|
Wednesday, May 24, 2006 Plug-In Hybrids Are on the WayCars with advanced batteries get 100 mpg and boast far greater range than all-electric vehicles. By Kevin Bullis
Last week in Washington, DC -- even as top executives from Ford, Chrysler, and GM asked lawmakers to subsidize the installation of more ethanol pumps at filling stations -- makers of new battery systems were letting U.S. senators test-drive prototype cars that get over 100 miles per gallon, but don't require any new infrastructure. The vehicles in this road show, which are called plug-in hybrids, were Toyota Priuses retrofitted with large advanced battery packs that can be charged overnight and used to power the cars electrically for short trips. "If you look at how people typically drive cars, about half of the driving that you use gasoline for you could be using the electricity that comes out of your wall," says Martin Klein, CEO of Electro Energy of Danbury, CT, which developed the battery pack and control system for one of the cars on display in Washington. What's more, he says, the existing power grid means that "the infrastructure is all in place." [Click here for some shots of plug-in hybrids.] Ordinary hybrids get all their energy from gasoline, but they are much more efficient than conventional cars because extra energy from the engine and braking is stored in a battery pack, which powers an electric motor to boost acceleration and even fuel the car completely for short distances at low speeds. The boost allows hybrid automakers to use a smaller, more efficient internal-combustion engine without sacrificing performance. And hybrids also save gas by turning off their engines when stopped in traffic or at a stoplight. Overall, the fuel economy of a conventional Prius is around 50 miles per gallon. Plug-in hybrids have a larger battery pack, which allows them to run on the electric motor much longer -- for 20-25 miles in the case of the Electro Energy car. The battery is charged from an ordinary electrical outlet. Thus, a commuter who drives 10 or 15 miles to work on city streets could recharge the battery at night and make the commute entirely on electricity. Others would need the gasoline engine at highway speeds, but could rely on the battery while driving in the city. When the energy stored up overnight runs out, the car slips into conventional hybrid mode until the next charge. This gives the vehicle an advantage over all-electric vehicles, which have been hampered by limited range due to limited battery storage capacity.
|

Comments
Guest (Sean) on 05/23/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
(Okay, yeah, I know there wouldn't be a large percentage of the population buying these cars any time soon, but still.)
Guest (Matt) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Dave W) on 05/27/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
My main concern would be that the electricity coming out of the plug is not really all that efficient from a thermodynamic point of view.
Guest (Mark K) on 06/01/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
asdar on 08/07/2007 at 9:33 AM
64
It can be recycled easily.
Lithium isn't a hazardous material, however so it's not a threat even if someone is dumb enough to want to dispose of it.
Guest (Paul McLachlan) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Tim) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Paul) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Ned) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (JAB) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Steve) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Phil) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
This also amounts to 150 kwh over the course of a month. Currently the average house uses about 700 kwh per month.
So I disagree with your assertion that that draw is "tiny... compared to a television or home appliance."
Guest (Dick) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Arthur Bebell) on 05/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (SherryB) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Patrick M) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Phil) on 05/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (bob) on 05/27/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
its still in the prototype stage but its looks promising.
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,54917,00.html
burritos on 06/06/2007 at 3:07 PM
2
Guest (Dick) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Jim) on 05/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (J Young) on 06/02/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Most power plants can't raise and lower output based on demand. They have constant output. Therefore, charging them at night would use power that would otherwise be wasted.
Susan K on 02/21/2007 at 11:05 PM
2
To keep from burning more coal, the next step should be solar powered garages at home to plug electric cars into.
Imagine if malls and parking structures had solar panels on top, and sockets at every parking space so you could recharge during the day while at work, and in smaller topups while shopping.
Guest (Charlie Peters) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
(510) 537-1796
asdar on 08/07/2007 at 9:36 AM
64
We need a way out of oil, and this is one way that's sure to help and almost painless.
Guest (david) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Are there estimates as to how much a "recharge" will cost even at off-peak rates?
One needs to ask not just MPG but also MPD (miles per dollar - what the consumer looks at) and put gas and electricity into the same equation.
Guest (Priusmaniac) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
The other factor is gasoline price, that goes from 190 to 700 cent/gallon according to where you live, be it Dubai or London. This equals for a 50 mpg Prius to a range of 3.8 to 14 cent/mile.
From this it becomes obvious that even in Dubai, you gain in operating costs by driving with electricity.
Guest (rbh) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
After power plant and battery cycle efficiencies 'plug-ins' are NOT more effective than direct gasokine engines. The cost estimates above need about a 3X multiplier !
So while the cars could run on 'coal' that would be the extent of the gains, poluting (and CO2 at the power plant site instead of the city. This is a small effect with Pzf cars !!!
Guest (Priusmaniac) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
On the other hand, the question that you raise has already been answered by Professor Andy Frank of the University of California at Davis, even in the worst case scenario of electricity produced from coal an electric vehicle is still producing less CO2/mile then a standard car.
In the case of the Prius that difference is lower, but because the plug-in package also improves the regen capability of the car, it still exist. Especially in the hills or on mountain roads where much regen must be done.
burritos on 06/06/2007 at 3:17 PM
2
Guest (Aymeric) on 05/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
asdar on 08/07/2007 at 9:44 AM
64
What is like the chicken and egg is that if we have the cars, then making more solar/wind and other alternatives makes more sense, because we'd have the storage to make better use of it.
Guest (Phil) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
With regard to cost, Priusmaniac under quoted the range of the cost of electricity. A kWh in my area already costs 20 cents, and I know I don't live in the most expensive power region in the US. Other countries as a whole pay as much as 30 cents.
Guest (J Young) on 06/02/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Yes it takes fuel to produce the electricity to charge the batteries but that is usually not oil. It also takes energy to transport oil and refine it. How much I don't know.
By the way, my electricity costs between 3 and 9 cents per kwh depending on how much I use.
Guest (KB) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
But the main advantage of plug-ins could be reducing dependence on oil
Guest (Phil) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Greg) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (ReubenDenver) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Consumers would be faced with higher up front costs for vehicles. They are also the first to want 100MPG AND the first to demand warranty repairs if those batteries and recharging systems don’t perform ( more risk for Honda – the other hybrid Mfr- I love my Honda!)
So where is all the Freedom Car and PNGV money going? Maybe our tax dollars should be shifted to reward patents on batteries or tuition for continuing education of physical sciences ( math, chemistry, physics…)
PHEV need better batteries and that has been the mantra ever since California tried to push EV’s . Don’t hold your breath!
Guest (Christi in Toledo) on 05/24/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Upfront costs for PHEVs will deter all but the yuppies and the EV lunatics who will pay anything to say they are driving only with electricity. Most people will do the math and realize the cost savings will never exceed the initial costs. And unfortunately not too many people really care about the environmental benefits over the impact on their pocketbooks.
Research money needs to be put towards much much better battery technology to increase life, reduce weight, and reduce cost, before PHEVs or EVs will be successful. Sorry EV fanatics! Reality bites.
Guest (William Millard) on 05/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Phil) on 05/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1