Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
« Back 1 [2]

Friday, August 25, 2006

Safer Lithium-Ion Batteries

Continued from page 1

By Kevin Bullis

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The downside of batteries using the new material is that they have less energy capacity than those typically used in laptops today. A123's batteries, for instance, have been engineered for applications in which safety and quick bursts of power are more important, such as for power tools. This power comes partly from the nature of the material; however, making the electrodes thin also helps. So engineering batteries with thicker electrodes can increase capacity.

Although safer lithium-ion batteries could be adapted for mobile devices, a re-engineered battery would still have less runtime than users now expect in their laptops and cell phones. The lower capacity, however, can be offset, to some extent, especially in cell phones, by faster charging times made possible by the new chemistry, says A123 founder and VP of business development Ric Fulop. Although the battery would be exhausted faster, it could be recharged during a break in a meeting or at a layover in an airport. Fulop says their batteries also maintain capacity over more charge/discharge cycles, extending their useful life.

Currently, A123 is focused on power tool and hybrid vehicle markets, where high power is essential. But Valence, whose batteries run the Segway personal transport vehicle, has been talking to laptop manufacturers about adapting laptops to use their batteries, says vice president of marketing Dean Bogues. So far, however, computer makers haven't taken the bait. "The hurdle they've had is, who's going to be the first to give up energy capacity to go with a safer technology?"

With the recent headline news of massive recalls and continuing worries over the safety of more traditional lithium-ion batteries, though, some may begin to change their thinking.

« Back 1 [2]

Comments

  • Airline Security
    joseparc on 08/25/2006 at 3:16 PM
    Posts:
    3
    After reading the article and watching the Valence video, I asked myself if I was going to feel safer the next time I got on an airplane knowing the guy on my left had to throw away his shampoo and toothpaste before he boarded but seeing the guy on my right still using his Dell laptop.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Market leaders Dell and Apple should collude in Safety!
    briang1621 on 08/25/2006 at 8:15 PM
    Posts:
    45
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
         Business collusion is illegal in the U.S., but safety collusion is not! Amazingly, the words “Lithium Ion” has a brand value to the public, but two of its larger computer distributors failed to catch the dysfunctional batteries which they placed in the open market.
            Together they have lowered the brand value of this still emerging product component, and likely hurt the other products brand value which dependent upon this component, like cell phones and other laptops. This can be seen in Qantas airline’s band of ALL Dell and Mac batteries in-flight use along with the massive recall of Apple’s Laptop batteries.
           But since neither of them exclusively owns the name “Lithium-Ion” why should they care?
    Collusion for safety standard is almost necessary for possibly dangerous emerging component or product categories, because as I put it “any one player in the game can kick the ball out of the field for everyone, and end the game.” 
    The brand name of “Lithium-Ion” is tarnished and it will take several months for the publics confident in this new component to come back. The lesson here is that for possibly dangerous emerging high tech components, safety infractions can hurt every company using that component, and that safety collusion for standard is the better than having someone else’s mistake affect your product.
    Ideally this can be done by enforcing safety testing to place a safety standard trademark on your component. Also, I see this as being a necessity in emerging markets like Robotics.
    Then again, “When the going gets hot, the hot ones logoff!”
    Brian Glassman
    http://www.smh.com.au/news/biztech/safety-first-for-carryon-dells/2006/08/23/1156012601607.html
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Ironically
    roba on 08/27/2006 at 10:35 PM
    Posts:
    1
    The "solution" "found" by Chiang et al. was first brought to light by, I hate to tell you, the reseachers in Sony.  Olivines was suggested by Goodenough years ago but the first practical cell was made in Sony (yes the company which made explosive batteries) and published in 2001.  Thereafter did Chiang and gangs come to the scene,
    just to set the record straight.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • laptop battery
    GreenApple123 on 08/31/2006 at 3:02 PM
    Posts:
    3
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
    i bought a laptop battery from http://www.laptopsforless.com/laptopbattery because mine woldn't even hold a charge anymore.  are replacement batteries, like the one i bought, safer or less safe than those produced by the major manufacturers?
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Safer Lithium-Ion Batteries
    batterygirl on 12/05/2006 at 1:19 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
    if you want more knowledge about lithium ion battery,you can visit:http://www.lithium-batteries.net
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Actual, Lithium-ion battery isn't very terrible.
    AlenJane on 05/09/2008 at 12:31 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
    Lithium-Ion batteries are longer lived than conventional batteries and do not require replacement as often. Commonly, it has internal circuit board with chips that allow it to communicate with the notebook to monitor battery performance, output voltage and temperature. It also gives the notebook much more accurate 'fuel gauge' capability to determine how much battery runtime is left before the next recharge is required. Actually, all the battery distributors know the importance of overcharge protection and overheat switch, so the issued lithium-ion batteries can be safely used.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Avoid danger
    toshiba on 07/13/2008 at 10:42 PM
    Posts:
    1
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
    What are the reasons that cause battery with no voltage or low voltage?

    No voltage.
    External shot circuit or overcharge, anti-charge
    Cells expansion and short circuit caused by direct anode contact and continuous high efficiency electric current overcharging.
    It can be avoided by:

    Checking if the battery is without voltage or electric current
    Avoiding short circuit
    Avoiding collision and pressure among batteries
    Charging the battery after it automatically powers off, then full charge the battery.
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology