Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Tidal Turbines Help Light Up Manhattan

Turbines are being submerged in the East River to generate electricity from rapid tidal currents.

By Peter Fairley

Monday, April 23, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Working from barges and tugboats off New York City's Roosevelt Island, engineers are battling northeasters and this month's heavy spring tides to install the first major tidal-power project in the United States. The project involves a set of six submerged turbines that are designed to capture energy from the East River's tidal currents. The three-bladed turbines, which are five meters in diameter and resemble wind turbines, are made by Verdant Power of Arlington, VA.

Power ebb: Verdant Power is installing six of these underwater turbines in New York’s East River. Each can capture up to 35 kilowatts of power from the river’s tidal currents.
Credit: Verdant Power

Thanks to lessons learned by wind turbine designers, tidal power is already economically competitive, producing electricity at prices similar to wind power, according to feasibility studies by the Electric Power Research Institute, an industry R&D consortium. And it offers a big advantage over wind and other renewables: a precisely predictable source of energy. As a result, developers in the United States have laid claim to the best sites up and down the Atlantic and Pacific coasts. In the past four years the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in Washington, DC, has issued preliminary permits for tidal installations at 25 sites, and it is considering another 31 applications.

Current-harvesting turbines represent a sharp break from the first wave of tidal power, so-called "barrages" in which impoundments installed across estuaries or bays created hydroelectric reservoirs refilled twice daily by rising tides. The La Rance barrage in Normandy has produced up to 240 megawatts of power--as much as many natural-gas-fired power plants--since 1966. Halifax utility Nova Scotia Power has been generating up to 20 megawatts of power since 1984 at a tidal barrage in the Bay of Fundy, whose funnel-shaped inlet produces the world's largest tides--16 meters at its head.

But these constructions have fallen out of favor because of their outsize impact on ocean ecosystems. James Taylor, general manager of environmental planning and monitoring for Nova Scotia Power, notes that commercial-scale installations planned for the Bay of Fundy in the 1980s would have altered tides as far away as Boston. "It would be a pretty hard thing to get permitted today," says Taylor.

Hence the attraction of in-flow turbines such as Verdant's. "The whole point of doing kinetic hydro is to have a very small environmental footprint," says Dean Corren, Verdant's director of technology development, who designed the tidal turbines in the early 1980s while conducting energy research at New York University.

Story continues below


Corren's team installed its first two turbines in the East River in December. One has been delivering a maximum of 35 kilowatts of power to New York City, swiveling to generate power as the river swells with the high tides and empties with the low. The other turbine delivers performance data that Corren says will be crucial to refining the blades and gearbox, generator, and control system to optimize power generation.

This month Verdant added four more 35-kilowatt turbines. Corren says Verdant is now working on a next-generation design that will be cheaper to mass-produce, in anticipation of installing a farm of at least 100 turbines at the East River site.

Comments

  • Good news, bad news
    The good news is that this technology is far superior to unreliable wind power in being redictable and reliable. The bad news is that there just isn't very much tidal energy that can be tapped in the U.S. a point ignored by the cheerleading article. Elsewhere I learned that
    very few U.S. locations allow for significant tidal energy extraction, and the amounts extracted aren't that great. As I recall, New York has the best situation and yet will only yield around 10 megawatts of power. I'd guess that city needs something like 20,000 plus megawatts during peak demand. More than a drop in
    the bucket, but also more than 30 $2 million plus wind turbines can produce and more than 200 wind turbines can produce during peak demand periods.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    theBike45
    04/23/2007
    Posts:15
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Good news, bad news
      You are right, there is only limited energy to be had from tides in most places. Some, sure, will be able to harvest much more; and slow river currents can offer energy too. But 35Kw for New York City?! It is another case of dumping a lot of money and tech to make some people feel good. We could impoverish ourselves, in fact, the entire planet, with such projects to make the Planeteers happy, and still be out of energy. I'd rather the effort and resources go to places that can yield significant results.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      kitk
      04/23/2007
      Posts:66
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: Good news, bad news
        Each turbine is 35 kW. The article says 100 of them are planned. That's 3.5 megawatts. That's far shy of a 1,000 MW coal-burning power plant, but it's still significant for renewable, non-polluting power.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Tysto
        04/23/2007
        Posts:24
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
  • Conservation is the solution
    I am not convinced that global warming is primarily anthropogenic.  Plus, we have a high family income, and most people on this board would describe me as a radical right-wing religious conservative.  HOWEVER:  My family does not eat lots of meat.  I live only 3 miles from work.  Our house is 40+ years old, rather than a new McMansion.  We keep our house cool in winter and warm in summer.  We have one reasonably-sized TV, and mostly fluorescent lights.  We have no dog or cat.  We do not fertilize or water our lawn, and we mulch rather than bag the clippings.  We recycle as much as possible.  We rarely buy new clothing.  Our cars are used, are inexpensive models, and get washed once a year.

    Reduce, reuse, recycle.  Give a hoot, don't pollute.  Save the rainforest.  Don't let species go extinct.  Ranger Rick and friends were giving us good sensible advice LONG before the supposed global warming crisis.  My advice is: Forget about greenhouse gasses.  Simply consume less and spend less money.  By doing so, you will naturally reduce your environmental footprint.

    My policy recommendations (for the U.S.):
    1. Permanently raise taxes on energy while raising personal exemptions on income tax to remain revenue-neutral and not unduly burden the poor.  The free market will then act to reduce national energy use.
    2. Spend more money on urban infrastructure to encourage people and businesses to stay close together.  Save the countryside for farmers and wildlife.
    3. Encourage people to save rather than consume.  Do not tax interest income below a generous amount.  Do not take savings into account when doling out college financial aid, Medicaid, etc.  Why should wastrels who mess up the environment get MORE gov't help while eco-friendly savers get LESS?
    4. Commit to a steady long-term program of research on energy saving and clean(er) energy science and technology.  Attempting quick fixes and Manhattan projects will almost always backfire.  [Manhattan projects!  Get it?]
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dmm
    04/23/2007
    Posts:207
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Efficiency is a sexier word for conservation?


      Efficiency versus Conservation.

      Conservation has a connotation of going / doing / using less "stuff" - of saving / not spending.

      Efficiency has a connotation of going / doing the same, while using fewer / less resources.

      Both are usually about less resource consumption.

      A whole lot more people embrace being efficient with their usage of water, energy, carbon, ... ?

      Versus shunning conservation.

      Please consider using the word efficiency, rather than conservation.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      nekote
      04/24/2007
      Posts:139
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • Sashimi
    Since we are so concerned with the windmills filleting birds are we equally concerned with these turbines turning what fish are left in the Hudson into sashimi?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    sbkadar
    04/23/2007
    Posts:5
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: Tidal Power
      Check the Open Hydro link. Open Hydro acquired Florida Hydro a year or so ago. Florida Hydro (as well as Clean Current) has a brilliant design to simplify turbine/generator design and operation to avoid fish kill and Florida Hydro was investigating the massive Florida Current as a an energy source. The Florida Current could provide all the electricity needs for the Southeastern United States with power left over to produce hydrogen. This could happen 24 hours per day  every day of the year (with an extra kick the Florida Current provides in summer just in time for the A/C season). All happening deep underwater, out of sight and secure.

      Resources are not, they become.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      tn
      04/24/2007
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      1/5
  • Tidal lifting power
    tides in NY Harbor rise and fall 6' twice a day - 25'+/- total each day; they lift the biggest ships; why not also use that lifitng power? 
    It does not depend on wind or sun; no fish problem; never stops because it  is powered by the moon and sun; offer  $10MM prize for most efficient generator - maybe compressed air?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    architectrb
    04/25/2007
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Tidal lifting power
      You have it exactly right, It is quit simple, Lift a weight and let is fall at a governed rate lift many weights and let them fall as they raise they can generate power and as they fall they can do the same.. Schmuzl  Jim
      Rate this comment: 12345

      schmuzl
      09/26/2008
      Posts:1
  • Why limit yourself to the current?
    There are some companies working on what you’re talking about. It is just a buoy with a liner generator that is anchored to the bottom with a cable. It generates electricity when it rises and falls with the waves. These seem like the most practical way of collecting energy from the ocean because they are small simple, and relatively low tech. No Multi million dollar project just to get 35KW. They are getting closer to cost effective, in a few years they may look good.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    zig158
    04/26/2007
    Posts:64
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Why limit yourself to the current?
      There was an experamental stsyem like this I believe on the south coast of France a few years ago. The problem is that ocean waves are not predictable or stable. So the power output is variable just like in wind generation. I think what does need to be explored however is power generation using these same system but placed in rivers not just tidal areas.

      Since river currents are also relatively stable and fast moving, it seems to me that they could work there as well.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Rubingrinnol...
      04/30/2007
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • Tide powered Turbines
    Can a smaller version be made for US rivers?  My house on the Cape Fear river could be powered by one of these easily.  Of course the environmental Police groups would have a cow.  Renewable energy has to become the new way to power the country, and this looks like an outstanding way to generate power safely and with a very low up-keep cost.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    skiyryder
    05/01/2007
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • CETO - Real Wave Solution
    http://www.carnegiecorp.com.au/
    Please check out the great work that this company has been doing on harnessing the power from waves. Simplicity is sometimes the most beautiful element in viable solutions.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    joe.davila
    11/07/2009
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.