motor, plus thin film PV panels on the roof, ultra low drag and light weight design.  If my Prius can get 50 real world mpg, a vehicle like that should be capable of 70-90, perhaps? 

      Individuals who started with a Prius platform created a plug in hybrid and then an upgrade kit, showing Toyota it could be done and now Toyota has taken up the torch.  The same could be done to retrofit PVs onto the plug in version, or Singh the engine's head, or add a Sterling generator to the exhaust system.  I say, go for it!
      Rate this comment: 12345

      HaPPI
      08/09/2007
      Posts:3
    • Re: Improving Efficiency
      Here is what I remember from my combustion class: AFR is most likely Air Fuel Ratio (wtair/wtfuel). Lambda looks like equivalence ratio which is AFR/AFRstoichiometric. So, 16.36/1.113=14.699 and 14.43/.982=14.695 so it looks like you're using same fuel (14.7 to 1 is right for gasoline). However, because the previous reading is above stoichiometric (more air than absolutely necessary) and second is below stoichiometric (you can also tell this by 02 output) the combustion dynamics are different, probably higher temp etc.  Point being to compare like fruit you want to run same AFR for both cases.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Vtech
      02/16/2009
      Posts:1
  • motor vehicle technology
    Am a trained mechanic from Kenya Polytchenic university, i would like to know more from your organistion. Am soon opening an Auto Parts shop and am considering these organisation as my main supplier.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Jemo
    06/24/2008
    Posts:1
  • Adiabatic Engine?
    Could this be something along what Smokey Yunick may have developed in the early 80's?  Though i believe his design still used spark plugs it did use something he refered to as a homogenizer to premix a pre-heated air fuel mixture. It's just what i recall reading about 25 years ago.  The article also stated that his design was such that it wouldn't pre-detonate or knock even when attempting to get the vehicle moving in high gear.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    asdfjkl
    06/09/2009
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.