The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
(Page 2 of 2)
In the face of this complexity, many have decided to focus their research efforts on cutting the cost of traditional "flat-plate" systems. This is done through making them thinner, to decrease the amount of semiconductor needed, or through turning to cheaper, though less efficient, organic materials. But now several companies claim to have developed reliable systems that can be manufactured on a large scale. For example, SolFocus is making a system that combines the concentrators and cells in one sealed package by employing manufacturing techniques similar to those used to make automobile headlamps. This way they can easily be created in large quantities, according to the company's CEO, Gary Conley.
As for the use of superefficient solar cells, critics originally said that although the cells worked well in the lab, it would be unlikely that their high efficiencies could be maintained in large-scale manufacturing. Unlike conventional solar cells, which use only one type of semiconductor (silicon), these more efficient cells, called multijunction cells, are made from layers of three types of semiconductor. This approach is meant to overcome a major limitation of silicon: although it can absorb photons from most of the spectrum in sunlight, it does so inefficiently, converting into heat, rather than into electricity, most of the energy in high-energy photons from the blue and ultraviolet parts of the spectrum. The multijunction cells use three materials designed to efficiently convert light from different parts of the spectrum, the result being that much less is converted into heat and much more into electricity.
All of the materials must be carefully engineered to work with the other materials, and they have to be assembled under very clean, well-controlled conditions. So in the 1990s, when this type of cell was still experimental, people called it "a laboratory curiosity that could never be manufactured in large volume," Olson says. "Now Spectrolab on their production floor does better than we do in the lab. So it basically blew that myth out of the water."
Other factors that have limited the use of concentrated solar, such as aesthetic objections to mounting concentrator systems on suburban rooftops, may largely restrict applications to commercial buildings or arrays in the desert.
But the advances that have come about, along with growing demand for solar and a shortage of silicon feedstock, have made concentrated solar photovoltaics attractive.
"There's a lot of uncertainty in this area, where historically there's been a lot of hype that just hasn't been delivered," Rogol says. "The biggest news for me is that serious solar people, over the course of the last year, have made notable commitments to concentrators."
Capturing the heat would increase the overall efficiency.
For a large, industrial scale plant it would not be of much use, but on a commerical or residential building it could heat potable water or be used for HVAC.
But I like this even as is.
Re: capture the heat, too?: Stirling engine
The heat from a large scale plant could be used to run a Stirling engine.
Re: capture the heat, too?: Stirling engine
I have seen demonstrations of stirling engine working directly from Fresnel lense focusing onto cylinder in full sunlight . How can stirling engine be harnessed in practice to actually generate electricity and how is this stored.
Guest (SCOTT)
See power-spar.com for CSP system which generates both electrical and thermal energy. For commercial flat roofs.
Heat capture is another way of saying that you are cooling the cells with the possible result that you can further increase the amount of sunlight focused onto the photo-cell. This synergy might be considerable. I don't know, but I strongly suspect that heat tolerance is the major limiting factor!
wonder how long it will take for a system to
appear that could say, on 15 sunny days / month in summer generate 1000 kw * hours of power.
of course for a price that will yeild returns in years not decades.
We can use this in the african and asian regions where the sunlight is plenty for most part of the year.
Too bad solar is still in the dark ages
There is new tech on the horizon called full-spectrum solar cells using quantum micro-dotting. I suggest using the concentrators with this new tech to see what happens. There are other factors to consider too as well when it comes to solar. Pollution, Degrading solar panels, poor locations, diffusion, pay-back, and weather all play a roll in the choices we make about solar power. I suggest they try to address all of these at once not just parts so solar can make giant leaps.
D~W
Re: Too bad solar is still in the dark ages
It's not really in the dark ages:
http://pointfocus.com
http://www.stirlingenergy.com
What's available is simply not public knowledge yet.
Modulating the frequency range in much the same fashion that SDR technology uses a tunable radio requency cavity? Whichever way you want to slice and dice it, letting all that free energy from the sun go to waste without tapping into it.
Yeah, think of how that wasted energy could be used once solar energy becomes efficient enough. I sites for scrubbing CO2 from the atmosphere would be worth-while. I know plants are already good at that, but I've read about some of the things that can be done with stock-piled CO2 and other air pollutants and making those processes cost-efficient would open up a wonderful new realm of possibilities. I'm thinking about passive and active tech, all powered by solar, and not just the PV method. We would essentially be doing something the earth already does at a rate and scale more closely countering the negative impact that humanity has here.
need help in desigining a solar cell based battery charging mechanism which shall track the suns movement 2.... anybody has done this b4.... if so ur blue print would b appreciated... this is a fun project undertaken for helping people in rural india...
I can be of help... Let me know ur contact details and what is the problem like...Write to me at john_thermax@yahoo.com.. I could offer some consultancy help here...
TATA BP Solar is making solar cells in India.
Well I am not a big techie but I have a probable solution. Use solar cells to track the sun. Fix small solar cells at various angles. Each of their angle with the sun they will produce some voltage. Feed these into a circuit which will then trace the voltage difference between each cell and using a motor place the solar panel in the most efficient direction ie the direction of the cell producing highest voltage.
Another cheap and premitive suntracking system that i can think of is a pot with a tap and a bucket. one needs to adjust the speed of the tap so that it water drops into the bucket and the weight of the bucket rotates the solar panel :). This involves manual effort every day to empty the bucket and adjust the speed of water as per season but could be made at almost no cost.
Solar Cells using Concentrators
My father, Dr. John C. Evans, Jr., was a Research Scientist working at NASA Lewis Rresearch Center (now known as NASA Glenn Center) in Brookpark, Ohio in the '70s and '80s. At the time he obtained several patents for high power solar cell inventions. Among these are: Heat Transparent High Intensity High Efficiency Solar Cell, High Voltage Planar Multijunction Solar Cell, Solar Cell System Having Alternating Current Output, High Voltage V-Groove Solar Cell, etc. As I read the news article I saw that many of the "new" activities such as using mirrors, fresnel lens, transparent solar cells, etc. are what he had already patented over 20 years ago. Please take a look at US patents US4360701, US4341918, and US4217633.
For a listing and description of 11 of his patents dealing with high power solar cells, please see the NASA Glenn Center site - Solar Cell Patents: <http://timeline.grc.nasa.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=GENSEARCH.results&keywords=John+C.+Evans&x=24&y=12>
I would very much like to see that my father, Dr. John C. Evans receives the recognition that he deserves for being a pioneer in the field of High Energy Solar Cells. Best regards, Karyn Tegtmeier
Re: Solar Cells using Concentrators
did the patents on concentrators get processed or are they shelved.
Re: Solar Cells using Concentrators
The patents were his. The government also had rights to use them for free. But, they were his. He had a company called US Photovoltaics in San Diego, California. He died in 1993. We have done nothing with them since. It would be nice if he could get some name recognition somewhere for being the solar cell pioneer that he was. He was a brilliant man, and now sadly seems to have been forgotten.
Concentrators available - from AUS
Green and Gold Energy has been making these for some time, available for homes in Australia. Ran across them last year: http://www.greenandgoldenergy.com.au/
There is nothing new to this idea and in fact it was tested and characterized in a variety of configurations by the Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM in the late 1970s. Good researchers normally review what has been done in the past. Too bad we continue to reinvent the wheel; every generation.
Are there resources available where we (the upcoming gerenation of engineers) can find this info, perhaps in a textbook writen by those of you with these experiences? Or do we need to search academic journal archives to avoid reinventing the wheel? Is there a central location for info and past research in PV?
-Nathan
Electrical Engineering Student
A great place to start is the US Patent and trademark website.
uspto.gov
At some point you just have to get the best of the currently available products and build a system. That's what I did, and it has helped me through some grid power outages, and is reducing my carbon footprint. http://solarjohn.blogspot.com
John
I am a lay person. I see silicon and glass fiber optic cable/wiring being layed across much of southern california. I see much unused desert land. Lots of surplus government owned land. There is so much sunshine here. Could the solar energy be converted to use the already layed fiber (be better so if larger cable was layed), or aerial drop fiber lines to bring solar energy into households since fiber is silicon too? Should'nt we be laying it once? Right the first time so to say. I know it is a huge expense to lay. It looks to me as the fiber gets layed, it is a narrow view of what it could be used for. What type of lines would support bringing solar energy into each household? Does it necessarily have to be based at each individual home?
Solution for concentrating solar
There is a company Sol Solution www.sol-solution.com that uses a Fresnel lens to separate and concentrate the sunlight. Instead of using a vertically stacked triple junction cell they use 3 horizontal cells and get much better efficiency and better heat characteristics.
Re: Solution for concentrating solar
I thought you might be interested in this patent regarding fresnel lens and a method to substantially reduce heat issues. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=4,360,701.PN.&OS=PN/4,360,701&RS=PN/4,360,701
this was my father's patent. He passed away in 1993. There are many good ideas in it. Best regards,
Karyn Tegtmeier
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
gfschue
2 Comments
Solar Concentrators
At first glance I didn't see the point--the solar flux is fixed: concentrating it doesn't increase it so why should the (area/Gigawatt electrical power) ratio drop? But then I remembered my previous work with a-Si PIN cells. Concentrators enable you to decrease the size of the active solar cell. For the solar cell manufacturing processes I've seen, the probability of defects in thin film deposition scales up with area, defects that always lower efficiencies. Decreasing the size of the solar cell will, generally, allow you to reach higher efficiencies on average in a commerical process. If concentrator area is small enough, then you still have enough solar cell area (operating at higher efficiency) to generate your target electrical power. Ich verstehe, ich verstehe!
Reply
zeddy
5 Comments
Re: Solar Concentrators
Note that solar PV cells are more efficient at higher flux densities. Ie if you compared the output of a 1 sqm PV flat panel to a 1 sqm concentrator with a small PV cell, the concentrator would have about twice the output.
http://www.earthscan.co.uk/news/article/mps/UAN/486/v/3/sp/332958698966342800322
Up to 39% efficiency is currently quoted, which is starting to become viable if it can be cheaply and reliably mass produced. Compare this with the efficiency of an (average) coal-fired power station: http://www.aie.org.au/melb/material/resource/pwr-eff.htm
While multi-junction cells have greater coverage of the sunlight/IR spectrum, there are possibilities for shifting the wavelengths using special materials: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-10/m-abf101306.php
Reply