|
Monday, March 27, 2006 Methanol: The New HydrogenAdvances in methanol synthesis, coupled with improved fuel cell technology, could make it a viable alternative to gasoline. By Chandra Shekhar
Hydrogen has been getting plenty of hype as a potential replacement transportation fuel, for cutting carbon dioxide emissions and reducing dependence on fossil fuels. But methanol would be far better than the more reactive and volatile hydrogen, argues George Olah, a chemist and Nobel laureate, in a new book, Beyond Oil and Gas: The Methanol Economy. Olah notes that methanol, a clean-burning liquid, would require only minor modifications to existing engines and fuel-delivery infrastructure (see "The Methanol Economy"). And manufacturing it could even make use of carbon dioxide, a source of global warming. Methanol's benefits have long been understood -- now recent advances in methanol synthesis and methanol fuel cells could make this fuel even more attractive. Currently, about 90 percent of the worldwide production of methanol (CH3OH) is derived from methane (CH4), the main component of natural gas. Today's methods of making methanol have two stages: converting methane into syngas, a mixture of primarily carbon monoxide and hydrogen, and then into methanol. Although these steps have become more efficient over time, the elimination of the syngas step could save money, since it currently accounts for up to 70 percent of the cost of making methanol. In an effort to eliminate this cost, Olah and his colleagues have explored ways of converting methane directly into methanol. "You take methane and stick in just one oxygen atom," says Olah, director of the Loker Hydrocarbon Research Institute at the University of Southern California (USC). "Easily said, but not so easily done." The problem is that methane is chemically inert, and combines readily with oxygen only at high temperatures. A catalyst helps, but commonly used catalysts themselves work only at 300 degrees Celsius or higher. At these temperatures, most of the methanol produced is oxidized to carbon dioxide and water. Indeed, methanol yields from such reactions can be as low as 2 percent. Recently discovered lower-temperature catalysts offer better yields, says Roy Periana, associate professor of chemistry at USC. Using a platinum-based catalyst dissolved in concentrated sulfuric acid at 200 degrees Celsius, Periana has achieved a methanol yield of more than 70 percent. He's now looking for less expensive catalysts, and has found some promising ones. Olah and his colleague Surya Prakash, professor of chemistry at the university, have developed an alternative method for converting methane to methanol, using a halogen such as bromine. In the presence of special catalysts and at less than 250 degrees Celsius, methane reacts with bromine to form methyl bromide (CH3Br) and hydrogen bromide (HBr). Methyl bromide then reacts with water to form methanol. The bromine from the hydrogen bromide can be recovered by reaction with air, and reused. Making methanol from natural gas -- which still involves fossil fuels and increases carbon dioxide in the atmosphere -- is just the first step, says Olah. Chemists have long known that methanol can be made by combining carbon dioxide and hydrogen. Such a process requires considerable energy, for example, to harvest the hydrogen from water, but this energy could come from carbon-free sources such as nuclear or wind power. The carbon dioxide could be captured from flue gases, and eventually directly from the atmosphere, he says.
|
A Sunshine Deal
09/06/2005









Comments
Guest (Jessey) on 03/27/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (dursun ) on 03/28/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Jessey) on 03/28/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Dave) on 03/29/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
robsacrob on 04/15/2008 at 7:08 PM
1
9700 ELMIRA CIRCLE
SACRAMENTO, CA 95827-1120
Tele/Fax: 916-363-9705
EMail: ROBSACROB@cs.com
April 15,2008
ATTENTION: (dursan)
In this letter, I will make some statements in favor of a Methanol Economy rather than a Hydrogen or Ethanol Economy.
A methanol hybrid vehicle would have a fuel injection internal combustion engine with methanol fuel for rural transportation and a direct methanol fuel cell for urban transportation. With this possibility in mind, I have created the low pressure Cellulosic Methanol Process which utilizes hydrous thermolysis to convert glucose from enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass to glycolaldehyde which is decarbonylated to methanol.at moderate temperature and pressure.
Actually, methanol has a low vapor pressure, but this fault can be resolved by utilization of fuel injection in the internal combustion engine and it is the reason that methanol is the choice as a non-explosive racing fuel. While methanol fuel requires special materials for storage and handling, the same condition applies to ethanol fuel.
Hydrogen is difficult to handle and store because of its small molecular size and it is expensive to produce by electrolysis of water. Ethanol produced by fermentation of wet milled corn starch requires corn planted on land which displace other food crops causing food price inflation, the fermentation process releases a substantial quantity of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, and ethanol requires a government subsidy of about 50 cents per gallon.
Overall, I prefer a methanol economy to either hydrogen or ethanol economies.
Can the you help me with the Cellulosic Methanol Process (data sheet is available upon request)?
Sincerely,
_____________
R.J."Jim"Robinson
Guest (Rable Rouser) on 04/03/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Join the crusade to eliminate Dihydrogen Monoxide, also known as Hydric Acid, from the environment! Get the facts on this dangerous chemical at http://www.dhmo.org/dihydrogen-monoxide/
Guest (Dave McG) on 08/08/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
On serious note though abatoir wastes are used in AD processes to produce methane which is combusted or used in fuel cell CHP systems.
Guest (anthony hartley) on 03/29/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (David Weiseth) on 03/29/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Andrew) on 08/02/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Chuck Stone) on 04/25/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
See work done in Future Fuels Corp. in 1980-1981. Millions of test miles. Keep on track for America and the environment.
forEnergy on 08/03/2008 at 10:38 AM
1
Would like to know the pros and cons of methanol production from biomass Vs fossil fuel sources from the point of view of -
1. capital cost
2. operating cost
3. emissions
if possible, pls give a reference to the smallest commercial scale methanol plant based on biomass as raw material
Thanks.