Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement

Saturday, July 01, 2006

Redesigning Life to Make Ethanol

Continued from page 1

By Jamie Shreeve

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

In 2004, Iogen, a Canadian biotechnology company based in Ottawa, began selling modest amounts of cellulosic ethanol, made using common wheat straw as feedstock and a tropical fungus genetically enhanced to hyperproduce its cellulose-digesting enzymes. But Iogen estimates that its first full-scale commercial plant, for which it hopes to break ground in 2007, will cost $300 million -- five times the cost of a conventional corn-fed ethanol facility of similar size.

The more one can fiddle with the ethanol-producing microbes to reduce the number of steps in the conversion process, the lower costs will be, and the sooner cellulosic ethanol will become commercially competitive. In conventional production, for instance, ethanol has to be continually removed from fermentation reactors, because the yeasts cannot tolerate too much of it. MIT's Greg Stephanopoulos, a professor of chemical engineering, has developed a yeast that can tolerate 50 percent more ethanol. But, he says, such genetic engineering involves more than just splicing in a gene or two. "The question isn't whether we can make an organism that makes ethanol," says Stephanopoulos. "It's how we can engineer a whole network of reactions to convert different sugars into ethanol at high yields and productivities. Ethanol tolerance is a property of the system, not a single gene. If we want to increase the overall yield, we have to manipulate many genes at the same time."

The ideal organism would do it all -- break down cellulose like a bacterium, ferment sugar like a yeast, tolerate high concentrations of ethanol, and devote most of its metabolic resources to producing just ethanol. There are two strategies for creating such an all-purpose bug. One is to modify an existing microbe by adding desired genetic pathways from other organisms and "knocking out" undesirable ones; the other is to start with the clean slate of a stripped-down synthetic cell and build a custom genome almost from scratch.

Lee Lynd, an engineering professor at Dartmouth University, is betting on the first approach. He and his colleagues want to collapse the many biologically mediated steps involved in ethanol production into one. "This is a potentially game-changing breakthrough in low-cost processing of cellulosic biomass," he says. The strategy could involve either modifying an organism that naturally metabolizes cellulose so that it produces high yields of ethanol, or engineering a natural ethanol producer so that it metabolizes cellulose.

This May, Lynd and his colleagues reported advances on both fronts. A team from the University of Stellenbosch in South Africa that had collaborated with Lynd announced that it had designed a yeast that can survive on cellulose alone, breaking down the complex molecules and fermenting the resultant simple sugars into ethanol. At the same time, Lynd's group reported engineering a "thermophilic" bacterium -- one that naturally lives in high-temperature environments -- whose only fermentation product is ethanol. Other organisms have been engineered to perform similar sleights of hand at normal temperatures, but Lynd's recombinant microbe does so at the high temperatures where commercial cellulases work best. "We're much closer to commercial use than people think," says Lynd, who is commercializing advanced ethanol technology at Mascoma, a startup in Cambridge, MA.

July/August 2006

Would you like to read more articles from the July/August 2006 issue?

This article is from the July/August 2006 Issue of Technology Review. To read other articles from this issue simply register for My.TechnologyReview.com. It's free.

Subscribe today and save up to 41% »

Comments

  • New Crop/Process already Here
    Guest (Lee McClune) on 07/19/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    I have developed a totally new crop/process that already can produce 2 times the Ethanol as Corn, and we can produce it at ZERO FOSSIL FUEL/ENERGY Input, if
    interested, see > sorganol.com < ,
    been trying to get some Government support, but have been unable to get any help,, it not only has High Potential, it is Very Low Cost to Grow, and is drought resistant, and can be grown anywhere in the US, with no exotic chemicals/enzymes needed,,
    Sugar cane can only be grown in tropical areas,, LFM, knoxville,Ia
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • LFM: You need a new web site
      Guest (plugged in) on 07/21/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      No way to contact you on sorganol.com. I can fix that. Two good ideas...congrats.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Sorganol Info omitted
      Guest (Mike) on 07/21/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Nice info, but you omitted Sugar Beets.

      Also - what temp will the ethanol boil/distill off at and at what % efficiency? Otherwise - good stuff!
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Sorganol
      Guest (Marty Riske) on 07/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      How much water is required.  Ethanol processes using corn require hundreds of thousands of gallons of water daily.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: New Crop/Process already Here
      reoplan on 08/21/2006 at 5:56 PM
      Posts:
      2
      Dear Lee

      Let's chat. I'll explain all when we do.
      info@reoplan.com   or   waxman44@verizon.net
      Send me your contact information.

      Thanks,

      Alan
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: New Crop/Process already Here
      sweetsorghum on 09/19/2006 at 7:36 PM
      Posts:
      1
      I can not find Mir.  Lee McClune's contact infor.  Please let me know.  I am very interested in the ideas he has.  I would ove to exchange some idea through the e-mail.

      My e-mail is flinqian@hotmail.com
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: New Crop/Process already Here
      waygmcgo on 11/06/2006 at 5:29 PM
      Posts:
      1
      Mr. McClune please contact me- I would like to get some more information.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • At least its not stem cell research
    Guest (sirlanse) on 07/21/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    The embryonic stem cell folks would have us believe that they are the cure for everything.  At least they aren't after this money.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Yankee-Doodlism
    Guest (Mike) on 07/21/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    What we need here is the spirit of the X Prize (for Space Flight) applied towards the ingenuity of scholars, companies and backyard inventors as to reward the creativity neccessary to overcoming obstacles like Fuel and Energy Shortages, Medical and Biological Breakthroughs etc. Hold out a $10 million dollar prize for anyone to collect is a great incentive!
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • I agree.
      Guest (Alex) on 07/23/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      I believe you hit the nail on the head.  A prize is needed to bring this research to a marketable product.  Mr. Gates and Buffett: where are you?
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Yankee-Doodlism
      Guest (Keith) on 08/02/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Concerning technology (including bio technology) and government subsidies.

      While i generally disagree with ongoing government funded research programs ware there is little to no incentive for results and often the incentive to use up all the monies given in yearly budgets in fear that next year those budgets will be reduced, all with out regard to how well the monies are used in research.

      The use of prize monies by the government, would provide  incentives to companies to compete in areas ware the people want the country to go.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Yankee-Doodlism
      reoplan on 08/21/2006 at 6:02 PM
      Posts:
      2
      Mike
      You are absolutely right. And, there are some business models out there that form the blueprint you suggest we need. Interestingly, the model has nothing whatsoever to do with the petroleum industry. I want to talk to Lee first. Then we'll determine which way to go. I've been down that road and I'm proud to say my thumbprint is on one of them. In this case, Yankee Doodle HAS A FARM!
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • How free is "free"?
    Guest (Jim D) on 07/23/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    What currently happens to the kilotons of "waste" that are supposed to fuel this scheme?  Whatever it is, it will be disrupted by the new technology -- here's hoping the cost of that disruption won't be a deal-killer.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Waste Matter
      Guest (Mike) on 07/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      If this solution actually works, then there should be little waste since some of the materials can be used as fodder or animal foods, some will be used as fuel to drive the ethanol distillation process, and the rest can be recycled in some type of huge compost pile. My one nagging question about the this is will the modified waste product contain organisms harmful to the natural envirionment and as animal feed?
      Rate this comment: 12345
      • [no subject]
        Guest (Sean) on 07/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
        Posts:
        1
        You'd just have to cook it a little and that should get rid of any lingering GMOs.
        Rate this comment: 12345
      • Cellulose Consumption
        Guest (John) on 07/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
        Posts:
        1
        Given that the organisms are based on the idea of converting cellulose to ethanol, and doing nothing else. I can't imagine it doing any real damage to humans, in the sense of flesh eating virus type of harm. However, while I believe we are incapable of digesting cellulose, if it got in our digestive system and survived it could potentially make us perpetually drunk?
        Either way, if it is something that can survive "in the wild", I can see it being very dangerous to crops.
        Rate this comment: 12345
  • You Left Out Syngas Fermentation
    Guest (C. Scott Miller) on 07/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    By gasifying your feedstock to break down the chemical bonds you can save water, time, and tons of purge disposal.  Cooling the syngas can co-generate electricity. Dr. Gaddy at BRI in Fayetteville, Ark. has created a bioreactor filled with patented bacteria that synthesize the CO and H2 into ethanol and water. The best part - the feedstock can be blended - tires, autofluff, C&D, waste, fossil fuels, MSW, etc. Try that with enzymes. Check out the process description at brienergy.com.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Make a food and energy system!
    Guest (R. Kellmer) on 08/07/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    It's simple to use this technique and use the land for food production.

    1. Grow the grain and harvest it. That's food for people.

    2.  Havest the stalks and use enzymes to convert to ethanol.  There's energy.

    3.  Feed the byproducts of the ethanol process to cattle or other animals.  That gives us more food.

    4.  Use the manure from the cattle to produce methane and use it to run a generator.  Sell the electricity to the power grid.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Cellulosic Waste
    jhawkmurph on 09/01/2006 at 10:18 AM
    Posts:
    1
       You erudite gentlemen are forgetting one thing:  TOC (total organic carbon),which farmers need to grow crops.  Eventually, if, as you plan, they deplete this resource,they are in trouble.
       Wood chips are suggested and are fine, but eventally, those with septic tanks, who need to convert NH3-nitrogen, to NOx-nitrogen, will be forced by EPA, et al, to compete in that deciduous market.
       But, I do like the octane route, but favor the bio-diesel route from algae (Green Fuels).    TPM
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • avoiding genetic engineering
    Cpt_Nemo on 01/22/2007 at 2:08 AM
    Posts:
    14
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    I read in an early 90s edition of New Scientist about the fascinating organisation of slime moulds. They are veritable cities filled with harmoniously interacting species of bacteria, etc.

    A woman received a MacArthur genius award for her pioneering research on the communication pathways between bacteria.

    I believe that it is possible to find and develop a cooperative slime mould that has as its primary purpose conversion of nutrient rich fluids - the unprocessed sap from sugar cane, or other plants that have a high proportion of sugars - into ethanol. With tuning (selective breding) and creative use of microfluidics the systems could be designed to increase the ratio of ethanol to other byproducts that are unwanted. It should be arranged with the provision of an intake reservoir and also a reservoir that collects its continual output.

    In otherwords, I believe that it should mimic the urinary(ethanol output) and digestion(consuming juice to be processed)/excretion(elimination of digested material) that is found in multicellular lifeforms.
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology