|
Tuesday, April 25, 2006 Holographic SolarContinued from page 1 By Prachi Patel-Predd
But traditional concentrators are complicated. Since the lenses or mirrors that focus light need to face the sun directly, they have to mechanically track the sun. They also heat up the solar cells, and so require a cooling system. As a result, although they redirect light with more intensity than the hologram device, "they're unwieldy...and not as practical for residential uses," says National Renewable Energy Laboratory spokesperson George Douglas. Holograms have advantages that make up for their relatively weak concentration power. They can select certain frequencies and focus them on solar cells that work best at those frequencies, converting the maximum possible light into electricity. They also can be made to direct heat-generating frequencies away from the cells, so the system does not need to be cooled. "In this way, you are efficiently using only that part of the sunlight that really matters," says Selim Shahriar, director of the atomic and photonic technology laboratory at Northwestern University in Evanston, IL. Also, different holograms in a concentrator module can be designed to focus light from different angles -- so they don't need moving parts to track the sun. Prism Solar's system incorporates these advantages. Nevertheless, to be competitive with other solar technologies available today, the company might need to reduce its price below $2.40 a watt, says Christo Stojanoff, professor emeritus of engineering at the Aachen University of Technology in Germany. CEO Lewandowski says the holographic modules will cost about $1.50 per watt in a few years, using their second-generation technology, which will have solar cells sandwiched between two glass panels containing holograms. At that price, they'll start to compete with fossil fuel-generated electricity, which now costs almost three times less than conventional solar electricity, according to San Francisco, CA-based research and consulting company Solarbuzz. The modules' intensive use of glass could be adding to their cost, says Douglas. Still, such a novel idea for a concentrator, using holograms, could be a lucrative investment because it needs less silicon than flat-panel modules and therefore saves money. The high demand for solar cells in Germany and other European countries "has now outstripped the supply, which has [led to] a silicon shortage and a shortage of manufacturing in the photovoltaic world," he says. Although the idea of holographic solar concentrators has been around since the early 1980s, no one has developed them commercially yet, according to Professor Stojanoff, who has investigated the technique extensively. His company, Holotec GmbH in Aachen, Germany, researches and manufactures holographic materials. Also, Northeast Photosciences, a Hollis, NH-based company, came close to manufacture, before it went defunct for reasons unrelated to the technology or to finance, he says. So, if all goes according to plan, Prism Solar could be the first company to manufacture and sell holographic solar concentrator modules. |

Comments
Guest (Sam DeLay) on 04/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (D Van B) on 04/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (T De W) on 04/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (ken novak) on 04/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (DSMatthews) on 04/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
:-) Dan.
http://dan.3-e.net
Guest (peter segaar) on 04/28/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (dsmatthews) on 07/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Coreyjacob on 08/14/2007 at 5:48 PM
4
Maybe there is a process similar to bullet resistant glass that could be applied a 1/2 inch or so above the actual panel to reduce or eliminate the shock of the hail directly against the panel and to try to eliminate any deflection of the sun's rays.
By placing this bullet resistant like glass or plastic 1/2 inch or so away from panel would allow you to replace any cracked or damaged shields without having to replace the precious panel itself.
Guest (Robert Loest) on 04/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Craig) on 04/27/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (John Nicholson) on 04/27/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Liang Ji) on 04/27/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
A module or panel is to be subjected to a 5 ft-lb (6.78 J) impact normal to the surface resulting from a 2-in (51-mm) diameter smooth steel sphere weighing 1.18 lb (535 g) falling through a distance of 51 in (1.295 m). The module or panel is to be struck at any point considered most vulnerable.
The pass criteria is that there shall be no accessible live parts, and breakage of the front material is acceptable provided there are no particles larger than 1 square in (6.5 cm2) released from their normal mounting position.
Guest (dan) on 04/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Barry) on 04/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Inquiring jv) on 04/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Jonni Blaze) on 04/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Think about it...
Do you really think the Power companies - or for that matter - the Govt - would like for us to be free of the grid ??
The power companies want our money
The Govt wants to control us.
Working Together they both get what they want...
That is why there is no REAL tech breakthroughs in eletrical energy generation. That tech gets squashed.
Guest (joey) on 04/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (dinther) on 04/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Are you telling me they don't use this in geothermal area's in the US?
Guest (John Nicholson) on 04/27/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Lan Mandragoran) on 04/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Maury) on 04/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
> or for that matter - the Govt - would like for
> us to be free of the grid ??
Of course! Geez, you think they LIKE paying millions on millions of dollars to deliver a product to your house, and not make a penny doing it?! Reducing delivery costs improves their bottom line, trust me, if they could get people off the grid, they'd do it. It's not like you'd stop buying the product, after all, you drive TO the gas station to get their product.
> The Govt wants to control us.
I hope your tin foil helmet is in good working condition. Meanwhile for those of us who live on planet Earth, buying a few compact florescent lights is something that actually helps.
Maury
Guest (mas) on 04/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Eric) on 04/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (John Nicholson) on 04/27/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (JJK) on 04/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
It must be a conspiracy by The Man to keep us down somehow.
Guest (ss) on 04/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (mike) on 04/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (ted) on 04/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (peter segaar) on 04/28/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Paul Palmer) on 04/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Silicon chemist) on 04/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
One could argue that hydrogen should be easy to come by, as we have an ocean full of it. Unfortunately, like silicon, it has already combined with oxygen.
Coreyjacob on 08/14/2007 at 6:04 PM
4
If the panels are not recyclable, then its not renewable. Eventually you will run out of a particular resource needed to produce them. Thus making the sun's renewable energy is mute. For the whole process is as strong as the weakest link.
Guest (Paul Allen) on 04/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Carl Lenox) on 04/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Silicon for solar cells (and semiconductors) is currently very expensive for two reasons. First as noted, it needs to be very high purity. Second is simply supply and demand. Silicon demand has skyrocketed as PV has taken off. Sometime this year, the PV industry will be using more silicon than the rest of the semiconductor industry behind. This took polysilicon manufacturers by surprise. Polysilcion plants are capital intensive and take a couple of years to come on line. So, right now there is a shortage. Most likely, as plants come online over the next coupel of years, there will be overcapacity for a while and prices for polysilicon will fall dramatically.
Guest (CL) on 04/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Robert Loest) on 04/26/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest on 04/27/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
http://solarbuzz.com/
Genesis on 11/11/2008 at 10:57 PM
2
Coreyjacob on 08/14/2007 at 6:12 PM
4
If you could some how minimize or eliminate the aluminum for example then the payback for energy will be shorter in that its less energy intensive to produce. The key is finding less energy intensive and renewable process to make it sustainable in the end. Through minimizing resource + recycling
Genesis on 11/11/2008 at 10:55 PM
2
Guest (Harvey) on 04/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (kitk) on 04/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1