Solar Cells for CheapNot everyone gets a solar cell named after them: but Michael Gratzel did. He says his novel technology, which promises electricity-generating windows and low manufacturing costs, is ready for the market.
Michael Grätzel, chemistry professor at the Ecoles Polytechniques Fédérales de Lausanne in Switzerland, is most famous for inventing a new type of solar cell that could cost much less than conventional photovoltaics. Now, 15 years after the first prototypes, what he calls the dye-sensitized cell (and everyone else calls the Grätzel cell) is in limited production by Konarka, a company based in Lowell, MA, and will soon be more widely available. Grätzel is now working on taking advantage of the ability of nanocrystals to dramatically increase the efficiency of solar cells. Technology Review asked him about the challenges to making cheap solar cells, and why new technologies like his, which take much less energy to manufacture than conventional solar cells, are so important. Technology Review: Why has it been so difficult to make efficient, yet inexpensive solar cells that could compete with fossil fuels as sources of electricity? Michael Grätzel: It's perhaps just the way things evolved. Silicon cells were first made for [outer] space, and there was a lot of money available so the technology that was first developed was an expensive technology. The cell we have been developing on the other hand is closer to photosynthesis. TR: What is its similarity to photosynthesis? MG: That has to do with the absorption of light. Light generates electrons and positive carriers and they have to be transported. In a semiconductor silicon cell, silicon material absorbs light, but it also conducts the negative and positive charge carriers. An electric field has to be there to separate those charges. All of this has to be done by one material--silicon has to perform at least three functions. To do that, you need very pure materials, and that brings the price up. On the other hand, the dye cell uses a molecule to absorb light. It's like chlorophyll in photosynthesis, a molecule that absorbs light. But the chlorophyll's not involved in charge transport. It just absorbs light and generates a charge, and then those charges are conducted by some well-established mechanisms. That's exactly what our system does. The real breakthrough came with the nanoscopic particles. You have hundreds of particles stacked on top of each other in our light harvesting system. TR: So we have a stack of nanosized particles... MG: ...covered with dye. TR: The dye absorbs the light, and the electron is transferred to the nanoparticles? MG: Yes. TR: The image of solar cells is changing. They used to be ugly boxes added to roofs as an afterthought. But now we are starting to see more attractive packaging, and even solar shingles (see "Beyond the Solar Panel"). Will dye-sensitized cells contribute to this evolution? MG: Actually, that's one of our main advantages. It's a commonly accepted fact that the photovoltaic community thinks that the "building integrated" photovoltaics, that's where we have to go. Putting, as you say, those "ugly" scaffolds on the roof--this is not going to be appealing, and it's also expensive. That support structure costs a lot of money in addition to the cells, and so it's absolutely essential to make cells that are an integral part. [With our cells] the normal configuration has glass on both sides, and can be made to look like a colored glass. This could be used as a power-producing window or skylights or building facades. The wall or window itself is photovoltaicly active.
|
Shade Power
08/18/2009









Comments
janakiblum
09/12/2006
Posts:3
lund1967
09/12/2006
Posts:6
dbreneman
09/12/2006
Posts:2
gabrielg01
09/12/2006
Posts:396
Its great when the neighbors come over and ask why we have the only house for miles around that has lights (I turn on all the lights and light up the house up like a power plant) My average outage time is four hours - in the middle of town!
morris
09/14/2006
Posts:1
"What does the government have to do with this?"
I find it hard to believe anyone in the renewable energy field or sustaianable design field would ask such a naive question.
Government, especially United States government, has it's hands on the wheel...and has for at least the last 120 years...ever since the industrial revolution, really.
So if we REALLY want this technology to be a success, we must VOTE with our DOLLARS. We must support the supply/demand cycle while simultaneously VOTE to get the right people in office and KEEP THEM THERE. It's really a very complex issue.
We know it's not as simple as providing a breakthru technology...it's not as simple as voting the right member of Congress to office...it's not living in the right State with the right incentives...it's not teaching our children that fossil fuel consumption is ANTIQUATED and BAD....it's all those together and more.
I for one applaud this new NANOTECH solar...it sounds good on paper....I hope it makes it thru the gauntlet that is "Modern America"
thegreenbuil...
10/21/2006
Posts:1
markdumond
09/12/2006
Posts:1
randman420
10/02/2006
Posts:6