Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement
[1] 2 3 4 5 Next »

Saturday, July 01, 2006

The Oil Frontier

Don't expect the scarcity of fossil fuels to drive us toward alternative energy sources anytime soon: we're getting smarter about finding and extracting oil.

By Bryant Urstadt

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
The Discovery Deep Seas floats 190 miles south of New Orleans. (Courtesy of Paul Taggart.)
Multimedia
•  Video: Scientists speak out about the threat of global warming and how to deal with it.

The easy oil is gone. To get to the new oil, you board a yellow Bell 407 helicopter outside New Orleans and fly south, touching down 140 miles offshore, on a ship that's drilling holes in the seabed nearly a mile below.

Along the way, you fly down a 50-year timeline of American offshore oil extraction. Through the glass panel at your feet, you watch the delta slide by with its flat islands of green and its fishing camps, occasionally passing the remains of a barge rig -- the first and simplest waterborne oil rigs, which simply settled in the mud and drilled. After the barrier islands come the brown waters of the continental shelf of the Gulf of Mexico. Here, the platforms increase in number but are only slightly more complicated; of the roughly 4,000 platforms in the gulf, most are simple scaffolds standing on the bottom in 30 to 200 feet of water.

[Click here for views of the Discoverer Deep Seas and its oil-extracting equipment and monitors.]

But the barge rigs and the fixed-leg platforms are the past. So you keep flying, and the rigs grow scarcer but larger, until you leave the silty waters and hit the blue of the deep water, which shimmers like an opal lit from within.

Out here, 4,300 feet above the seafloor, floats Discoverer Deep Seas. Leased by Chevron, it's a ship that would have been too expensive to use 10 years ago, a ship that represents 20 years of advances in the art and science of oil extraction. It's not particularly beautiful. With its derrick amidships and its rusty waterline, Deep Seas looks like a ghost tanker trying to make off with the Eiffel Tower. But it is a breathtaking expression of ingenuity, and a glimpse of what we'll increasingly have to do to get energy.

The ship is so big that my incomplete tour will take a day. It's 835 feet long -- on end, it would be the height of an 80-story skyscraper -- and 125 feet wide. Because it is so tightly packed with machinery, a visitor winds through Deep Seas rather than walking its perimeter, as one might on a cruise ship, and never gains a full sense of its size.

My guide is Eddie Coleman, the lead drill-site manager on Deep Seas. A quiet Texan in a denim Chevron shirt and jeans, Coleman has spent the past 32 years offshore, working two weeks on and two weeks off, shuttling between his home of Brookhaven, MS, and platforms and drillships progressively farther offshore and more advanced. Like most of the people I meet in this business, he says he wouldn't want to do anything else.

Coleman is in a decent mood, but he could be happier. Last night, the drilling in a well that Chevron calls PS002 stalled at 20,351 feet. Deep Seas doesn't produce oil; it drills for it, capping the wells and leaving them to be put into "production" by equally expensive and complicated floating platforms. The oil field that Deep Seas is exploring is called Tahiti, and it's about 24,000 feet below a 5-by-1.5-mile section of seafloor leased from the Minerals Management Service of the U.S. government, in an area known as Green Canyon. PS002 is the second well of a scheduled six, and the whole field is slated to go into production in 2008. Chevron hopes to pump 125,000 barrels a day out of Tahiti.

Pumping is a long way off, though, and now the drilling has stopped, too. "We tagged something," explains Coleman, "but we're not sure what. So we're tripping right now." To "trip" means to bring the drill bit back up or send it back down. Coleman and a team back in Houston have decided that the casing, the tube that is dropped down in increasingly narrow segments as drilling progresses, in order to maintain the integrity of the well, has probably gotten out of round or developed a spur of some kind. So once they've tripped the bit back up, they'll send down a mill to bore out the casing. And when they've retracted the mill, the bit will have to be tripped down again.

The trip takes about 12 to 13 hours either way, and it's expensive. Deep Seas is leased from a company called Transocean, and the daily rent is about $250,000. With the cost of labor and equipment, drilling in Green Canyon costs Chevron around $500,000 a day. Casing, for instance, costs around $100 per foot. The drill bits run around $80,000 each, and there are 140 to 175 well-paid people onboard, from cooks to highly trained geologists. Developing the Tahiti field will cost about $3.5 billion.

Because of the resulting financial pressure, Deep Seashasn't been back to shore since it was launched five years ago. Every six months or so, a supply ship pulls up alongside and pumps a million gallons of diesel onboard. The fill-up takes about 24 hours. The diesel runs six generators, which send five megawatts of power to each of six electric omnidirectional thrusters, which keep the ship in position. On a calm day like this, the thrusters, fed by GPS data and overseen by a team of dynamic-positioning operators on the bridge, keep the 100,000-metric-ton ship essentially stationary; it drifts only by inches over the well below.

[1] 2 3 4 5 Next »
July/August 2006

Would you like to read more articles from the July/August 2006 issue?

This article is from the July/August 2006 Issue of Technology Review. To read other articles from this issue simply register for My.TechnologyReview.com. It's free.

Subscribe today and save up to 41% »

Comments

  • Excellent Article
    Guest (Sandra Kay Miller) on 07/18/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Bryant Urstadt has done an excellent job at describing a drilling detail. I worked drilling for nearly ten years with a company that developed one of the first real-time data acquisition systems for drilling projects. We digitized analog signals, pulled data from disparate systems owned by other service companies and used this new thing called the Internet to send the information back to corporate headquarters so the company geologists wouldn't have to actually come out to the job site to make decisions. In the late 90's, I made the transistion into enterprise IT. After reading Urstadt's article, I have a tinge of regret. There's nothing in the world like a drilling project.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • In case you didn't notice.......
      Guest (John Grey) on 07/19/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      ............there is a huge drilling boom on right now; I'm sure you could come back at any time :)
      John (drilling in Saudi)
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Do the math
    Guest (Phillip Farber) on 07/18/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Urstadt wants to paint an optimistic picture of the future by
    describing the heroic measures employed to find and produce oil. But
    for those who can do arithmetic the future of oil is not bright. The
    world consumes on the order of 30 billion barrels of crude per
    year. The (maybe) 44 billion left to be discovered and the (maybe) 70 billion
    left in the Ghawar field and the (maybe) 300 billion in the Alberta
    tar sands sounds like a lot but it equates to 414/30 = 13 years
    supply.  And this is does not even take into account the flow rate at
    which the remaining reserves can be produced.  Whether the flow rates
    can match the world demand is doubtful.  So, fine, there's oil out
    there but $75.00 is likely to look cheap within 5 years.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • [no subject]
      Guest (Ron Hawkins) on 07/18/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Or looked at another way, if there are roughly 1 trillion barrels of oil left, as the "Peak Oil" theorists suppose, then at a rate of 30 billion barrels/year, that is about 33 years of supply left.  Not a lot of time...
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Alternative Progress is Strong
        Guest (Joel) on 07/18/2006 at 12:00 AM
        Posts:
        1
        I have been very impressed with the advances in the efficiencies of the thin film photovoltaics for solar.  Most importantly, there have amazing advances in process technologies which are radically reducing the cost of production.
        The various paint-on or printable nano materials that are employed by nanosolar and several other companies will get the 5-year amortized cost of electricity down to coal-electric prices.
        and the advances in battery and plugin hybrid technologies should also be ready very soon.

        i think 33 years is plenty of time for the transition.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        • Solar Won't work for Transportation
          Guest (John Bill) on 07/19/2006 at 12:00 AM
          Posts:
          1
          We will never have a solar or wind 747 or solar truck. Only ethanol or methanol are viable alternatives. [H] fuel cells are too costly, it would be cheaper just to use internal combustion using [H] gas rather than fuel cell.  Fusion is the real power of the future, but it may never happen thanks to Ludites.
          Rate this comment: 12345
          • Solar Won't work for Transportation
            Guest (Jim) on 07/20/2006 at 12:00 AM
            Posts:
            1
            How will Fusion power planes ?
            Rate this comment: 12345
            • Solar Won't work for transportation
              Guest (F Warner) on 07/27/2006 at 12:00 AM
              Posts:
              1
              I don't know much about fusion but I would think it would be much the same as fission only safer and more efficient. All you would need to do is make a smaller scale reactor and a motor to convert the energy (heat) to mechanical power (inducted fan maybe) or even jet propulsion. I think making it work in an aircraft would be the easy part. The hard part is making it feasable in todays market and I don't think that's to far off.
              Rate this comment: 12345
    • more math
      Guest (Greg  Bothun) on 07/19/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      and there is more to this than the simple math of production and consumption.  While we now refer to the current situation as "Peak Oil" it is probably better characterized as Plateau Oil in that our current level of distribution at 83 million barrells of oil per day is likely to stay at that level.  In otherwords, yes improved drilling and extraction techniques may well be able to increase the rate at which crude is sucked from the ground but a commensurate increase in the distribution infrastructure would have to occur so that our capacity increases beyond the current 83 million barrels a day.

      Its probably wiser to push that potential investment money into large scale renewable projects.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • The math!
      Guest (David A. Fay) on 08/09/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Philip your math is not fuzzy - your math is frightening - and there are times I think the optimists are still winning.
      The math on ethanol is also frightening ...

      10-4
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Do the math
      GAMMARAY on 12/21/2006 at 2:41 AM
      Posts:
      1
      The world has produced about one trillion bbls in 110 years.  That amount has been passed in the produced fields.  A lot of it is behind pipe.  The majors are not interested in secodanary recovery or stripper wells because the easy oil is else where.  The new deep oil is also not in the traditional “oil window” and the thinking has to change to reflect the new discoveries.  I will keep my SUV. 
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • A Nice Reminder
    Guest (Jim Taylor) on 07/18/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    I moved to New England 4 years ago after 23 years with Conoco in the energy business.  It is nice to read an article that describes the complexity, cost and uncertainty of drilling and exploration for oil.  I am proud of what the energy industry is doing, but remained convinced that we must aggresively pursue alternative energy supplies and technologies.  The financial, technical, environmental and geopolitical risk of searching for elusive "elephants" will only increase over time.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • A nice reminder
      Guest (F Warner) on 07/27/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      I agree, the enrgy companies have put us at the top of the world when it comes to economic wealth and infrastructure ( along with other industries) but it is time to stop pursuing petroleum as the only source of energy. The oil companies are coming around but very slowly. In North Missouri I have seen a lot of ethynol and bio-diesel plants pop up in the last ten years and now there is going to be a new wind farm built here. We are getting there but not quick enough to suit me.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • What about the Artic?
    Guest (John cooper) on 07/18/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    The Artic has only been touched for oil exploration. Why are we not doing more to really determine what's available up there? A few more Prudoe Bay will extend all those projections to time frames where we can develope alteratives.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Why you ask?
      Guest (Question answered) on 07/18/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Because the Democrat agenda as hog tied the US energy industry all the while China drills all around our shores and in the most oil-potential shores globally.  They want to win the next world war.  Remember Clinton signed on to the Kyoto Agreement without including China or India.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • Why you ask?
        Guest (F Warner) on 07/27/2006 at 12:00 AM
        Posts:
        1
        Why spend all that money exploring for oil when it is not going to be the fuel of choice for the world in my lifetime. Spend those millions, I mean billions on finding and perfecting alternative fuels. If we as a people spent as much time energy, and money on alternative fuels we would be driving our cars and trucks using alcohol, biodiesel, hydrogen,etc. and would be less concerned about global warming and other environmental problems.
        Rate this comment: 12345
    • Prudhoe Bay
      Guest (David A. Fay) on 08/09/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      The tricky part about all those Prudhoe Bays is that the black stuff has to be shipped to the refineries.  We had been learn how to spend the money we need to maintain those pipelines ...
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Re: why you ask?
    Guest (zorro) on 07/19/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    yeah, right. The US of A is caught napping, as China goes all around it's shores, drilling for oil. And not just the USA, but the whole world's oil is being drilled and sucked up by little green, uh sorry little yellow men. ;-) Blame Canada!!!

    Poor naive innocent Bush forgot to thwart china and India's plans for global domination :-D
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • alternative fuels
    Guest (zorro) on 07/19/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    This article only makes clear the fact that in time, the petroleum lobby is going to find it more and more difficult to suppress alternative energy sources.

    Maybe in the next 10-20 years, alternative energy sources might just become the mainstay of the world. Here's hoping... :-)
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • re: alternative Fuels
      Guest (Scribbler) on 07/19/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      It's not the petroleum lobby, so much as the energy density of petroleum and its ease of use (and the cost to massively cross the infrastructure over to another energy source) that has kept alternatives at bay. When the cost for alternatives drops (as it's doing) and the energy density increases, while the price for oil products goes up, you have a much more receptive market.

      The main problem has always been that oil has so many good uses that replacing it takes the maturity of a multitude of technologies when none of them can perform as well as the petro across the board.

      Getting mad at the petroleum industry is like getting mad at the student that outperforms everybody in Arts, Science and Phys-Ed. And she looks good doing it to boot. Now I don't know about you, but I got over that thinking during high school.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • petro metro
    Guest (cybercityone) on 07/19/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    As a self confessed Ludite I once wrote a very short article for the newsletter of the local Solar Energy Society of Northern Alberta entitled, "Are Fossil Fuels Extinct?" It would seem that from all indications their ultimate demise is, like the fate that befell our fire loving Neanderthal cousins , all but inevitable. And as one individual put it so succinctly, the pyrotechnical age is coming to an end. It will be supplanted by rise of solid state alternatives. May this new technology, like the dinosaurs did, have a long and fruitful reign. William Eady
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • oil rigs
    Guest (ryan buschur) on 07/20/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    I'm on a rig 84 miles out and drilling for oil is very boring. I stare at a computer screen with drill details while also updating myspace info. and chatting to people I wish I could be with. Counting down the days until I go back home- 6.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Petro Metro you are ill informed
    Guest (Marco) on 07/20/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Reply to Petro Metro
    Guest (Marco) on 07/20/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Do you not know that Science has been lying to you for decades.
    Oil is the product of Combustion from the Fission in the core of the Earth. There is no shortage and there will never be a shortage of oil until the fission in the core of the earth stops. By then obviously we will all have stopped and would not care anyway.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • hmm..
      Guest (engineer Mike) on 07/21/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Fision in the earth's core.  So that's where all the Hydrogen and Helium has been hiding.  lol..  Combustion with fission and all that without oxygen.  That's a new one for me...lol..
      Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review January/February 2009
Lifeline for Renewable Power
Without a radically expanded and smarter electrical grid, wind and solar will remain niche power sources.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology