Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

How Plug-in Hybrids Will Save the Grid

The use of vehicles that run on electricity could be a boon to the ailing electrical grid.

By Kevin Bullis

Thursday, December 21, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Major automakers and the Department of Energy are pouring money into research on plug-in hybrid vehicles. These cars promise to cut petroleum consumption by allowing commuters to drive to work using primarily electricity--stored on board in batteries--rather than gas. Although critics have warned that the vehicles could put too much pressure on an already strained electrical grid, experts are now arguing that rather than being a strain on the grid, plug-in hybrids may actually help prevent brownouts, cut the cost of electricity, and increase the use of renewable energy.

Small companies are already making kits that allow drivers to commute using electricity from the grid (stored in extra batteries shown here). When major automakers start making the kits, will charging these cars be too much for the grid to handle?
Credit: Technology Review

Plug-in hybrids, like today's hybrid cars, can run on either an electric motor or an internal combustion engine. But plug-ins have much larger battery packs and can be recharged by being plugged into the wall, making it possible to rely much more on the electric motor. Although a handful of companies sell conversion kits to change conventional hybrids into plug-ins, the kits add thousands of dollars to the cost of the car (see "Plug-In Hybrids Are on the Way"). This additional cost, which is primarily from the batteries, is one of the reasons the major automakers haven't yet mass produced such vehicles, although they are now developing them. GM, for example, recently committed to making a plug-in version of a Saturn SUV (see "GM's Plug-In Hybrid").

The concern is that plug-ins are not a good way to reduce gasoline consumption, because if they become popular, and millions of car owners recharged their cars at three in the afternoon on a hot day, it would crash the grid. But plug-in hybrids could actually help stabilize the grid if owners charged their cars at times of low demand, and if the vehicles could return excess energy to the grid when it's needed--say while parked in the company lot at work during peak demand.

Since utilities have built enough power plants to provide electricity when people are operating their air conditioners at full blast, they have excess generating capacity during off-peak hours. As a result, according to an upcoming report from the Pacific Northwestern National Laboratory (PNNL), a Department of Energy lab, there is enough excess generating capacity during the night and morning to allow more than 80 percent of today's vehicles to make the average daily commute solely using this electricity. If plug-in-hybrid or all-electric-car owners charge their vehicles at these times, the power needed for about 180 million cars could be provided simply by running these plants at full capacity.

This could be a boon to utilities, because they'd be able to sell more power without the added cost of building more plants. Ideally, this will translate into lower electricity prices, says Robert Pratt, a scientist at PNNL. It might also help utilities justify the added capital costs of building cleaner coal-burning plants, because they'll be able to recover their investment faster by "selling more electricity with the same set of iron, steel, and concrete," Pratt says.

Story continues below

Such a system could be further optimized by using smart chargers and other electronics. This system would include a charger that runs on a timer, charging cars only during off-peak hours. Researchers at PNNL are taking this a step further with smart chargers that use the Internet to gather information about electricity demand. Utilities could then temporarily turn off chargers in thousands of homes or businesses to keep the grid from crashing after a spike in demand.

The next step would be to add smart meters that would track electricity use in real time and allow utilities to charge more for power used during times of peak demand, and less at off-peak hours. Coupled with such a system, the PNNL smart charger could ensure that the plug-in batteries are charged only when the electricity is at its cheapest, saving consumers money.

Comments

  • Hybrids as emergency or off-grid energy source
    Please see the letter to Toyota from 2001 under "Life with the Prius Hybrid" at www.steverose.com for a further understanding of why a standard hybrid (no additional batteries required, but works in either case) is an excellent and surprisingly economical source of household electricity, requiring only a small software change (locking the inverter at 60 Hz) and adding a socket.  Unfortunately, Toyota never responded.

    Aloha,
    Steve
    Rate this comment: 12345

    steverose
    12/21/2006
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • what I don't get
    A big part of the cost of a plug in hybrid is for the batteries, and the lifetime of those batteries is (mostly) relient on the number of times they are charged and discharged.  Won't using them to bolster the reliability of the grid really just shorten their life span.  Essentially won't the owner be losing money in the long run, because their batteries will last shorter than they would have.  I don't think the pennies difference in electricity prices will offsett the price that is incurred on the owner of the car for battery degradation.  Please correct me if I am wrong.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    meistro
    12/21/2006
    Posts:2
    • Re: what I don't get
      Current battery technology works that way.  However, a lot of money and time is being spent on finding ways to improve battery life and performance - sometimes with nanotechnology.

      Of course the first few generations of PHEVs are not going to have batteries that are not radically different than we have now, but the buyers are probably enthusiasts and probably won't mind the extra cost or incovenience.  After a few generations, the technology will be ready for prime-time (or so we hope).
      Rate this comment: 12345

      captnsaj
      12/21/2006
      Posts:2
    • Re: what I don't get
      Battery life is most affected by operating temperature and depth of discharge.  Increase either and the battery life shortens.  The study did not assume that battery would be full discharged, or that they would be operating under extreme thermal conditions.  A 10% discharge on a typical lead-acid battery gets 5000 cycles, but a 100% discharge only 500 cycles.  A typical lead acid will live 10 years at 35C but could live 30 years or more at 15C. 

      The V2G assumption is that battery charging takes place whenever you're home and so you're plugged in anyway, and more often off-peak.  Typically there is a grid emergency requiring fast-acting reserves once a day and then only for less than a minute or two.  The draw rate can be controlled based on how much is available and should be used to prevent overresponses anyway. Such microdischarges can allow to 300,000 to 500,000 battery cycles.  As a result this shouldn't shorten battery life appreciably. 

      Personally, I didn't get the IP address thing.  If we plug into buildings that have meters that understand real-time prices for both energy and ancillary services such as spinning reserves, then whenever we help the grid, we get a credit on our bill.  Why get fancy when AMR is already capable of doing the job.  What's more why don't we just call it even and charge the battery for free in exchange for a small fraction of the discharge capacity as grid reserve.  Ancillary services are really worth about 50% of energy anyway.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      chassin
      12/22/2006
      Posts:1
    • Re: what I don't get
      True and Not True ...

      Yes, battery life depends strongly on the cycling depth of discharge (and op temp).  However, the depth of discharge concept is not quite applicable in the PHEV.  For "normal" HEV, battery runs between 35-50 and 70-75% SOC depending on the OEM strategy.  The main advantage of the PHEV is to extend that electric energy storage by replacing the 5Ah battery with, says, a 50Ah battery.  Therefore, battery still operates in the similar SOC ranges in PHEV, but you get 20Ah instead of 2Ah running in electric power alone.

      Another nice feature with PHEV is that the battery are running at a much lower rate (Amps per surface area) which allows low or mid-power and somewhat "immature" battery chemistries become a major player.  That is, it is safe enough to use your existing laptop Li-Ion battery technology to run a car as you are only charging/discharging at 2 to 3C-rate and <<5C-rate (for a 40-50Ah pack).  Otherwise, your battery will need to run at 10 to 20C-rate (for typical 3 to 6Ah HEV packs).

      The main disadvantages are: (1) carrying all those extra battery weight at least 10 times more, (1a) loss of cargo space, (2) extra set of charging equipment - on or off-board, and (3) larger motor to allow extended period running at all electric mode and at a higher/reasonable speed.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      DrWelly
      01/02/2007
      Posts:6
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • Smart chargers
    Make smart chargers mandatory and there will be no problem with grid crashes. Unless people cheat a lot.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    protn7
    12/21/2006
    Posts:58
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
  • Already too expensive
    OK so we are not buying hybrids because the
    batteries and electronics are too expensive.
    The ones we have, don't come with extention
    cords because they are too expensive.
      The power company wants to add a bunch of junk
    onto the system to control your use, and
    that won't be too expensive?!?!!!
    Don't let this crap be required on hybirds.
    Adding all these electronics will ruin them.
    That is how the power company destroyed private
    windmills.  They require electronics to meld
    into the grid that raises the costs well above
    the break even point.
    Let me have a windmill whose sole purpose is to
    charge my cars.  A windmill, a couple batteries
    for capturing the day's power and a cord to pass
    it all to my car at night.
    It could even do it all in DC since the distances
    are short. (but that would be a hazard to stupid
    people)
    Rate this comment: 12345

    SirLanse
    12/21/2006
    Posts:40
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Already too expensive
      Dear Sir Lancelot
      I fully understand your windmill obsession and share your paranoia about their demise.
      However, the power company should add "junk" to your meter to offer you cheaper electricity in off-peak periods. Your hybrid would then charge up during the cheapest part of the night. The effect is like adding millions of capacitors to the grid where energy can be stored. Your total cost should go down. You might even have spare cash to build your pet windmill (which you will find out wont generate nearlly enough electricity to charge your hybrid - even on windy days)
      Rate this comment: 12345

      donkeyboy
      12/21/2006
      Posts:2
      • Re: Already too expensive
        Lancelot points out one important point about DC power.  Hybrids run off DC power, but your line power is AC.  As another point tries to point out that with a parallel hybrid you "could" sync the alternator output to 60Hz, but that's easier said than done too and it's not set up to run as an inverter.  Said inverters that would employ a grid tie such as used by wind and solar users to supply power back to the grid are not cheap.  They generally start at $1000-2000 range.  They are also not 100% efficient.  Every conversion from AC to DC and then back again to AC will cost you anywhere from 5-10% each time.  Will the power company pay for all this equipment and for the lost electricity to allow use of the hybrids as a big energy storage pool?  I'm guessing that this is all pie in the sky, which while technically it can be done, it would be expensive and unworkable for the above reasons.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        bpost911
        12/22/2006
        Posts:1
        • Re: Already too expensive
          Point taken, my capacitor analogy implies it is easy to pump the stored energy back into the grid. That is wrong, it probably isn’t feasible. The article does not imply that either - it simply proposes a new use for underutilized capacity on the grid. Let’s not confuse the two problems.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          donkeyboy
          12/22/2006
          Posts:2
      • Re: Already too expensive
        What will be too expensive is to delay in facing the enormous problems acumulating from Climate Change.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Stu
        12/29/2006
        Posts:1
    • Re: Already too expensive
      Having a private windmill will ruin whatever land you have, and why go through all that trouble just because you oppose of plug-ins?  You'd have to like in Antarctica to get that much wind.  Plug-ins do not ruin cars,and they do not take up space- unlike windmills...  If you see wrong in this- just join the Honda and Toyota dealers- and no one there will disagree.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Kevtyo
      01/17/2007
      Posts:4
      Avg Rating:
      1/5
  • Wrong End of the Problem
    Why do we keep trying to increase the supply and variety of fuel sources for personal cars?  If we attacked the demand side of the problem and increased the availability and efficiency of public transportation, we would not have the extent of the fuel or traffic problems that we are trying to solve our way out of. 
    Rate this comment: 12345

    slipperyweas...
    12/21/2006
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Wrong End of the Problem
      Sure, attack the consumer. Right. How do you want to kill them? My God, this is a leftist dream--dupe the consumer into paying off everything, buying a system that will drain itself just before time to drive home. Then, of course taxes will go up for energy use. Even if this worked, some, any error in the controls would drain too much, or overload the projected millions of plugged-in cars at work parking lots, after the tens of millions of dollars spent to add all the convenient plugs. The only part of this that makes ANY sense is a smart, night-time charger. I will stick with my gas-guzzling old Scout, as I live far from town.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      kitk
      12/21/2006
      Posts:60
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: Wrong End of the Problem
        Much of the hydrogen power, EV, zero pollution drive is from political nanny-staters and environmentalist whackos. Every proposal requires more mandatory controls on peoples behavior. The proposals also require big outlays of money [taxes] to make the change then to buy and use those vehicles will be too expensive. Get out your bicycles.
        What we need is to gradually ease over to non-petroleum fuels made from plants and supplement those with electricity. A steam-electric hybrid can use any liquid or gaseous fuel and plug in too. Hydrogen power is hype, because it will take up to a century or more to make it practical, EV's are tied to the electrical grid, short ranges and long recharge times. E-mail - beesidemeusa@yahoo.co.uk - for more about this idea.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        beesidemeusa
        12/21/2006
        Posts:4
        • Re: Wrong End of the Problem
          I'm intrigued by the whole renewable energy from plants arguement. I've read a fair amount about recent ethanol manufacturing advances, and compared to dependence on foreign oil, it's practically utopia. But I don't see how this stands up as a long term solution. With water resources already stretched to the breaking point in many regions, plus ground water pollution generated by large-scale agriculture, it seems we will be heading down another dead end with this. Maybe we can figure out a way to make ethanol from sage brush and cactus?
          Rate this comment: 12345

          tla723
          12/21/2006
          Posts:20
          Avg Rating:
          4/5
          • Re: Wrong End of the Problem
            Fortune magazine had a good article about the pit falls of ethanol a few months ago.  In essence, food costs are rising and will continue to rise as food sources are sold at oil equivalent prices.  It takes enough corn to fill a 25 gallon tank to feed a man for a year.  So, ethanol may be renewable, but you may pay the difference out in higher food costs.  Just something to think about.
            Rate this comment: 12345

            theredspade
            12/24/2006
            Posts:1
            • Re: Wrong End of the Problem
              The inevitable food v fuel pressure and the inability of biofuels to cover even our present day transportation fuel needs is why we need to focus on electricity.  We know we need to make the grid ever more renewable and green.  Plug-in hybrids and electric cars allow that green power to do double duty - replacing petroleum miles with electric miles. Zero-emission electric generation and zero-emission cars.  Helped by solar rebates and credits, PV and an EV is a reality today for hundreds of Californians. Zero'd out electric bill and nothing spent for gasoline.  Were plug-in cars available in showrooms, and they could be, tens of thousands already generating power with solar and wind could power their cars, too. With good federal policy, millions could truly live green beyond their most utopian dream.
              Rate this comment: 12345

              Marc Geller
              12/26/2006
              Posts:1
              • Re: Wrong End of the Problem
                I’m building my own Plug-in hybrid right now with the help of Calcars.org.  Once, I am done with that, I plan to use solar power collected from the roof of my home to power my commute to work everyday.  Why should we keep paying for consumables that we don’t need anymore?
                Follow along here.
                http://priuschat.com/My-official-Prius-Plus-mods-thread-t26951.html
                Rate this comment: 12345

                Cheap!
                12/27/2006
                Posts:1
                • Re: Wrong End of the Problem
                  What time of the day do you commute?  Your solar system may require significant energy storage to pull that off?
                  Rate this comment: 12345

                  doteman
                  01/15/2007
                  Posts:6
                  Avg Rating:
                  5/5
      • Re: Wrong End of the Problem
        The US uses about 20 million barrels of oil per day.  Oil is now around $65 per barrel, wholesale, and over $80 per barrel for refined fuels at retail.  That means US consumers now spend at least $600 Billion for fuel annually.  And since production, refining, and retail costs are less than $30 per barrel when averaged over all sources of oil, $375 Billion of that is profit at various levels.  That’s the ‘rightist’ dream, in contrast to what you call the ‘leftist’ dream of vehicle-to-grid.  Which do you think is cheaper?  Fattening some oil shareholder’s wallet to the tune of $600 Billion per year, or V2G?  And that’s completely ignoring the other imperatives behind V2G, like pollution reduction and ending dependence on foreign oil.  Your concerns about vehicle batteries being drained too much or overcharged too much can all be addressed with electronics and software.  Chronic disbelievers who can’t bring themselves to trust the electronics can still own a plug-in-hybrid, but use a current interrupter to ensure the grid can’t draw anything from their batteries.  V2G sounds a lot cheaper than $600 Billion per year for oil.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Steve
        12/22/2006
        Posts:5
    • Re: Wrong End of the Solution
      This is less about more energy for cars, than solving the "burstiness" of electrical demand in a distributed win-win (non-zero sum) manner that benefits in many ways.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Hamish.MacEw...
      12/24/2006
      Posts:1
  • TechReview story being picked up broadly
    This report is being cited and discussed by blogs all over, and, notably, by
    http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/12/plugin_hybrids_2.php
    http://www.autobloggreen.com/2006/12/24/lifecycle-analysis-of-gas-hybrid-and-electric-cars
    http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/12/24/17371/067
    http://digg.com/design/Plug_In_Hybrids_Could_Help_Stabilize_The_Grid

    If you're looking for the latest info on plug-in hybrids and vehicle-to-grid, check out our
    http://www.calcars.org/news-archive.html
    http://www.calcars.org/faq.html
    (sorry, this site doesn't seem to accept html)

    -- Felix Kramer, Founder, CalCars.org
    Rate this comment: 12345

    felixkramer
    12/25/2006
    Posts:2
  • A massive mobile subsidy
    If buying batteries and connecting them to the grid would allow the battery-owner to profitably buy low and sell high, then the utilities themselves would already be doing it. They are not. It's simply not (yet) cost effective to store then release the electricity. I don't understand why a fleet of mobile batteries would change the economics.

    If hybrid owners were required to carry excess storage capacity, it would be a massive subsidy to the utilities who could leverage that not-so-smart-grid without having to carry the capital cost of buying the batteries themselves.


    Rate this comment: 12345

    paulneedham
    12/27/2006
    Posts:1
  • I don't trust the utilities
    If the utilities had this much control, they'd probably use it to increase, not lower prices.  California's energy deregulation was a mess.  You need proper policy controls to prevent corporate abuse of the system.  Or allow car owners, not the companies, to control input and output settings in their own best interest.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    daveminh
    12/27/2006
    Posts:1
    • Re: I don't trust the utilities
      They have NOT done much to engender our trust.  Mine, PG&E (N., Calif.) pays some lip service to being a good guy with programs like their school solar grants.  This program is interesting because, they spend 10 times what they give to the schools in ads patting themselves on the back for doing it...  They have been very obstructive in the net metering programs, in my case they delayed installation of TOU metering far beyound the stated 1 month stated in their own rate structure filings. (I had to call on this fact to get it done after 5 months of waiting for TOU meter installation.)....  Their rates have risen considerably in the last year, over 15% overall, but it has been hidden by changes to the usage tier structure rates so they could claim that the basic rate hadn't changed.  The fact is, very few people can live within that base line tier.  The company is very good at obscureing their real actions.  Any wonder why we don't trust them?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Jimbaber
      12/31/2006
      Posts:1
      • Re: I don't trust the utilities
        Suspect part of  CA Utility problems is use of natural gas electric plants using natural gas from Wyoming.  We use coal and nuclear back here in midwest.  I think natural gas is too valuable as a chemical raw materail source and heating source for homes for it to be used for electricity production ?  Why doesn't West and Northwest use more coal or nuclear and gradually increase wind and solar for their electric generation ?  As soon as Midwest and East Coast have cold weather gas prices rise and you feel cold winters draft in your electric bill ?
        Rate this comment: 12345

        naturlm
        01/23/2007
        Posts:10
        Avg Rating:
        2/5
  • America's Energy Crisis
    As the Democratic Convention wraps up and the hoopla of the Republican Convention heats up Americans are still left with a sense of a lot of hot air of any concrete plans to end the energy crisis in America. Northerners dread the upcoming onset of fall and colder weather wondering how they will be able to afford how to keep their homes and families warm. Southerners have been sweating the high cost of energy raising the thermostat to save on their electric bills. Families everywhere are wondering where else they can cut back to cover the cost of fueling up the family vehicle to get back and forth to work and take care of the necessities of life. There is no money left for relaxation and family fun. The stress level continues to rise. The average electric bill has risen 16% to cover the power companies additional production costs. A gallon of milk is almost as precious as a gallon of gas. The cost of every consumer product has risen sharply. American's are stretched to the limit. Jobs are being lost, foreclosures are increasing at an alarming rate. Seems even the family pets are suffering the high cost of fuel as almost daily a new story is on TV about shelters being forced to euthanize record number of surrendered pets from those forced out of their homes or no longer able to care for them. The energy crisis in our country is far reaching and needs immediate attention. I am hoping whoever gets elected will get their act together and make this their #1 priority.

    An interesting site to share...

    www.themanhattanprojectof2009.com
    www.howmuchenergydoesmycaruse.com

    Rate this comment: 12345

    BeyondGreen
    08/29/2008
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • hybrids are not really ready for the mainstream public
    I agree that plug-in hybrids or even plain hybrids are not really ready for the mainstream public who wants to save money. But, for those who can afford to make a difference in the environment as well as reducing foreign oil consumption and still be able to drive a car with ford focus parts that is similar to what we’ve grown used to, they are the best options at the moment.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    MickeyFouse
    01/23/2009
    Posts:47
    Avg Rating:
    1/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review July/August 2009

Current Issue

Search Me
Inside the launch of Stephen Wolfram’s new “computational knowledge engine.”
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.