Floating wind farms placed far offshore could lead to affordable electricity -- without cluttering the view.
Huge turbines mounted on floating platforms could make wind power competitive with fossil-fuel-generated electricity. These advanced wind turbines, which are in development, could be situated far from the shore, too, avoiding battles with onshore residents who object to the presence of large wind farms.
GE has announced a $27 million partnership with the U.S. Department of Energy to develop 5-7 megawatt turbines by 2009, each of which could power well over 1,000 homes. Supplanting the company's current 3.6 megawatt turbines, these giant energy factories should make wind power more economical, since the major cost of building and installing offshore wind farms does not depend primarily on a turbine's size, but on the number of them that need to be erected. By 2015, GE could have even bigger, 10-megawatt turbines, according to Jim Lyons, leader of advanced technology for GE's wind energy business.
[For images and illustrations of wind turbines, click here.]
Making the turbines larger, however, comes with technical challenges. The new turbines will be mounted to towers rising 90 to 95 meters and will have rotors measuring 140 meters in diameter. Imagine a structure larger than a football field rotating at a leisurely ten to twelve revolutions per minute. To decrease the weight of the massive rotor blades and tower, GE plans to use composite fibers, as well as alternatives to the weighty gearboxes now used to transfer energy from the rotor to the electrical generator.
The new turbines will also need to be more reliable than their onshore counterparts, because maintenance will be far more difficult and expensive. GE is developing new ways to deal with the extreme battering the turbines will receive from the wind.
Today's turbines compensate for changes in wind speed by actively turning their blades to catch less wind. The new turbines will adapt to gusts by using sensor-based technology that will quickly angle the blades out of the wind to reduce the wear and tear on the turbine. These sensors could include basic accelerometers, embedded fiber-optic sensors that detect shape changes in the blades in response to gusts, and forward-looking, laser-based "radar" that allows the turbine to anticipate wind-speed changes.
None of these technological advances will make a difference, however, if erecting monstrous turbines is blocked by shoreline residents who see them as visual pollution. A potential solution is floating platforms that allow the turbines to be located farther out in the sea -- and out of sight. Current projects locate wind turbines in waters less than 20 meters deep. Going farther out on the continental shelf, which extends several hundred kilometers from the U.S. East Coast, would mean locating them at depths up to 50 meters, which is probably too deep to build towers or trusses that support turbines standing on the sea floor, at least at an affordable cost.
A continuously variable transmission could lead to cheaper wind power--if it is rugged enough.
New direct-drive turbines promise to lower the cost of offshore wind energy.
Guest (CKE)
Finally, folks are onto the right energy track for the longterm future. I'd like to see what sort of money shows first up to build the initial offshore deepwater proof-of-concept windmill farms. Any speculation?
Guest (Jason)
I don't know if they'll end up getting enough people on board in time. I do know that I need more time and money so I can start patenting these ideas when I have them instead of readign about them online when someone else beats me to it.
Guest (Greg)
Guest (Charles Schmidt)
Perhaps the state of Mass and Ted Kennedy will provide the funding for the offshore windmills since they think NIMBY.
Guest (blert)
Absolutely no need to go off shore until easier land based locations are 'used up.' Of course, that can never happen.
Oceanic windpower only makes sense for tropical islands that have sweet trade winds. They also have 'small' energy demand. Pumped storage would work for them, as would reverse osmosis water production.
But truly large scale wind energy production is out of the question in our lifetimes.
Ultimately, wind will always be a niche.
Hydropower is the real solution. The tropics abound with fantastic hydro-energy that is not being exploited. There are enough hydro-watts to power the planet as it stands.
Guest (gary w. davis)
I agree, no large scale facillities in my lifetime. However,we need to reexamine nuclear power.
I disagree. If you adhere to massive land farms of the Pickens Plan, for instance, you are spending a lot of money on land acquisition, legal battles, tensions with local populations, etc. (Pickens might disagree, since he mysteriously owns a lot of the land in the wind corridor)
Far offshore rigs combined with unpopulated desert solar and wave energy is the future I think. It has the interesting cultural side effect of making us think about space colonization as well, if you really want to push day dreaming to the next level. The idea that you can create energy out of nowhere and maybe live near that energy...
Guest (Gert)
Vertical axis wind turbine introduces competitive advantage
I'm still intrigued by this vertical axis wind turbine concept: http://opensourceenergy.org/txtlstvw.aspx?LstID=99b82ae5-287f-4bb4-868d-2a44417a564b
Guest (Jak)
If giant turbines are to be installed, it had better be before the oil gets so expensive and scarce that the resources just won't be there. The idea that distant turbines would be acceptable to coastal residents is just pandering to the rich, who are the main opponents. I think that this resistance will wane when there are energy alternatives diminish. We don't here that much ,the ugly, visible, oil platforms installed off the pacific coast; they are considered necessary.
Guest (Roxanne)
Vertical Turbines already work
For vertical turbines already in use, see Oy Windside Production Ltd (www.windside.com). Pratical, and even pretty.
Guest
why not just build more nuc reactors?
Guest (Luca)
http://www.kitewindgenerator.com/
It may seems a little strange.
Guest (Sir Lanse)
I advocate windmills on top of
city buildings. The only real argument is having them in shipping lanes near cities.
Guest (Alan B)
We've got some near us (top left image):
http://www.industcards.com/wind-ireland.htm
I think they look fantastic. Especially if the alternative is a particularly nondescript stretch of the Irish sea.
Guest (Steve)
I just don't understand the NIMBA (not in my backyard) concerns relating to windmills. People have to decide which is worse - reducing our CO2 emmissions and dependancy on middle east oil, or what thier view looks like. Secondly, based on some estimates, up to 25% of species will be extinct due to global warming in the next 50 years or so at our rate of increase in CO2 concentrations. I think when all sides are considered - windfarms (and tons of them) are a smart alternative.
Guest (Jon)
yes, you don't understand, but you should try to. First, oil is not used for electricity generation, or very little, so wind power has nothing to do with dependence on foreign oil. Second, wind power is intermittent, that is, it might provide peak load but not base load electricity, that is you cant run a factory or school or hospital on it so wind will never displace a fossil fuel plant. Third, when the wind blows most (winter) is when peak power is needed least. Its not about NIMBY, it's about reality vs wishful thinking.
Guest
Jon, I respectfully disagree. Hopefully in the future, we will not be using fossil fuels, but will either be using electricity, bio-fuels or hydrogen to run our machinery. The latter two require high levels of electricity to convert from raw material components to a useful energy. Thus, electricity consumption can directly affect the amount of foreign oil that we use because it enables us to produce our own supplies of energy. The key now is to identify a better storage technology that is scalable.
Steven
www.SurvivingPlanet.com
Guest (zeebo)
I have to disagree. You are thinking "inside the box" and it is making seem like a giant stain on humanity. Wind and solar should be the future energy sources because they are not contributing CO2. While they may not be as steady source as a coal generator, there are probably ways around that. Better capacitors, batteries etc. To advocate for the continuation of fossil fuel energy plants is horrible.
Guest (Joan)
Jon isn’t advocating fossil fuels. Jon is suggesting we wake up and smell the coffee. Wind power is not reliable and cannot supply the steady constant energy we need. It has to be constantly supported by reliable energy. Now, you tell us what exists now to supply that back up?
Hmmm. I wonder how many batteries will be needed to run a city?
Guest (Cliff)
Backup to Wind Power Variability
Hi!
One way U can back up a wind power farm would be to build hydrogen fuel cells at the wind farm site. When the wind blows, they convert the water to hydrogen. When the wind stops, the fuel cell acts as a giant battery and provides electricity, by converting the hydrogen back to water. The cycle repeats over and over, with minimal loss of electical power flow.
Guest (shetu)
Keep in mind that we're not looking at wind/solar/hydro to replace another form of power generation, but just to supplement it. In that respect, I think it's a great alternative.
But I do wish people like Ted Kennedy would be more consistent on their views. Don't claim to support wind energy and then refuse to have wind turbines put up in their area. Personally, I think they look pretty slick.
Guest (Hal Ade)
NIMBA concerns - wind farm "aesthetics"
Here, here, Steve!! Good for you! Right on!!
Hal.
GAtineau, QC.
Guest (Danny)
The brits have been working on that since 2003
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3063433.stm
Guest (Henri)
I see this in Belgium & holland almost since whole my life, it is clean & cheap energy.. OK you see the turbines.. but at least they don't pollute nor do they give smoke
Guest (Da Big Show)
Guest (Willem)
For how long ?
Guest (shetu)
Yes, because oil "comes from nothing," right?
And exactly how much are the turbines going to slow down the wind? And if these turbines are built far offshore, what will the affect be?
Constructing an office building slows down the wind. Flying a kite slows down the wind. Planting trees slows down the wind. I'm not buying the butterfly effect.
Guest (Rob)
trees also slow down the wind - see any subsurban landscaping book. Maybe this can make up for rates of deforestation.
Guest (Rich)
Also slows down global warming
Slow down the wind... hey maybe that is good for the environment??? The energy from the wind goes into producing waves. The wave energy is eventually transferred to the earth as heat. Less wind --> less waves --> less GW. Gee, maybe the weather will be more consistent too since there will be less wind to change the climate...unless that some how this cause the butterflies to multiply faster, then we'll just be back to more wind from all the wing flapping. THAT'S IT!... Butterfly Power.
Guest (O.A.K)
Withall due respect, you don't seem to have a good grasp on scale. By simply being, everything changes everything else. The question ... to what extent. Yes the wind that turns the turbines will slow. What proportion of global wind are we talking here ... I'm sure one ten billionth would be way to high an estimate ... think jet stream.
Guest (henri)
In my whole life i have seen stupid remarks.. but this scores the Max.
Guest (Adam)
I don't really know what to say this response although, it seems to be the the most idiotic comment to say to this topic, it amused me greatly. So, I wont fully describe how I feel, I just hope it can be implied.
Guest (Wind man )
Gee - you guys really don't get it do you, even wind farms designers know that each wind turbine extracts energy from the wind and therefore you have to allow for that in the layout of a farm, so yes wind turbines do slow the wind down. Slow it down too much and you have a big problem, this is one big eco system suck too much energy from it and there will be consequences, smog anyone, no refreshing breeze to remove car fumes, its about scale - too many farms will cause problems - try reducing the population by 2/3 d's that will sort it out .
Guest (Mark Shapiro)
Wind power can play well with others . . .
Wind power continues to mature technologically and come down in price. We can deal with intermittency by having a portfolio of turbines in different places, plus real time pricing and demand side management. Storage (outside of the batteries in your phone or iPod) may not be necessary at all. Wind, and other renewables, look better all the time.
Guest (ms)
If we don't start seriously reducing our use of fossil fuels, Cape Cod will disappear under water due to global warming induced sea level rise.
Guest (Kris Saseniuk)
Great point. Though they probably have lots of land farther in land too.
Guest (roseyred)
Guest (Roy)
Given that you now have to construct fancy platforms far out at sea along with more rugged and expensive turbine, the question is: Why wouldn't you want to use wave power instead? It has none of the view or bird-kill problems and if the area covered is not an issue then it can easily generate as much power. There are numerous companies exploring this option with a variety of designs.
Guest (shetu)
I don't see this as being a wind vs. waves issue -- no more than it's a wind vs. solar vs. hydro vs. nuclear vs. coal vs. natural gas. The point of all of these alternative energy sources is to supplement the power grid, not to execute a hostile takeover for exclusive control.
So if we flip each "vs" to a plus (+), that'll make more sense to me.
Today's power plants are really just portfolios of turbines from different energy sources. When natural gas is cheap, they fire the gas turbines and ease up on the coal furnaces. And when natural gas prices shoot up, they let the gas turbines rest and rely on the coal furnaces. So even today, there's not a single source used for power generation. All we are doing with wind/solar/etc. is give additional support to the grid so we're not dependent on any single source of turbine fuel.
Competition is a wonderful thing.
Guest (blert)
homopolar generator dumps the gear box
One could design such turbines to directly drive homopolar generators of novel construction.
Such generators do not need high rpm to punch out plenty of EMF.
Further, homopolar generators are DC and might well be rigged to electrolyze hydrogen on the spot.
Clever anode membranes could repress chlorine production, eliminating the need for fresh water.
All manner of synchronization issues would be dead, and the voltages throughout the design would be nominal.
This concept ought to be pursued as a real route to the hydrogen economy.
The first, best use of the output: increased refinery efficiency. Convert 'bottoms' to 'tops'.
Guest (scatman)
Has anyone thought of putting solar panels on these WindTurbines? I mean, as long as they're out there in the sunlight, use them to generate solar energy too.
Guest (shetu)
I think one of the major barriers to solar right now is the high cost of silicon and other materials used to make the panels.
If there cheap enough to mass manufacture, I wouldn't mind seeing solar panels just about everywhere that people couldn't see them (on top of buildings, light poles, bus stops, and perhaps even wind turbines.
Guest (blert)
Dazzle painting ( WWI naval camoflage) makes turbines disappear at a distance yet obvious close up
Using modern art techniques -- Dazzle Painting -- the British Royal Navy was able to make her ships invisible to the naked eye even when they were within sight -- not yet over the horizon.
This effect is do to the way our brains recognize optic input as real or noise.
The use of dazzle painting ended with radar. It didn't fool the beam.
Guest (Oly)
why not combine these turbines with wave generators to capitalize on both forms of natural motion.
Guest (EFM)
Wind turbines and wave energy converters
Wave nergy converters of the overtopping type like Wave Dragon (www.wavedragon.net) are large structures which are well suited to act as foundations for wind turbines
Guest (ravi)
Non-conventional system simulation
is any body having the idea how to simulate non conventional energy sources in matlab simulink
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
On Twitter
Become a Fan on Facebook
Subscribe to the Feed
Guest (Karl)
Subtract Old Thread
Waht is htis?
Reply