Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Monday, January 01, 2007

China's Coal Future

Continued from page 1

By Peter Fairley

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

In contrast, large-scale efforts to produce liquid transportation fuels using coal gasification are well under way. China's largest coal firm, Shenhua Group, plans to start up the country's first coal-to-fuels plant in 2007 or early 2008, in the world's most ambitious application of coal liquefaction since World War II. Shenhua plans to operate eight liquefaction plants by 2020, producing, in total, more than 30 million tons of synthetic oil annually--enough to displace more than 10 percent of China's projected oil imports.

China's progress in constructing coal-conversion plants puts it far ahead of the United States, where coal gasification is still recovering from a damaged reputation. Gasification demonstration programs initiated in the U.S. after the energy crises of the 1970s were orphaned when oil and gas prices plummeted in the 1980s. That left many with the impression that the technology itself was unreliable (see "Carbon Dioxide for Sale," July 2005). In China, by contrast, oil never looked cheap, and coal has never lost its shine.

Coal and Cashmere

Northern China is fast becoming the epicenter of China's energy industry. The leading draw is the Shenfu Dongsheng coalfield, a 31,000-square-kilometer solid layer of shallow coal that stretches from the northern tip of China's Shaanxi Province to the southern edge of Nei Mongol, or Inner Mongolia. The Dongsheng field's estimated reserve of 223.6 billion tons of coal makes it the world's seventh largest; efforts to convert much of that coal to transportation fuels could make it the world's most profitable.

Until recently, Inner Mongolia's coal capital, Erdos, was largely untouched by the modern world, bounded by mountain ranges and the Great Wall to the south and by the Yellow River to the north. Its isolation is now over, thanks to freshly poured highways and new rail lines rolling over its fissured hills and steep valleys. An airport should open this year.

Erdos's GDP doubled between 2001 and 2004, largely because of coal, chemicals, and cashmere (Erdos supplies a quarter of the world's cashmere). To reach the coalfields, you drive 40 minutes south of the city, passing a 1950s-era mausoleum for Genghis Khan, the 13th-century warrior who conquered much of Asia. As you approach the dry floodplain of the Wulanmulun River, the imposing infrastructure of a dozen coal mines, including some of the world's largest and most mechanized, leaps out of the barren landscape. The region is also home to several hundred smaller, less modern mines (gases and cave-ins kill at least 6,000 Chinese coal miners a year). Miners on their day off zip by on mopeds, three or four to a vehicle, racing past 40-ton trucks heaped with coal. Along the highway, coal-­sorting terminals load railcars destined for power plants and ports on the industrialized east coast.

None of that infrastructure and activity, however, prepares a visitor for Shenhua's coal-to-fuels complex, which rises from a plateau cut into the hills. It is an impressive site, with its own coal-fired power plant, gasification plants, and two massive reactors where coal will be liquefied, each weighing 2,250 metric tons (Shenhua claimed the world hoisting record when it lifted the reactors into place last June). Flush from a $2.95 billion IPO in 2005 and $5 billion in annual revenues from its integrated mines, railroads, and power plants, Shenhua is rapidly expanding its operations. It sold 113 million metric tons of coal in just the first half of 2006, nearly matching the previous year's total. If Shenhua maintains that pace this year, it may become the world's largest producer of coal.

January/February 2007

Would you like to read more articles from the January/February 2007 issue?

This article is from the January/February 2007 Issue of Technology Review. To read other articles from this issue simply register for My.TechnologyReview.com. It's free.

Subscribe today and save up to 41% »

Comments

  • Has anyone considered a band-aid?
    Krakhan on 01/16/2007 at 3:25 PM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    I read just about every day about the problem of too much C-O-2 and such coming from coal-fired power plants, even the gasified ones. Unfortunately, coal is the cheapest and most abundant source of fuel for powerplants, except for hydroelectric, and that depends on rivers that are not always conveniently located.
    Has anyone thought to begin by creating c-o-2 "band-aids" on these plants?
    By this I mean a "dry-ice" or CO2 extracter-plant next to the powerplant. The dryice can be buried in old mines or shipped to other factories for other uses.
    On a similar basis, we have the technology to add particulate removal systems to the various other Chinese industries to remove the smoke and smog polluntants from the Atmosphere before they fully leave the smoke stacks.

    Just a thought. Something along the idea of doing applying intermediate fixes while the final big fix is developed.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Maglev is German
    jack_ryan on 01/19/2007 at 7:17 PM
    Posts:
    1
    Hello,

    maybe somewhat off-topic, but just for clarification: the magnetically levitated train is the Transrapid, built by Thyssen-Krupp and Siemens.
    While the basic technology was patented in 1933 by Herrmann Kemper, a small-scale version of the train had its maiden trip in 1971, at a time when Chinese were still waving Mao's red bible.
    By continuous, cooperative research at Thyssen and Univ. Braunschweig it got todays looks and capabilities.

    Have a look here:

    http://www.transrapid.de
    http://www.thyssenkrupp-transrapid.de/
    http://www.juergen-koerner.de/tr_gesch.htm
    http://www.iabg.de/transrapid/technik/index_de.php

    or Goooooooogle for it.

    The Chinese can be hailed for building the first commercially
    used 30 km tracks from Pudong airport to downtown Shanghai, while a test track stands here in Lathen, Germany for some 25 years now.

    Regards
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Gasification is not cleaner than pulverized coal plants
    tb5036t on 01/21/2007 at 2:49 AM
    Posts:
    2
    If IGCC was cleaner, 50-60% efficient, CO2 capture ready and only 15-25% more expensive then no one, including TXU, would attempt to build PC plants.
    The reality is that today's modern PC plants with BACT are as clean as IGCC, their efficiency is 40-45% in line with IGCC (yes, IGCC is a lot less efficient than 50-60%) and they are a lot more CO2 capture ready than IGCC. Post combustion CO2 capture in a PC plant is a tail end process requiring no major modifications to the plant while pre combustion CO2 capture IGCC is a costly proposition requiring major changes to the plant including adding shift reactor and switching to hydrogen turbine that does not even exist. The reality is also that IGCC costs a lot more than 15-25% more than PC and, bringing it to par with PC in terms of reliability and availability, costs a lot more.

    The simple but painful solution to global warming is a high tax on CO2 emissions from all sources. Higher cost will drive all of us to use energy more efficiently, to use less CO2 intensive energy sources and to develop and apply better CO2 capture technologies including to PC boilers.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • climate change is NOT one of the causes of the low water levels in the Yellow River
    suBWKEURRWE on 02/03/2007 at 2:07 PM
    Posts:
    2
    It is just plain WRONG to say that climate change has anything to do with the low water levels in the Yellow River.  The consesus view on climate warming is that the temperature has risen world wide approximately .5 to 1 degree C in the last 100 years.  The impact of climate changes on the water levels in the Yellow River are so small as to be unmeasureable. 
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: climate change is NOT one of the causes of the low water levels in the Yellow River
      RayPhoenix on 03/14/2007 at 2:07 AM
      Posts:
      1
      That's a pretty sweeping claim. Could you please list your sources? Also, remember that .5-1 degree change is an average, and climate change has already produced very large effects on some ecosystems, not to mention glaciers, early springs, late falls, and other phenomena. Without pointers to sources, I would suggest: "climate change may NOT be ..." Finally, since it's climate change we're discussing, not global warming, see the following article, which sheds light on the process by which decreased rainfall can be related to air pollution: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-03/thuo-psc030707.php
      Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review January/February 2009
Lifeline for Renewable Power
Without a radically expanded and smarter electrical grid, wind and solar will remain niche power sources.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology