Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement
« Back 1 2 3 [4]

Thursday, January 04, 2007

Part I: China's Coal Future

Continued from page 3

By Peter Fairley

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

But for the Chinese government, the rewards could be worth the risk. Despite its 2005 IPO of some assets, ­Shenhua remains a largely state-owned firm, and the direct-­liquefaction plant serves a critical state interest: energy security. "No matter how big the cost, Shenhua will build it," says Zhou Zhijie, a gasification expert at East China University of Science and Technology's Institute of Clean Coal Technology in Shanghai. "China's government will support this project until the liquid flows."

Of course, if the new plant works, Shenhua stands to earn a substantial profit. The company predicts that its synthetic oil will turn a profit at roughly $30 a barrel, though many analysts say $45 is more realistic. (The U.S. Department of Energy's most recent price forecast predicts that crude oil will dip to $47 a barrel in 2014, then climb steadily to $57 a barrel in 2030.) Hedging its bets, Shenhua has also entered a preliminary agreement with partners Shell and Sasol concerning several similar-sized or bigger Fischer-Tropsch fuel plants in Northern China, which would start up in 2012.

Shenhua's Chinese coal competitors, too, are already breaking ground on their versions of coal-to-fuel plants. The Yankuang coal group, the second-largest coal producer in China, is planning a Fischer-Tropsch fuel plant near Erdos that will use a proprietary gasifier and catalyst.

Beyond the risks inherent in the large-scale deployment of unproven technology, the gasification building boom also is an environmental gamble. Indeed, what may ultimately check China's coal-to-oil ambitions is water. China's Coal Research Institute estimates that Shenhua's plant will consume 10 tons of water for every ton of synthetic oil produced (360 gallons of water per barrel of oil), and the ratio is even worse for Fischer-Tropsch plants. Last summer, China's National Development and Reform Commission, the powerful body charged with regulating China's economy and approving large capital projects, issued a warning about the environmental consequences of the "runaway development" of synthetic-oil and chemical plants, which it said will consume tens of millions of cubic meters of water annually.

That prediction sounds particularly ominous in northern China, where water is scarce. Erdos is a mix of scrub and desert whose meager water supplies are already overtaxed by population growth and existing power plants. Zhou Ji Sheng, who as vice manager of ZMMF, one of Shenhua's Erdos-based competitors, is seeking financing for a gasification project, acknowledges that water scarcity could put an end to coal gasification in the area. "Even though we have so much coal, if we have no water, we will just have to use the traditional way--to dig it out and transport it," he says. "Water is the key factor for us to develop this new industry." Zhou says his firm plans to supplement its water supply by building a 120-kilometer pipeline to the Yellow River. But evaporation from hydroelectric reservoirs, the increased demand of growing cities and industries, and the effects of climate change mean that in the summer, the Yellow River barely reaches the sea.

Part II of the story will be published January 5.

Peter Fairley, a Technology Review contributing writer, traveled to China in October.

« Back 1 2 3 [4]
January/February 2007

Would you like to read more articles from the January/February 2007 issue?

This article is from the January/February 2007 Issue of Technology Review. To read other articles from this issue simply register for My.TechnologyReview.com. It's free.

Subscribe today and save up to 41% »

Comments

  • Undermining American foreign policy
    gabrielg01 on 01/04/2007 at 1:48 PM
    Posts:
    317
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    China's development of coal-based fuels, as an alternative to oil is a clear case of outsmarting American power politics.

    America's increasing presence and domination in the Middle East and Central Asia is driven by the goal to project economic power all over the world. Today we have military bases even in the formerly Soviet states of Central Asia (Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kirgyzstan). Check this link out:
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2002/020209-attack01.htm
    The point is that even if the USA is not reliant on this oil, these oil reserves represent such a gigantic value that dominating them gives America the economic power levers to the world economy. Or so the assumption goes.

    This assumption is being challenged, and possibly proven wrong today. Brasil is shifting to ethanol (several South American countries will follow suit), and China is shifting to liquefied coal. Europe will shift to liquefied coal too, when they get fed up with the Russian bullying and blackmailing. Nuclear power will see a new renaissance as well. There will be a convergence of green technologies too: much improved batteries, fuel-cells, photovoltaic and windpower. All this will lead to increased independence from the oil-bullies.

    The oil-bullies of the world, OPEC, America and Russia will be left with much diminished economic domination. As for us Americans, we will never get our money's worth out of these oil-adventures. The oil and military barons will get rich of course, but the rest of us will see no benefit.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Undermining American foreign policy
      jpdemers on 01/05/2007 at 2:10 AM
      Posts:
      34
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      China's gain is not necessarily our loss.

      The US has coal reserves rivaling those of China.  We will no doubt follow China's lead and build our own gasification plants -- I don't see that we even have a choice. 
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • America is an oil bully?
      badspine on 01/19/2007 at 2:59 PM
      Posts:
      1
      America is an oil bully? When did this happen? Apparantly between causing global warming, causing people to starve all over the world, and causing EVERY OTHER SINGLE problem in the world, now we're an oil bully too. Sounds like another cheesy rallying cry for America bashers.

      I did a project on Fischer Trospch (Ft) fuels for my grad school and many aspects of Ft fuels would be great for America. One of the major problems with adopting these fuels is environmental regulations (according to some environmentalists / alarmists, the Ft process for creating fuel causes as much polution as burning natural fossil fuels) and the threat of Saudi Arabia and OPEC crushing the oil market by lowering oil prices dramatically (look up a company called syntek (I think thats the spelling) in the 1980s.

      There are backers that are very interested in pursuing Ft fuels. Recently, the CEO of Jet Blue Airlines contacted General Electric about this idea. GE was too afraid to pursue this technology, due to Saudi Arabia and OPEC's ability to effect oil prices. The only way American companies would build Ft plants is if the United States government promised to buy the fuel if the price / barrel (PPB) dropped below a certain point. However, certain groups would proclaim this as government welfare for oil companies. So, despite being an excellent idea, Ft fuels may not be seen being produced in America anytime soon.

      China is a different story altogether. They really have no social conscious and no special interest groups to deal with. They just do whatever is necessary to move along. For example, they don't respect copyright laws, do business readily with countries that don't respect child labor laws, etc. In many ways adopting a dramatic shift in energy production is much easier in China than the U.S. In particular, the U.S. can't even drill for oil in its own territory, let alone pursue new courses of fuel production because of environmental concerns (but yet, we're oil bullies).
      Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review January/February 2009
Lifeline for Renewable Power
Without a radically expanded and smarter electrical grid, wind and solar will remain niche power sources.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology