Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement
« Back 1 [2]

Monday, August 14, 2006

Turning Slash into Cash

Continued from page 1

By Tyler Hamilton

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

To make the process more energy efficient, the steel shot is circulated using augers instead of more energy-intensive compressed-air blowers. The charcoal and gases produced are captured from the hot vapors and recycled as fuel for powering the system and pre-drying the slash, which can contain up to 50 percent water.

"Fransham's company came into it quite early, and they're one of the first to be talking about it and to actually start building this kind of machine," says David Layzell, an expert on bioenergy and plant sciences at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario.

Layzell, who also serves as CEO and research director for biomass think-tank BIOCAP Canada Foundation, says Fransham's early work is beginning to inspire others in the field. "Competition between these groups all trying to make it work is exactly what we need," he says.

The technology has also captured the interest of the Ontario government. Two years ago, the province's Minister of Natural Resources took a routine flight over northern Ontario and was shocked to see plumes of smoke emerging from clusters of forest slash being burned by the roadside. "He thought it was a shame that it's all going up in the air," says Larry Skinkle, biomass coordinator for the forest section of the ministry. After investigating a number of technologies, the ministry contacted Fransham and asked him to build a prototype for the province.

Skinkle says the government, recognizing that the technology could unlock a new revenue stream for a struggling forest industry, while at the same time achieving environmental goals, hopes that a demonstration plant will spur industry-wide testing of the system.

"It's been built," he says. "The next step is to transport it into the bush to demonstrate the full transportability of it."

The modular design makes it easy to transport. Maintenance and repairs are less disruptive, too. "If one of the modules is damaged because of a forklift running into it, we could take that module out, put in a replacement, and be back up and running in no time," says Fransham, adding that upgrades can be made to individual modules without knocking the entire plant out of service.

Fransham estimates that with 2,000 of his machines installed across Ontario, enough "green" oil could be produced every day to supply electrical energy to two million homes. But the market opportunities extend across the United States and Canada, of course, as well as to forestry operations in China and India, where distributed fuel production and energy generation could be a perfect match for remote communities.

To tap the U.S. market, Advanced Biorefinery shares its intellectual property with Florence, AL-based Renewable Oil International, which is attempting to establish its own demonstration plant in Massachusetts.

"Canada's not a big enough market for these guys to go after," says Sustainable Development's Whittaker. "So we encourage them, after they've proven it, to really expand globally." Like the trend in distributed energy generation, Whittaker believes the concept of distributed biofuel production has similar potential. "It makes a lot of economic sense to do."

Queen's Layzell says the best part about converting biomass waste, whether forest slash or crop residue, into bio oil or ethanol is that you get far more energy out than you put in. If growing corn to make ethanol produces only 1.5 times the energy return, he estimates that using forest waste offers at least a fourfold return.

"As companies like Advanced Biorefinery and others start to implement these technologies, there are going to be energy-efficiency improvements and other gains," says Layzell. "If you can get four [times the energy return] now, you might be able to get six in 15 years. There's an opportunity to prove it, but we're really in the early stages."

« Back 1 [2]

Comments

  • How efficient is the process?
    Guest (Chris Miller) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    How many gallons of bio-fuel can be produced by burning a gallon of oil?  (I assume this is an oil-fired heating process.)
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • [no subject]
      Guest (Vince) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      I think they said thry use the charcoal and volitile gases to fuel the plant itself.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Efficiency
      Guest (Nick) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      The article says it generates 4 times the enrgy it consumes -- with 6 times possible as the process is refined. Whether they take into account the gas for the trucks and machinery that transport the waste and machines... it doesn't say.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: Efficiency
        techfinder on 07/08/2007 at 6:10 AM
        Posts:
        2
        Avg Rating:
        5/5
        What is the basis of the claim that it generates 4 times energy than it consumes? Has it been certified by some accrediteded agency?
        Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: How efficient is the process?
      budbishop on 09/05/2006 at 10:34 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Western America has an almost endless amount of woody material that could lend itself to this purpose.  For example, where I live there is a increasing infestation of Western Juniper that concerns those who use the range resources of our area.  Could this process, "Turning Slash to Cash" be economic for the treatment of Juniper?  In addition, our forests to the south and east are jungles of woody material, prone to fire each year, shouldn't this be a suitable source for raw material needs?
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: How efficient is the process?
        sheppner on 09/28/2006 at 6:19 PM
        Posts:
        1
        There are over a hundred villages in Alaska on diesel generators.  These villages are surronded by 1000's of acres of black spruce.  Could the black spruce be turn into Bio fuel and be competitvie with diesel at $5.00/gal using this process? 
        Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: How efficient is the process?
      techfinder on 07/08/2007 at 6:06 AM
      Posts:
      2
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      Unless the plant is installed and demonstrated, one will not know the efficiency etc.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Slash to Cash - what about non foresting waste
    Guest (Mike) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Can this widget be used in cornfields or other farms to process waste from agricultural activities, then collect the bio oils and other components and ship them to a refinery for further processing?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Could reduce pollution fr seasonal burning of plantations in S.E. Asia
      Guest (TSL) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Maybe this could be part of the solution to a huge problem in Indonesia where many plantation owners slash & burn old growth to replant every season.  It's causing massive smog problems to neighboring countries, e.g. Malaysia & Singapore. 
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Strip-mining our soils
    Guest (Leigh) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Although we use terms like waste and slash to refer to the organic matter left behind logging and agricultural operations, it is very short-sighted to think that it is efficient to take every last bit of biomass and turn it into fuel. The messy stuff left lying around after logging operations rots and replenishes the forest soil. Soil is depleted if you keep removing everything that's growing on it without putting organic matter back in. Why were they burning the slash in the first place? Bio-fuel is a good option in some circumstances, but it is a mistake to pursue it as  a large scale solution to our energy future. 
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Strip-mining our soils
      Guest (Paul712) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
        You missed one VERY important point, the first prototype was developed when the Canadian Interior minister saw that the forest slash was being burned in roadside bonfires.  Instead of wastefully burning this slash and releasing all green house gases it is being transformed into something much more beneficial.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • too much waste depletes the soil.
        Guest (Brian Wilkie) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
        Posts:
        1
        I know that with agricultural waste, it takes so much nitrogen to decompose cellulose, that the soil is actually depleted by the process. that's what makes the production of ethanol from corn/grain waste (stalks) good news for farmers. reduces the amount of high nitrogen fertilizer needed.
        Rate this comment: 12345
    • [no subject]
      Guest (Jay) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      I think the rule-of-thumb for these operations is to leave 25 per cent behind as nutrients for soil.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Do only if it is as good as large-scale plants
      Guest (CKE) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      The forest needs its organic compost base for fertility. Unless creating biofuel onsite in a small plant and in small batches is better than conventional feedstock methods at a central processing plant with its high efficiency & pollution controls, this looks like a waste.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • [no subject]
        Guest (RR) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
        Posts:
        1
        A lot of assumptions. The closer to the resource probably reduces the environmental footprint because of the resources used.
        Rate this comment: 12345
    • slash piles
      Guest (RD) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      So much debris is left after logging that it often interferes with the replanting of logged land.  A significant amount, but not all, of the debris is piled up to make replanting possible.  Trees will not grow where the slash piles sit.  With states like Washington initiating bans on slash burning, these piles reduce the productivity of forests.  Finding a use for the piles is a great leap forward.  I have 56 acres of slash I will volunteer as a start.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • "Slash" Processing Has Tradeoffs
      Guest (John Laumer) on 08/15/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Slash provides wildlife habitat, prevents soil from eroding after the over-story has been removed and soil surface torn by equipment.  It also provides humus. Loggers stack and burn it only because it nakes it hard for tree planting (monoculture creating) machines to do the next job.
      When I was a child I lived near a charcoal briquette making plant (a famous brand that starts with "K").  When a batch was processed and the cupulas on the roof open a horrid pungent acrid cloud of smoke and vapors contaminated the landscape for miles downwind.  It was truly repulsive.  Wood distillation creates a tar that is probably carcinogenic.  Someone will have to clean these machines from time to time, producing ghastly runoff and occupational exposures.  So lets not make out like this is a wonderful win win with no issues.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Soil Depletion
      Guest (Ron Wagner) on 08/16/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Good point, but commercial forests soils need to be treated like farm soils and replenished in a scientific manner.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • It's not strip-mining
      Julie on 08/23/2006 at 11:37 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Collecting slash from the forest doesn't have to be "strip-mining" it.  That is an option, definitely not a good one, but it's an option.  In reality, there are regulations and strong recommendations to forest practicioners that a certain percentage of coarse woody debris be left in the forest after forest operations in order to provide for ecological benefits such as nutrient cycling, soil productivity, water retention, protection for new seedlings, wildlife, etc.  What is left after that percentage is accounted for in the forest is generally disposed of by burning it in the forest--that's a waste of good energy.  Furthermore, too much debris left in the forest can have negative effects including fire hazards, hindering new forest growth, creating pest breeding sites, etc.   Adding forest "waste wood"/slash to our portfolio of fuel sources is a brilliant idea. 
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • efficency relative to enzyme digestion
    Guest (Tom H) on 08/16/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    I read recently about an altenative technology that used enzymes to break down the cellulose.  Anyone know hich would be the most effective?
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review January/February 2009
Lifeline for Renewable Power
Without a radically expanded and smarter electrical grid, wind and solar will remain niche power sources.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology