Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Monday, August 14, 2006

Turning Slash into Cash

A portable plant might make it economical to transform huge amounts of logging "waste" into energy -- right in the forest.

By Tyler Hamilton

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Advanced Biorefinery’s modular pyrolysis system is designed for use in the forest. The complete system also includes a reactor and a condenser, not shown here. (Credit: Adam Valenta)

A small company in Ottawa, Canada, says it has developed an economical way of turning North America's vast supply of forest waste, called "slash," into a carbon-neutral liquid for power generation and chemical production.

Its approach is built around a modular, quick-to-assemble pyrolysis plant that can follow logging companies into the bush and directly convert their leftover trimmings into a clean-burning renewable fuel.

The trimmings, also known as forest slash, are the unwanted branches, tops, stumps, and leaves that are removed during logging and typically burned in piles at the sides of roads.

It's a tremendous amount of wasted energy. In the United States alone, 16 percent of wood resulting from logging activities is slash, or 49 million tons in 2004, according to the U.S. Department of Energy.

The problem has been that forest slash is bulky, low-density material usually located in remote logging areas, says Peter Fransham, president of Advanced Biorefinery. This abundant, essentially free feedstock is too expensive to collect and transport, he says, particularly if the nearest refinery is more than 60 miles away.

"It doesn't take long before the cost of trucking exceeds the value of the biomass," says Fransham, who's also an engineer and research scientist. So Advanced Biorefinery flipped the problem on its head. "We take the machine to the biomass as opposed to the biomass to the machine," he says.

That machine is a transportable "dry distillation" plant capable of processing 55 dry tons of forest slash per day into a mixture that includes 60 percent bio oil and 40 percent charcoal, ash, and synthetic gas.

The green bio oil -- which contains no sulphur dioxide and half the nitrogen oxide of conventional oil -- can be burned in boilers, turbines, and diesel generators to produce heat and power. It also contains acetic acid, acetol, glyoxal, and formic acid, which can be used in a number of chemical markets, from foods to fertilizer.

And of course the transportation costs are dramatically lowered by processing the biomass on-site and converting it into high-density liquid, which packs a lot of energy in a fraction of the volume, says Fransham, who has been working on his system for 18 years.

"If you look at the value going down the highway, [the contents of] a wood-chip truck has a value of $1,000, whereas a tanker load of bio oil has a value of around $8,000."

A key innovation behind Advanced Biorefinery's plant is its modular and self-sufficient design. The system is composed of six modules, each roughly eight feet high, eight feet wide, and 20 feet long. They're easily transported by container truck and can be bolted together and operational within a week of arriving at a site.

"What they've got at the core works very elegantly," says Rick Whittaker, vice president of investments at Sustainable Development Technology Canada (SDTC), a not-for-profit foundation that provides early-stage funding for clean-technology companies.

SDTC announced in July that it would contribute financing toward a pilot project involving Advanced Biorefinery and a major forest operator in northern Ontario. "Now they've got to prove it works to the customer. They're ready to take it to a larger scale," says Whittaker.

The fast-pyrolysis process they use is familiar. The plant rapidly heats the biomass to 1,000 degrees F in an oxygen-starved environment, shattering its molecular structure and producing the oil, along with charcoal and gas.

Fransham says many pyrolysis plants, including those based on popular but complex fluid-bed designs, were difficult to scale up without sacrificing modularity. He decided to design a more flexible and simple system in which the biomass is almost instantly vaporized by hot steel shot, which transfers heat more efficiently than other approaches.

[1] 2 Next »

Comments

  • How efficient is the process?
    Guest (Chris Miller) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    How many gallons of bio-fuel can be produced by burning a gallon of oil?  (I assume this is an oil-fired heating process.)
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • [no subject]
      Guest (Vince) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      I think they said thry use the charcoal and volitile gases to fuel the plant itself.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Efficiency
      Guest (Nick) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      The article says it generates 4 times the enrgy it consumes -- with 6 times possible as the process is refined. Whether they take into account the gas for the trucks and machinery that transport the waste and machines... it doesn't say.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: Efficiency
        techfinder on 07/08/2007 at 6:10 AM
        Posts:
        2
        What is the basis of the claim that it generates 4 times energy than it consumes? Has it been certified by some accrediteded agency?
        Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: How efficient is the process?
      budbishop on 09/05/2006 at 10:34 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Western America has an almost endless amount of woody material that could lend itself to this purpose.  For example, where I live there is a increasing infestation of Western Juniper that concerns those who use the range resources of our area.  Could this process, "Turning Slash to Cash" be economic for the treatment of Juniper?  In addition, our forests to the south and east are jungles of woody material, prone to fire each year, shouldn't this be a suitable source for raw material needs?
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Re: How efficient is the process?
        sheppner on 09/28/2006 at 6:19 PM
        Posts:
        1
        There are over a hundred villages in Alaska on diesel generators.  These villages are surronded by 1000's of acres of black spruce.  Could the black spruce be turn into Bio fuel and be competitvie with diesel at $5.00/gal using this process? 
        Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: How efficient is the process?
      techfinder on 07/08/2007 at 6:06 AM
      Posts:
      2
      Unless the plant is installed and demonstrated, one will not know the efficiency etc.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Slash to Cash - what about non foresting waste
    Guest (Mike) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Can this widget be used in cornfields or other farms to process waste from agricultural activities, then collect the bio oils and other components and ship them to a refinery for further processing?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Could reduce pollution fr seasonal burning of plantations in S.E. Asia
      Guest (TSL) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Maybe this could be part of the solution to a huge problem in Indonesia where many plantation owners slash & burn old growth to replant every season.  It's causing massive smog problems to neighboring countries, e.g. Malaysia & Singapore. 
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Strip-mining our soils
    Guest (Leigh) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Although we use terms like waste and slash to refer to the organic matter left behind logging and agricultural operations, it is very short-sighted to think that it is efficient to take every last bit of biomass and turn it into fuel. The messy stuff left lying around after logging operations rots and replenishes the forest soil. Soil is depleted if you keep removing everything that's growing on it without putting organic matter back in. Why were they burning the slash in the first place? Bio-fuel is a good option in some circumstances, but it is a mistake to pursue it as  a large scale solution to our energy future. 
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Strip-mining our soils
      Guest (Paul712) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
        You missed one VERY important point, the first prototype was developed when the Canadian Interior minister saw that the forest slash was being burned in roadside bonfires.  Instead of wastefully burning this slash and releasing all green house gases it is being transformed into something much more beneficial.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • too much waste depletes the soil.
        Guest (Brian Wilkie) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
        Posts:
        1
        I know that with agricultural waste, it takes so much nitrogen to decompose cellulose, that the soil is actually depleted by the process. that's what makes the production of ethanol from corn/grain waste (stalks) good news for farmers. reduces the amount of high nitrogen fertilizer needed.
        Rate this comment: 12345
    • [no subject]
      Guest (Jay) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      I think the rule-of-thumb for these operations is to leave 25 per cent behind as nutrients for soil.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Do only if it is as good as large-scale plants
      Guest (CKE) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      The forest needs its organic compost base for fertility. Unless creating biofuel onsite in a small plant and in small batches is better than conventional feedstock methods at a central processing plant with its high efficiency & pollution controls, this looks like a waste.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • [no subject]
        Guest (RR) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
        Posts:
        1
        A lot of assumptions. The closer to the resource probably reduces the environmental footprint because of the resources used.
        Rate this comment: 12345
    • slash piles
      Guest (RD) on 08/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      So much debris is left after logging that it often interferes with the replanting of logged land.  A significant amount, but not all, of the debris is piled up to make replanting possible.  Trees will not grow where the slash piles sit.  With states like Washington initiating bans on slash burning, these piles reduce the productivity of forests.  Finding a use for the piles is a great leap forward.  I have 56 acres of slash I will volunteer as a start.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • "Slash" Processing Has Tradeoffs
      Guest (John Laumer) on 08/15/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Slash provides wildlife habitat, prevents soil from eroding after the over-story has been removed and soil surface torn by equipment.  It also provides humus. Loggers stack and burn it only because it nakes it hard for tree planting (monoculture creating) machines to do the next job.
      When I was a child I lived near a charcoal briquette making plant (a famous brand that starts with "K").  When a batch was processed and the cupulas on the roof open a horrid pungent acrid cloud of smoke and vapors contaminated the landscape for miles downwind.  It was truly repulsive.  Wood distillation creates a tar that is probably carcinogenic.  Someone will have to clean these machines from time to time, producing ghastly runoff and occupational exposures.  So lets not make out like this is a wonderful win win with no issues.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Soil Depletion
      Guest (Ron Wagner) on 08/16/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Good point, but commercial forests soils need to be treated like farm soils and replenished in a scientific manner.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • It's not strip-mining
      Julie on 08/23/2006 at 11:37 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Collecting slash from the forest doesn't have to be "strip-mining" it.  That is an option, definitely not a good one, but it's an option.  In reality, there are regulations and strong recommendations to forest practicioners that a certain percentage of coarse woody debris be left in the forest after forest operations in order to provide for ecological benefits such as nutrient cycling, soil productivity, water retention, protection for new seedlings, wildlife, etc.  What is left after that percentage is accounted for in the forest is generally disposed of by burning it in the forest--that's a waste of good energy.  Furthermore, too much debris left in the forest can have negative effects including fire hazards, hindering new forest growth, creating pest breeding sites, etc.   Adding forest "waste wood"/slash to our portfolio of fuel sources is a brilliant idea. 
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • efficency relative to enzyme digestion
    Guest (Tom H) on 08/16/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    I read recently about an altenative technology that used enzymes to break down the cellulose.  Anyone know hich would be the most effective?
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review July/August 2008
The Business of Social Networks
The future of the Web is social. But can social-networking sites ever make money?
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology