Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

Solar-Powered Hydrogen Generation

Rust-based solar panels could make hydrogen cheap and efficient.

By Kevin Bullis

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Researchers in Switzerland have demonstrated more-efficient water-splitting solar cells based on a cheap, abundant, and long-lasting material: rust. The advance could lead to a cheap and energy-efficient way to generate hydrogen for fuel-cell vehicles using solar energy.

Water-splitting solar panels would have important advantages over existing technologies in terms of hydrogen production. Right now, the primary way to make hydrogen is to separate it from natural gas, a process that generates carbon dioxide and undercuts the main motivation for moving to hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles: ending dependence on fossil fuels. The current alternative is electrolysis, which uses electricity to break water into hydrogen and oxygen, with the two gases forming at opposite electrodes. Although electrolysis is costly, it can be cleaner if the source of the electricity is wind, sun, or some other carbon-free source.

But if the source of the electricity is the sun, it would be much more efficient to use solar energy to produce hydrogen by a photochemical process inside the cell itself. By improving the efficiency of such solar panels, Michael Grätzel, chemistry professor at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, in Switzerland, and his colleagues have taken an important step toward this goal.

The researchers have shown that by including small amounts of silicon and cobalt, they can grow nanostructured thin films of iron oxide that convert sunlight into the electrons needed to form hydrogen from water. And the iron oxide films do this more efficiently than ever before with this material.

Iron oxide has long been an appealing material for such solar panels, in part because it holds up well in contact with water. But although it can absorb sunlight, the resulting charge carriers could not easily escape the material, so they recombined, canceling each other out before they could split any water. By doping the rust with silicon, the researchers coaxed the material to form cauliflower-like structures with extremely high surface area, ensuring that a large part of the atoms in the material were in contact with the water, or very close to it. That way, holes could easily escape into the water, where they prompt the generation of oxygen gas. The silicon also improves electron conductivity in the material, which is important for generating hydrogen gas at an opposite electrode. The researchers further improved the process by adding cobalt, which acts as a catalyst for the reactions.

[1] 2 Next »

Comments

  • What "holes" are we talking about?
    clauder357 on 12/14/2006 at 5:15 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    That way, holes could easily escape into the water, where they prompt the generation of oxygen gas.

    sorry I did not undersatnd , here.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: What
      ralf on 12/14/2006 at 5:05 PM
      Posts:
      1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      A hole is the shortage of an electron.
      When the electons move from left to right, a "hole" (absence of an electron) moves from right to left. When water splits and the oxigen atoms combine, electons move into the wire to fill up the "hole". It is as if "holes" move into the water. The H atoms combine with H2O to form 2 H3O+, which travel to the other end of the wire where they pick up electons and form water and H2 molecules.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Whats wrong with using electricity from regular photoelectric cells to drive electrolysis outside the cell?
    curtismartz on 03/03/2007 at 11:05 PM
    Posts:
    3
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
    What is the point of pursuing a device to facilitate hydrogen production only, when to achieve  the same result one could simply attach a traditional solar cell to a traditional electrolysis cell.Wouldn't this be more practical and efficient? The electricity is the important part is it not?This is an interesting concept;however,
    why not devote this human energy into increasing the efficiency and implementation of PV cells and skip the sidetracking?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Whats wrong with using electricity from regular photoelectric cells to drive electrolysis outside the cell?
      edmondgreen on 03/04/2007 at 1:20 PM
      Posts:
      1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      This is such a fascinating technology with exciting potential. Thank you for the excellent question. Here's my thoughts on your question:

      It's simply more energy efficient to convert sunlight directly to hydrogen. PV is, at best, 30% efficient, multiplied by the 10% efficiency of the Swiss process and you get about a total of 3% energy efficiency. By energy efficiency, I believe what's meant is for a given amount of sunlight energy striking the surface of either the PV cell or the photoelectric hydrogen electrode, only 10% (in the case of the Swiss photoelectrode) is converted to an equivalent amount of hydrogen.

      (I am a Ph.D. researcher in the field of Materials Chemistry and Process Development with an abiding interest in photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation. I have worked on organo-metallic doped titania films as electrode materials for photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation. Clearly, the Swiss technology is a real breakthrough especially in terms of electrode stability and energy conversion efficiency. I'm looking forward to reading about more breakthroughs in these areas).
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: Whats wrong with using electricity from regular photoelectric cells to drive electrolysis outside the cell?
        profchuck on 10/30/2007 at 1:46 PM
        Posts:
        1
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        The issue here is end-to-end energy budget.  There are energy requirements for the manufacture of both solar electrolytic and ferric oxide systems  and there are also efficiency issues related to the operation of the product.  This concept is very interesting and shows enough promise that it should be studied further.  I would like to see a determination of the overall energy cost for manufacture and operation including periodic servicing for both approaches.   What is the cost in watt hours and dollars per watt of final product?  That would be an interesting comparison.  
        Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review January/February 2009
Lifeline for Renewable Power
Without a radically expanded and smarter electrical grid, wind and solar will remain niche power sources.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology