|
Friday, August 03, 2007 A More Efficient EngineA new type of engine could be relatively inexpensive. By Kevin Bullis
A new version of the internal combustion engine, which could significantly cut gas consumption, might be surprisingly practical and easy to deploy, according to recent findings by researchers at MIT. Tests on a prototype based on the technology, which allows engines to switch between conventional technology and the new gas-saving type of combustion, show that it does not require a special fuel, and engines using the technology can be cheaply made out of conventional auto parts. The gas-saving technology, called homogeneous charge compression ignition, or HCCI, uses a form of combustion that is much more efficient than conventional spark ignition. Under some conditions, it can reduce fuel consumption by 25 percent, says William Green, a professor of chemical engineering at MIT who was coauthor of the new study. That's very similar to the efficiency of a diesel engine, which also achieves combustion by compression rather than a spark. But unlike diesel engines, HCCI results in a more uniform combustion and is thus much cleaner. A system that combines HCCI with conventional combustion could improve fuel economy by a few miles per gallon on average, Green says. Several research groups are working on the new type of combustion. Volvo, for example, has built a hybrid system that can switch between conventional spark ignition and HCCI. Some experts, however, had expected that the new type of engine would require special fuel. The MIT research shows that an HCCI engine can operate with any of the varieties of gasoline sold in North America, making a special fuel unnecessary. The researchers tested a range of different gasolines made at different refineries. They found that the HCCI engine "was less sensitive to the fuel than people had feared," says Green. While the HCCI has several performance limitations, these can be addressed using a hybrid approach, in which an engine could switch between HCCI and conventional spark ignition. Using already mass-produced parts could make it relatively inexpensive to build such a hybrid, Green says. In conventional gasoline engines, a spark ignites a mixture of fuel and air in a combustion chamber, creating an explosion that drives a piston. While this happens very efficiently when the engine is working hard, it's less efficient at lower loads, such as during cruising, when less gasoline is being pumped into the combustion chamber. At these times, to keep the ratio of fuel to oxygen optimized, a partial vacuum is created in the chamber. It takes extra energy to make this vacuum, which decreases the engine's efficiency. The HCCI technology avoids the use of an energy-wasting vacuum. Instead, hot gases from a previous combustion cycle remain in the chamber; the engine uses a combination of heat from these hot gases and heat generated by compressing the mixture to raise temperatures high enough that the mixture explodes. |
The Incredible Shrinking Engine
03/01/2007



Comments
advill on 08/03/2007 at 4:37 AM
11
A wankel engine?, as other reseach using a dual injection system (gasolina and etanol), the principle of engine efficiency is based in drastic increase of compresion ratio to 20:1 instead of actual 8:1.
A rotatory engine can handle this sistem more efficiently than a reciprocal and reduce engine size keeping HP.
dtmille2 on 08/03/2007 at 8:21 AM
5
For a good comparison between an electric drive train and other types of drive trains for a given amount of energy input, take a look at this slideshow (click on "view presentation" button to bring up slides:
http://www.teslamotors.com/blog2/?p=25
RichardL on 08/03/2007 at 9:10 AM
3
Even though electrical is more efficient, you still have to generate that power. Until someone develops a battery pack that delivers 400 miles per charge and the cost is comparative to gas, it'll never find more than a toe hold in the market.
What I don't understand is why a smaller battery pack isn't put into a car (able to hold, say a charge to carry the car 20 miles) and then a ultra efficient engine is used to charge the battery. If many of the energy efficient concepts were used (say, HCCI and BMW's new 6 stroke concept that is due out in the next couple of years), I don't see why getting 60mpg OR MORE isn't possible out of a midsize car. The battery pack would be nothing but a buffer between the engine and the drivetrain, allowing the engine to operate within a narrow band for best efficiency. As best I know, no one's doing this so I suspect that I'm over simplifying the issue. So, what is it that I'm missing?
kearns on 08/03/2007 at 9:50 AM
24
At night the car can be plugged into the home's house current to use the household electricity to drive the first 10 miles.
dtmille2 on 08/03/2007 at 1:17 PM
5
I know not everyone is like this, but I probably drive more than 200 miles in a single day 5 or 6 times a year, if that. I would be glad to have an electric car to drive during my normal commute + errands, etc., and then use our other car, or even rent another car, for longer trips. With no oil changes, no fill-ups (plug in at night though), no problems with mufflers, catalytic converters, or all of the other heat- and vibration-related wear on the vehicle, electric vehicles may be very easy to own and operate, and very desireable--even without a full tank of gas range.
I guess time will tell . . .
drm237 on 08/03/2007 at 1:51 PM
1
Due out by 2010 I think.
maverick on 08/04/2007 at 1:15 AM
3
dtmille2 on 08/04/2007 at 11:04 AM
5
Ultracaps could potentially endure millions of discharge cycles, and be recharged in seconds to minutes--more quickly and easily than filling up your tank.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EEstor
maverick on 08/04/2007 at 8:47 PM
3
CarlHitchon on 10/16/2007 at 1:23 AM
14
theyodes on 08/03/2007 at 9:46 AM
1
enoch on 08/03/2007 at 12:44 PM
3
rdg8650 on 08/06/2007 at 8:23 AM
1
dtmille2 on 08/03/2007 at 1:10 PM
5
dmm on 08/03/2007 at 3:23 PM
136
BUT!!! For whatever reason, electric vehicles are currently very expensive. The prices are downright shocking, so ordinary consumers are resistant to buying them. (Puns intended, but point is still valid.)
People can make efficiency comparisons 'til they're blue in the face, but in the end the only thing that matters is cost. A new Toyota Prius (hybrid) costs about $20K, while a new Honda Civic (nonhybrid) costs about $15K. Driving them around the city, people are reporting MPGs of 40 and 30. If you drive 10K mile/year (which is a lot, considering we're talking about mostly urban driving), then the Prius will use 250 gallons of gas, while the Civic will use 333. If gas averages $5/gallon over the next decade, that's a cost difference each year of $415. So it will take 12 years to make up the $5K initial cost difference of the vehicles. But if you take into account that the Civic buyer could put his $5K into long-term investments, plus pays less on car insurance, then the Prius owner NEVER catches up.
I invite you to make these kinds of TCO comparisons for all-electric vs. similarly-performing all-gas cars. I think you will be disheartened.
My advice to everybody is: Move close to work, if possible. Otherwise, car-pool. Also try to work four 10-hour days, if that's allowed. (Saves 20% on commuting costs, pollution, greenhouse gases, etc.)
gcrdyes on 08/04/2007 at 4:00 PM
1
As former member of the military I have been in the middle east and it was not fun. So I applaud people buying expensive hybrids for environmental purposes. But what about 10 years from now? What is going to happen to the millions of pounds of batteries? With battery and ultracap technology evolving so quickly there is a chance that these batteries will not be recycled/refurbished.
In addition to living close to work, carpooling and telecommuting people should try biking as often as possible/practical. It would do more for America than just decrease our dependency on oil. Biking more often would help alleviate our burgeoning health crisis as well.
Silacon on 08/03/2007 at 6:36 PM
37
sculptor on 08/09/2007 at 2:21 AM
8
urian1975 on 08/03/2007 at 9:19 AM
16
Arthur Hanson on 08/06/2007 at 7:56 AM
1
ksviswanathan on 08/07/2007 at 7:38 AM
6
Cutting a few grooves, shaving of the head to improve CR as per US Patent of Mr Somender Singh will increase mileage by 20% plus, reduce exhaust pollution and keep the engine oil cleaner for a longer period and this has been achieved in hundreds of cars. Details are available in his
website www.somender-singh.com.(email: garudarad1@rediffmail.com. The cost of modification is approx.US$350 in India. please find below the engine exhaust analysis of a modified 1000cc car taken from the web:
Quote
Kaizer Sozay
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Kaizer Sozay
Send email to Kaizer Sozay
Find More Posts by Kaizer Sozay
Add Kaizer Sozay to Your Buddy List
2nd September 2006, 19:20 #82 (permalink)
Kaizer Sozay
BHPian
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Bombay Blues!!!
Posts: 307
View My Photo Gallery
The PUC Report!!!
--------------------------------------------------
A PUC Report in a way vaildates the change in performance of the engine.
I got the PUC done today on a PUC machine called ULTRA-TEC the readings are as follows (Both the readings are from the same machine at the same petrol pump)
Reading ----- Today----- 1 Year Ago
CO: ----- 0.326% Vol -----1.459% Vol
CO2:----- 12.19%vol ------11.49% Vol
HC: ----- 135PPM Vol----- 234PPM Vol
O2: ----- 0.00% Vol -----3.24% Vol
Lamda: ----- 0.982 -----1.113
AFR: ----- 14.43 -----16.36
I do not know what these readouts like Lambda & AFR are but every reading shows a significant Drop
The Permissible limit for CO is 3% The reading now is 1/10th of that All I can gather from this is that the Engine is Much More Enviormentally Friendly.
This is only possible if the combustion process is Complete & there is no Un burnt fuel being thrown out from the exhaust,
Also There is a lot of water being thrown out from the tail pipe.
-------------------------------------------------
Last edited by Kaizer Sozay : 2nd September 2006 at 19:25.
Unquote
When will the car manufacturers incorprate this modification in the cars produced by them? Such a modification during the car manufacturing stage will cost very little and benefit the car owners by lowering the running cost of their cars.
HaPPI on 08/09/2007 at 11:31 AM
3
My favorite near-term would be a plug in hybrid with a small high efficiency engine such as diesel or what is being proposed here, elec motor, plus thin film PV panels on the roof, ultra low drag and light weight design. If my Prius can get 50 real world mpg, a vehicle like that should be capable of 70-90, perhaps?
Individuals who started with a Prius platform created a plug in hybrid and then an upgrade kit, showing Toyota it could be done and now Toyota has taken up the torch. The same could be done to retrofit PVs onto the plug in version, or Singh the engine's head, or add a Sterling generator to the exhaust system. I say, go for it!
Jemo on 06/24/2008 at 5:06 AM
1