Energy

Solar Cells for Cheap

Not everyone gets a solar cell named after them: but Michael Gratzel did. He says his novel technology, which promises electricity-generating windows and low manufacturing costs, is ready for the market.

  • Tuesday, September 12, 2006
  • By Kevin Bullis

Michael Grätzel, chemistry professor at the Ecoles Polytechniques Fédérales de Lausanne in Switzerland, is most famous for inventing a new type of solar cell that could cost much less than conventional photovoltaics. Now, 15 years after the first prototypes, what he calls the dye-sensitized cell (and everyone else calls the Grätzel cell) is in limited production by Konarka, a company based in Lowell, MA, and will soon be more widely available.

Grätzel is now working on taking advantage of the ability of nanocrystals to dramatically increase the efficiency of solar cells.

Advertisement

Technology Review asked him about the challenges to making cheap solar cells, and why new technologies like his, which take much less energy to manufacture than conventional solar cells, are so important.

Technology Review: Why has it been so difficult to make efficient, yet inexpensive solar cells that could compete with fossil fuels as sources of electricity?

Michael Grätzel: It's perhaps just the way things evolved. Silicon cells were first made for [outer] space, and there was a lot of money available so the technology that was first developed was an expensive technology. The cell we have been developing on the other hand is closer to photosynthesis.

TR: What is its similarity to photosynthesis?

MG: That has to do with the absorption of light. Light generates electrons and positive carriers and they have to be transported. In a semiconductor silicon cell, silicon material absorbs light, but it also conducts the negative and positive charge carriers. An electric field has to be there to separate those charges. All of this has to be done by one material--silicon has to perform at least three functions. To do that, you need very pure materials, and that brings the price up.

On the other hand, the dye cell uses a molecule to absorb light. It's like chlorophyll in photosynthesis, a molecule that absorbs light. But the chlorophyll's not involved in charge transport. It just absorbs light and generates a charge, and then those charges are conducted by some well-established mechanisms. That's exactly what our system does.

The real breakthrough came with the nanoscopic particles. You have hundreds of particles stacked on top of each other in our light harvesting system.

TR: So we have a stack of nanosized particles...

MG: ...covered with dye.

TR: The dye absorbs the light, and the electron is transferred to the nanoparticles?

MG: Yes.

TR: The image of solar cells is changing. They used to be ugly boxes added to roofs as an afterthought. But now we are starting to see more attractive packaging, and even solar shingles (see "Beyond the Solar Panel"). Will dye-sensitized cells contribute to this evolution?

MG: Actually, that's one of our main advantages. It's a commonly accepted fact that the photovoltaic community thinks that the "building integrated" photovoltaics, that's where we have to go. Putting, as you say, those "ugly" scaffolds on the roof--this is not going to be appealing, and it's also expensive. That support structure costs a lot of money in addition to the cells, and so it's absolutely essential to make cells that are an integral part.

[With our cells] the normal configuration has glass on both sides, and can be made to look like a colored glass. This could be used as a power-producing window or skylights or building facades. The wall or window itself is photovoltaicly active.

Print

Related Articles

Cheap, Durable Nonsilicon Solar Cells

An advanced dye boosts the efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells.

Better Plastic Solar Cells

Improved dyes and electrolytes could make the Grätzel solar-cell design more practical.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

janakiblum

3 Comments

  • 1980 Days Ago
  • 09/12/2006

Nice, but will it really make a difference?

The advances in solar energy are exhilarating for the rest of us, but I wonder if the present political administration in the USA would take notice, now that oil companies have allegedly found new oil fields offshore near New Orleans.

Reply

lund1967

8 Comments

  • 1980 Days Ago
  • 09/12/2006

Re: Nice, but will it really make a difference?

What does the government have to do with this?  It sounds like making cheap solar cells would make it easier for businesses, both big and small, to be able to cut costs by using solar power.

Reply

dbreneman

2 Comments

  • 1980 Days Ago
  • 09/12/2006

Re: Nice, but will it really make a difference?

I guess people are so used to seeing alternative energy sources as costly and inefficient that they just reflexively assume that such energy systems must be forced on the people by the government. :-)

Reply

morris

1 Comment

  • 1978 Days Ago
  • 09/14/2006

Re: Nice, but will it really make a difference?

Actually most of us get started with PV as a two part process. The first step is putting the receptacle/lighting house circuits on a battery/inverter/battery charger system. This is done so that when the utility power goes away (either by storm, car hitting a pole, utility overload, etc.) you keep your lights, TV, fans (in the summer) all up and working. Second step is: as the cost of PV comes down, you start to add panels. (OK, so you jump the gun like I did and put the panels on at $5/watt) but they need to be around $1/watt to be cost effective without any incentives which is where we should have been a long time ago. (Boy do I have stories to tell about DOE - getting all us high-brows laid-off).

Its great when the neighbors come over and ask why we have the only house for miles around that has lights (I turn on all the lights and light up the house up like a power plant) My average outage time is four hours - in the middle of town!

Reply

thegreenbuilder

1 Comment

  • 1941 Days Ago
  • 10/21/2006

Re: Nice, but will it really make a difference?

Are you serious????

"What does the government have to do with this?"

I find it hard to believe anyone in the renewable energy field or sustaianable design field would ask such a naive question.

Government, especially United States government, has it's hands on the wheel...and has for at least the last 120 years...ever since the industrial revolution, really.

So if we REALLY want this technology to be a success, we must VOTE with our DOLLARS.  We must support the supply/demand cycle while simultaneously VOTE to get the right people in office and KEEP THEM THERE.  It's really a very complex issue.

We know it's not as simple as providing a breakthru technology...it's not as simple as voting the right member of Congress to office...it's not living in the right State with the right incentives...it's not teaching our children that fossil fuel consumption is ANTIQUATED and BAD....it's all those together and more.

I for one applaud this new NANOTECH solar...it sounds good on paper....I hope it makes it thru the gauntlet that is "Modern America"

Reply

markdumond

1 Comment

  • 1980 Days Ago
  • 09/12/2006

Way to go

This is great news! I'm totally solar today with a 4.1kw system. The cost was large but worth it. Hopefully this will bring the cost down significantly. I've got plenty of room if they need someone to try the product in a real life setting!

Reply

randman420

6 Comments

  • 1960 Days Ago
  • 10/02/2006

Re: Way to go

I am in total agreement with you. I think solar is making leaps and bounds (that sound kind of funny when I write it)but I think the advances are fantastic and just in time. Global Warming is really scary, especially when it comes to my kids!

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

ARM Holdings

Siemens

Groupon

Akamai

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement