Rust-based solar panels could make hydrogen cheap and efficient.
Researchers in Switzerland have demonstrated more-efficient water-splitting solar cells based on a cheap, abundant, and long-lasting material: rust. The advance could lead to a cheap and energy-efficient way to generate hydrogen for fuel-cell vehicles using solar energy.
Water-splitting solar panels would have important advantages over existing technologies in terms of hydrogen production. Right now, the primary way to make hydrogen is to separate it from natural gas, a process that generates carbon dioxide and undercuts the main motivation for moving to hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles: ending dependence on fossil fuels. The current alternative is electrolysis, which uses electricity to break water into hydrogen and oxygen, with the two gases forming at opposite electrodes. Although electrolysis is costly, it can be cleaner if the source of the electricity is wind, sun, or some other carbon-free source.
But if the source of the electricity is the sun, it would be much more efficient to use solar energy to produce hydrogen by a photochemical process inside the cell itself. By improving the efficiency of such solar panels, Michael Grätzel, chemistry professor at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, in Switzerland, and his colleagues have taken an important step toward this goal.
The researchers have shown that by including small amounts of silicon and cobalt, they can grow nanostructured thin films of iron oxide that convert sunlight into the electrons needed to form hydrogen from water. And the iron oxide films do this more efficiently than ever before with this material.
Iron oxide has long been an appealing material for such solar panels, in part because it holds up well in contact with water. But although it can absorb sunlight, the resulting charge carriers could not easily escape the material, so they recombined, canceling each other out before they could split any water. By doping the rust with silicon, the researchers coaxed the material to form cauliflower-like structures with extremely high surface area, ensuring that a large part of the atoms in the material were in contact with the water, or very close to it. That way, holes could easily escape into the water, where they prompt the generation of oxygen gas. The silicon also improves electron conductivity in the material, which is important for generating hydrogen gas at an opposite electrode. The researchers further improved the process by adding cobalt, which acts as a catalyst for the reactions.
What is the point of pursuing a device to facilitate hydrogen production only, when to achieve the same result one could simply attach a traditional solar cell to a traditional electrolysis cell.Wouldn't this be more practical and efficient? The electricity is the important part is it not?This is an interesting concept;however,
why not devote this human energy into increasing the efficiency and implementation of PV cells and skip the sidetracking?
This is such a fascinating technology with exciting potential. Thank you for the excellent question. Here's my thoughts on your question:
It's simply more energy efficient to convert sunlight directly to hydrogen. PV is, at best, 30% efficient, multiplied by the 10% efficiency of the Swiss process and you get about a total of 3% energy efficiency. By energy efficiency, I believe what's meant is for a given amount of sunlight energy striking the surface of either the PV cell or the photoelectric hydrogen electrode, only 10% (in the case of the Swiss photoelectrode) is converted to an equivalent amount of hydrogen.
(I am a Ph.D. researcher in the field of Materials Chemistry and Process Development with an abiding interest in photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation. I have worked on organo-metallic doped titania films as electrode materials for photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation. Clearly, the Swiss technology is a real breakthrough especially in terms of electrode stability and energy conversion efficiency. I'm looking forward to reading about more breakthroughs in these areas).
The issue here is end-to-end energy budget. There are energy requirements for the manufacture of both solar electrolytic and ferric oxide systems and there are also efficiency issues related to the operation of the product. This concept is very interesting and shows enough promise that it should be studied further. I would like to see a determination of the overall energy cost for manufacture and operation including periodic servicing for both approaches. What is the cost in watt hours and dollars per watt of final product? That would be an interesting comparison.
To answer your question with a question, how is increasing the conversion efficiency of solar energy to hydrogen while eliminating a step (converting first to electricity to use in the electrolysis of water, two very inefficient processes) sidetracking anything?
As well as the energy efficiency gains to be had by removing the interim step, to me the great advantage is that the process converts non-storable solar energy into energy that can be stored in definitely and used at a later date i.e. after dark.
The second great advantage of this approach is that potentially each household could generate and store its own power needs locally. If coupled with a fuel cell vehicle the household would become completely energy independent.
Does anyone know of any companies or universities that might be attempting to prove such an approach could work?
This looks very interesting for mother earth.. How far we from having a bulk solution for Hydrogen genration
Chandra, try these links to get a feel for that:
http://www.thegreencarwebsite.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/06/21/scientists-make-new-hydrogen-generation-breakthrough-2/
http://podcasts.aaas.org/science_podcast/SciencePodcast_080801.mp3
http://www.hydrogencarsnow.com/blog2/index.php/hydrogen-fuel-production/compressed-gridshift-hydrogen-fuel-at-2-51-per-gallon-breakthrough/
http://www.asemblon.com/energy/hydrnol-intro
http://www.physorg.com/news384.html
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
On Twitter
Become a Fan on Facebook
Subscribe to the Feed
clauder357
1 Comment
What "holes" are we talking about?
That way, holes could easily escape into the water, where they prompt the generation of oxygen gas.
sorry I did not undersatnd , here.
Reply
ralf
1 Comment
Re: What
A hole is the shortage of an electron.
When the electons move from left to right, a "hole" (absence of an electron) moves from right to left. When water splits and the oxigen atoms combine, electons move into the wire to fill up the "hole". It is as if "holes" move into the water. The H atoms combine with H2O to form 2 H3O+, which travel to the other end of the wire where they pick up electons and form water and H2 molecules.
Reply