Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
« Back 1 [2]

Monday, February 05, 2007

Algae-Based Fuels Set to Bloom

Continued from page 1

By Kevin Bullis

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Biotech advances in the past decade could help. New genomic and proteomic technologies make it much easier to understand the mechanisms involved in algae-oil production. One of the challenges researchers have faced is that while some types of algae can produce large amounts of oil--as much as 60 percent of their weight--they only do this when they're starved for nutrients. But when they're starved for nutrients, they lose another of their attractive features: their ability to quickly grow and reproduce. Researchers hope to understand the molecular switches that cause increased oil production, with the added hope of triggering it without starving the algae. This could dramatically increase oil production and drive down prices.

A better understanding of biology may help researchers address another problem. The cheapest way to grow algae is in open ponds. But open ponds full of nutrients invite other species to take over, competing with the algae and cutting down production. LiveFuels, which is funding and coordinating research at its own lab and at those at both Sandia and the NREL, hopes to create algal ecosystems that resist such invaders by ensuring that all the nutrients are converted to forms the algae can easily use, says David Kingsbury, the chair of the company's scientific advisory board.

Recent tests of an algae-based system developed by GreenFuel, which, unlike LiveFuels, is developing closed bioreactors, showed that it could capture about 80 percent of the carbon dioxide emitted from a power plant during the day when sunlight is available. Although this carbon dioxide will later be released when the fuel is burned in vehicles, the carbon dioxide would have entered the atmosphere anyway. Reusing it in renewable liquid fuels makes it possible to prevent the release of carbon dioxide from fossil fuels, thereby decreasing total emissions.

The growing interest in regulating carbon-dioxide emissions could also be a boon to algal fuels. "If there is a carbon tax, or another way to basically make money by capturing carbon dioxide, that could definitely impact the economics," Jarvis says. But GreenFuel's John Lewnard, vice president of process development, says the company thinks it can reach competitive prices without carbon taxes.

But for now, lowering costs will mean overcoming many technical hurdles. "Clearly, [producing fuel from algae] can be done," says Lissa Morgenthaler Jones, LiveFuels's CEO. "The only question is whether we can do it cheaply. And the only way we're going to find that out is if we do it--if we actually go out, crank it through, spend some millions on it, and make it happen."

There is plenty of federal interest these days. In his State of the Union address, President Bush set an ambitious goal of replacing 20 percent of gasoline consumption in the United States by 2017, largely by producing 35 billion gallons of renewable fuels. Meeting those goals will be a challenge. Right now, biofuels come from food crops such as soybeans and corn; already the demand for corn to produce ethanol is driving up staple foods' prices and fueling protests in Mexico. One alternative to food sources is cellulosic materials such as wood chips, grass, and cornstalks, which are more abundant than corn grain. But these require special processing methods, and although some of these techniques have been demonstrated at small plants, they have yet to be proved commercially.

« Back 1 [2]

Comments

  • 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
    nekote on 02/05/2007 at 8:38 AM
    Posts:
    98
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    According to http://www.oakhavenpc.org/cultivating_algae.htm , certain micro algae (single cell algae) might produce anywhere from 10 times to 1000 times as much liquid fuel per year per acre as conventional agriculture.

    Gallons of Oil per Acre per Year

    Corn 18
    Soybeans 48
    Safflower 83
    Sunflower 102
    Rapeseed 127
    Oil Palm 635
    Micro Algae 5000-15000

    A 100 fold factor is an awfully powerful incentive to make it work.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
      VCRAGAIN on 02/05/2007 at 9:03 AM
      Posts:
      32
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      the basic message to get out is that we need  to make these fuels no matter what the price of oil is - we will only be putting off what we have to do in the end anyway  - and we are paying the enemy - that should be enuf incentive shouldnt it ??
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
        Michael543 on 02/05/2007 at 9:47 AM
        Posts:
        8
        Avg Rating:
        2/5
        The simplest approach to resolving the "dependence on foreign oil" problem is to apply a tariff on foreign oil.  Not CAFE standards or "carbon taxes" or anything else.  If we put imported oil at an economic disadvantage, and perhaps build in a minimum price + tariff at around $50/bbl, then the market would determine which alternatives win out.  To stack the deck in favor of renewables, a CO2 cap and trade scheme needs to be implemented with a hard cap and hard targets for dropping it over the next couple decades.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
          Hardheadjarhead on 02/05/2007 at 11:07 AM
          Posts:
          15
          Fifty percent of our oil comes from Canada.  Why put a tariff on that?  They're not hostile to us, logistics of oil transfer are simplified, and our economies are connected in a number of other ways.  Plus they have good beer.

          We have numerous solutions to the present dependency problem.  Biofuels, coal conversion, plug-hybrids, other renewables...

          It'd be zippy to get them all going.  The problems of climate change need also to be addressed, but short term weaning off of overseas oil (note Canada would be an exception here) would solve a lot of problems.
          Rate this comment: 12345
          • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
            roger_leejr on 02/06/2007 at 3:36 AM
            Posts:
            1
            Avg Rating:
            1/5

            By tariffing Canadian oil, we would be doing them a favor.
            Currently, Canada has no hope of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and our consumption is driving prices up in a nation that relies on petroleum and natural gas for heat, industry and transportation.  The only issue then is how to keep the other vultures off of North American oil and gas supply, I.e., China and India.  But a gradually increasing tax on imported oil may be our only path to national survival, as even as the oil is out there in the world, we are bleeding to death financially buying it
            RC
            Rate this comment: 12345
          • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
            Michael543 on 02/09/2007 at 10:16 AM
            Posts:
            8
            Avg Rating:
            2/5
            We could exclude the NAFTA nations from the tariff, but the stated goal of every President since Nixon has been to wean the country from foreign oil.  Yet every action that has been taken has had the net effect of an increasing use of imported oil.  The tariff is the one tool that could put imported oil at a price disadvantage while setting a floor below which the Saudis and OPEC won't be able to drive the price of oil sold in the US, which has generally had the effect of bankrupting the alternative fuels companies (or forced the government to provide direct subsidies).

            So would you support a tariff on non-NAFTA nations? 
            Rate this comment: 12345
          • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
            czorba on 11/27/2007 at 12:19 PM
            Posts:
            2
            A floor price for oil would prevent market price from undercutting profitability (economic viability) of alternative fuel investments.
            Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
          Shlep_rock on 02/05/2007 at 6:55 PM
          Posts:
          1
          Avg Rating:
          1/5
          In theory, an easier sell should be to stop SUBSIDIZING Oil.  I think most people could agree on that.  At least put them on a level playing field with all the other potential technologies currently available.  I've read estimates that range from $.30-1.50 a gallon increase if subsidies were removed.  Perhaps it could be done in stages as to not adversely effect the economy as much.  A gradual repeal would also take some of the uncertainty away from the financial/commodities markets.  There's a bill going through the Senate right now that proposes an Oil subsidy repeal.  I haven't read the details on it however.  I believe it's a full repeal of Oil subsidies.  Bush is saying he won't pass it though.  It's ironic that a Republican is against the Free Market approach on this. 
          Rate this comment: 12345
          • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
            Michael543 on 02/09/2007 at 10:26 AM
            Posts:
            8
            Avg Rating:
            2/5
            Please specify the subsidies you're talking about.  If you're talking about what I think you're talking about, then the approach of increasing fees on domestically produced oil taken from public lands will have the effect of making imported oil more attractive.  This is the sort of short-sighted policy I mentioned earlier.
            Rate this comment: 12345
          • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
            microsrfr on 04/03/2008 at 4:06 PM
            Posts:
            1
            Avg Rating:
            5/5
            The biggest subsidy to oil producers is the cost of securing our imported oil supply.  According to the late Milton Copulos of the National Defense Fund, a recognized expert in military cost, the tally for securing our imported oil, including the cost of the Iraq war, is rapidly approaching one trillion dollars a year.  This means that every time you fill up your tank for $60, you are adding anothe $60 to our taxes and/or national deficit.  This cost is rising rapidly -- witness President Bush's recent visit to Africa to secure bases for protection of African oil.
            Rate this comment: 12345
        • Wrong Tax
          nick47g on 04/26/2007 at 1:58 PM
          Posts:
          17
          Avg Rating:
          2/5
          Are We doing this to keep driving SUV's?
          Tax fuel wastage and extravagance.
          Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
          czorba on 11/27/2007 at 12:17 PM
          Posts:
          2
          Michael...

          Re: Floor price for petroleum.  See www.bottombarrelbucks.com.   Right on!
          Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
        Nick7 on 02/08/2007 at 8:11 AM
        Posts:
        1
        VC RAGAIN...Great response.

        We need to break our addiction now.  And the sad truth is that we have the technology today to break the addiction.  Sure Algae might be a solution, but I suggest using a collection of different methods to address our enduring and emerging energy needs.  Specifically, we need to:
        1. Provide significant incentives, in the way of tax relief or release, to companies that can produce alternatives. (Results equals Rewards)
        2. Increase research funding by 500% in the areas of energy collection & storage (batteries) and energy production (Algae/Ethanol/Clean Burning Coal/Hydrogen perhaps) using non-traditional methods. 
        3. Remove all energy subsidies and divert funding to wind and solar exploitation.
        4. 35 more nuclear power plants
        5. In transition from Middle-Eastern, Nigerian, Russian, and Venezuelan oil, facilitate oil exploration and exploitation domestically.  Yes, this means ANWAR.
        6. Make hybrid vehicles a 1/1 dollar tax write-off with minimum standard of 50/50 MPG.  Spend 25K on a hybrid and get a 25K tax write-off.
        7. Set an aggressive timetable….5 years to energy independence…ala Manhattan…..

        Disturbing is that we currently fund the very countries that actively pursue and pray for our demise.  A reduction or elimination on our reliance of foreign oil will crush the very regimes that are hostile to Americans and our way of life.  We don’t have to kill all of our enemies…we just have to drive them to their knees…financially.

        Nick
        Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
          Michael543 on 02/09/2007 at 10:37 AM
          Posts:
          8
          Avg Rating:
          2/5
          Agreed, there needs to be a comprehensive energy policy, the likes of which hasn't been possible in the current political climate.  We (the government) shouldn't be in the business of picking winners, but identifying which fuels and processes have adverse impacts on the environment, the economy and our geopolitical position and using the tax law and rulemaking to mitigate those impacts.
          Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
          shigley on 02/13/2007 at 5:18 PM
          Posts:
          2
          Right on Nick7. You've hit all the bases!
          Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
          BRUCE M. GRAUER on 04/24/2007 at 12:35 PM
          Posts:
          3
          Avg Rating:
          5/5
          BESIDES IMPROVING ENERGY STORAGE FOR WHAT I CALL"plug'n'play"hybrides(would turbine/generator systems that burn any fuel be a viable range extender?)we need to push r&d programs in room temperature super conductors.too much energy is lost in transmission lines.if we could get out as much as we put in it would dwarf any conservation efforts.
          Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
          equsnarnd on 05/11/2007 at 11:55 AM
          Posts:
          1
          Nick7
          I like your approach of rewarding rather than punishing.  Too many people on this list are knee jerk fascists who think passing a law, using force is the answer to every problem.  Most of their 'economic' solutions wouldn't work but they make great grist for politicians and bumper stickers.  Thanks to you and all of you who think the use of intelligence and technology should trump law and force.
          Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
          bluedog18820 on 04/27/2008 at 8:09 PM
          Posts:
          1
          good idea and wouldn'tthis country and the world be a safer and cheaper place to live
          Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
      SirLanse on 02/05/2007 at 9:07 AM
      Posts:
      33
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      Here in Tampa, we have algea problems.
      We have run off from phosphate mines, that
      causes alea blooms in local ponds etc.
      We also have lots of sun.  Putting them together
      should be a no-brainer. 
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
        Michael543 on 02/05/2007 at 9:58 AM
        Posts:
        8
        Avg Rating:
        2/5
        Using anaerobic digesters to convert manure into more useable fertilizer with the by-product of recovering methane could probably reduce the amount of nutrients in run-off.  Constructing engineered wetlands to treat stormwater should help with much of the rest.

        Collecting nuisance algae to recover as fuel will never be feasible for the same reasons that open ponds are unlikely to ever be feasible bioreactors.  The cost of collection outweighs the possible return.

        So the key is to identify the sources of excess nutrients and find economic ways to convert them to useful by-products.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
          Peopleunit on 03/05/2007 at 2:45 AM
          Posts:
          4
          I just read a progress report on the USDA website regarding manure treatment using anaerobic digestion (composting) and subsequent algae production. The composting stage increased the level of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphates) very significantly rather than reduce them, which in turn proved advantageous to algae growth.

          The critical point (bottleneck) in the process is not in harvesting the algae, but in the subsequent drying stage. They're using artificial heat to speed drying, adding a significant energy expenditure and cost to the process.
          Rate this comment: 12345
          • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
            BRUCE M. GRAUER on 04/24/2007 at 12:44 PM
            Posts:
            3
            Avg Rating:
            5/5
            WE NEED TO SEQUENCE PRODUCTION PROCESSES OF WHATEVER INDUSTRIES SO THAT THE WASTE BYPRODUCTS OF ONE(SUCH AS WASTE HEAT)CAN BE USEFUL IN ANOTHER PRODUCTION PROCESS.I'M THINKING ABOUT THE DRYING STEP OF THE ALGAE.
            Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: 100x potential over conventional agriculture?
      Laz3333 on 04/16/2008 at 4:58 PM
      Posts:
      1
      We have over 25,000 acres of prime saltwater algae growing area available. We are interested in working with some knowledgeable firm. See www.newutopia.org click on "Development Plan"

      Lazarus Long
      239 495 2447
      info@new-utopia.com
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Hold Your Algal Horses!
    kitk on 02/05/2007 at 11:22 PM
    Posts:
    50
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    Hold on! Sure, sounds great, but, as a geologist I can tell you algae is most of what created petroleum in the first place--over millions of years and thousands of square miles per oil field.
      To do the same now, would be great, but we cannot do it all with one old hippie and his backyard pond surrounded by protective hemp fields--as a lot of the proponents seem to envision. No, it WILL take huge patches of real estate--potentially offshore, Florida. It WILL take HUGE amounts of water, and require tens of millions of tons of algae to produce the volume of oil products we need. It can be done, but think of the cost. Give a mega company the incentive, and then they may commit tens of billions of their shareholders's dollars to the work. Don't suck it out with taxes, the government would waste it.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Hold Your Algal Horses!
      asdar on 02/06/2007 at 7:44 AM
      Posts:
      60
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      Algae plants can be placed on marginal land and use brackish water. One hippie isn't the smartest way, but I think the option should be explored.

      I think Florida might just be a good place to have algae beds and might help deal with some of the runoff fertilizer from the farms.

      The most exciting use I see is at coal power plants using the CO2 to power the algae growth.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: Hold Your Algal Horses!
        abcarterjr on 02/07/2007 at 11:24 AM
        Posts:
        45
        Dah, Northern Arizona has the CO2 producing
        power plants and the wide open checkerboard
        spaces. Sneese. Future headline: Checkerboard hippos run algal tube farms near coal fired power plants ,with solar power, and mine water from
        the air with............?



        Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Hold Your Algal Horses!
      Michael543 on 02/09/2007 at 10:42 AM
      Posts:
      8
      Avg Rating:
      2/5
      Potable water isn't required for any algae bioreactor I've seen described.  It's likely that the process of growing algae will have a remediative effect on low-quality water stocks such as treated sewage water, stormwater runoff, the liquid fraction of AD digestate, and brackish well water.

      By growing algae in controlled environments and using nutrient rich water stocks, we could reduce the amount of nuisance algae blooms that occur as a result of the dumping of that wastewater and runoff into streams, rivers and lakes.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Water is the Key
      nick47g on 04/26/2007 at 2:12 PM
      Posts:
      17
      Avg Rating:
      2/5
      Well said Kit K!

      We may not have an energy crisis so much as a WATER CRISIS.

      The Colorado river and Oglala aquifer are already maxed out, so what do we do to get the water for algy farming [top-off to relace water taken up in the biocyle] or even coal gassification [feedstock].

      We need the water in the desert or Montana, so what do we do, pump from the Pacific or Gulf of mexico?

      I have no cle as to solution.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Let our Algal Horses Fly High!
      paulkoti on 06/05/2007 at 10:30 AM
      Posts:
      2
      Avg Rating:
      1/5
      Yes It is much encouraging in the recent days on the devlopments of Algae. Come let us join and prepare the Green World Revolution.  Let all the Research club together for a common Goal of True Revolution of narrowing the economical differnce and enhancing the Global atmosphere equally friendly to all the creatures.
      May the God Lead the people together for a common good, better and the best Earth at an early date before it is too late.
      paulkoti@yahoo.com    
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • ALGAE have (at least) FOUR BIG ADVANTAGES
    Gaetano Marano on 02/07/2007 at 11:13 AM
    Posts:
    50
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    .

    very interesting article!

    in my opinion, algae have (at least) FOUR BIG advantages vs. the agricultural BioFuel production and plants:

    1. algae's production and BioFuels plants can be located on very large (but unused) places of the planet (like deserts)

    2. its production (and production plants) may be very very cheap!

    3. sea-algae will need (near)zero priced saltwater (instead of very expensive potable water)

    4. with sea-algae produced in the desert places NEVER will be any Food-OR-Fuel choice/decision to take

    www.gaetanomarano.it

    .
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: ALGAE have (at least) FOUR BIG ADVANTAGES
      Colin on 02/07/2007 at 4:05 PM
      Posts:
      6
      Three comments:
      1)Brackish water is probably more important to this technology than sea water.  Of all the wells drilled for water around the world each year, many produce water not fit to drink.  Many industrial processes create waste water not fit to drink.  Agricultural runoff creates water quality issues that might be reduced if proper catchment is feasible and economical.  Algae seem able to thrive in this brackish water.

      2)The term "commercial cultivation" probably means that open sea or even open pond algae production is not efficient enough to attract early investment.  Controlling the algal growth environment enables development and use of algae with 50% or more (by volume? by mass?) oil content.  This could be a big money difference if capped ponds or plastic tubes are cheap enough at large scale.

      3)Small scale algae to biofuel operations are probably a great way for enthusiasts to experiment with all the technology, from algae breeding and growth environment enhancement to oil extraction and biodiesel and/or ethanol production.  BONUS--if you create a backyard or rooftop system that one person or one village can easily install, maintain and harvest, imagine what that could mean to people spending too much on fuel/energy all around the world.

      http://www.unh.edu/p2/biodiesel/article_alge.html

      http://www.americanenergyindependence.com/biodiesel.html

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algaculture

      http://www.oilgae.com/

      Go for it!

      Colin
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: ALGAE have (at least) FOUR BIG ADVANTAGES
        RD on 02/26/2007 at 2:14 PM
        Posts:
        47
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
        I'll add another advantage:  Brackish water from underground aquifers such as Orange County, CA, can be used for the ethanol process and be replaced with fresh water during winter rains.
        Rate this comment: