Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

December 2005

Photo Essay: Dirty Oil

Oil companies are, to the chagrin of environmentalists, mining a rich source of bitumen in Canada.

By Katherine Bourzac

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

As oil has become scarcer and more expensive, oil companies have begun seriously pursuing a politically charged method of oil extraction in Canada.

The ­world's second-­largest oil reserve lies under Alberta in the form of oil sand, which must be processed extensively to yield bitumen, a hydrocarbon mixture related to asphalt that can be turned into crude oil. It is estimated that 174 billion barrels of oil of varying quality could be recovered from the sands. Development is speeding ahead: so far, 34 billion Canadian dollars have been spent developing the oil sands, and another 45 billion in development projects will be completed by 2010 by companies including Petro-Canada, Syncrude, and Suncor.

Oil companies use large machinery and pipelines to transport the sand and rely on welling technologies to extend their reach to the bitumen buried far below the surface. With production at about one million barrels of oil per day in 2005 and expected to double by 2010, environmental groups worry that oil-sands development is speeding ahead too quickly. The following photos illustrate the process--and impact--of getting oil from sand.

1. A grain of oil sand consists of a mostly quartz particle enveloped in a film of water, which is surrounded by bitumen, a thick, heavy oil. It takes roughly two metric tons of this sticky sand to produce one barrel of crude oil. [Click here to view image.]

2. Where the oil sands lie close to the surface, mostly near the town of Fort McMurray in Alberta, they can be mined. In the effort to get at these sands, areas have been drained of wetlands and stripped of boreal forests, which play an important role in climate regulation and carbon storage. Their destruction contributes to the greenhouse effect. [Click here to view image.]

3. About 80 percent of Alberta's oil sand is too far below the surface to dig up. The most common method for getting the bitumen out is through two parallel horizontal wells lined with perforated pipe. Heat from high-temperature steam injected down one of the wells softens surrounding bitumen--which in oil sand form normally flows about as easily as Crisco--causing it to separate from the sand and flow down into the second well, from which it is pumped to the surface. [Click here to view image.]

4. Equipment used by oil-sand miners includes tractors with top-mounted radiators and cooling fans to protect their engines from oil particles and sludge, thousand-metric-ton shovels, and the Caterpillar 797. This colossal dump truck weighs more than 500 metric tons when empty. When its tires wear out after about a year, they are reused as cattle feeders.

Producing crude oil from the Alberta sands is an energy-­intensive process. Giant digging and transportation machines use commensurately large amounts of fuel. Refining and welling technologies consume roughly 30* cubic meters of natural gas per barrel of recovered oil. Environmental watchdogs estimate that, as a result, producing a barrel of oil from the Alberta sands releases two to three times the volume of greenhouse gases that traditional oil production would. By 2015, production from the oil sands is projected to release 94 megatons of greenhouse gases.

Oil sand retrieved from surface mining is crushed and then moved to a processing plant via "hydrotransport." As the sand, mixed with water, tumbles through transport pipes, the clumps of bitumen, sand, and water begin to loosen. [Click here to view image.]

*In the version of this article that appeared in the Dec. 2005/Jan. 2006 issue of Technology Review magazine this figure was mistakenly cited as 300.

[1] 2 Next »
December/January 2005

Would you like to read more articles from the December/January 2005 issue?

This article is from the December/January 2005 Issue of Technology Review. To read other articles from this issue simply register for My.TechnologyReview.com. It's free.

Subscribe today and save up to 41% »

Comments

  • Alternative Fuels
    Guest (TR Reader) on 12/21/2005 at 2:06 PM
    Posts:
    1
    The world has become so dependant on oil that we are willing to go to any extent to get it.  Here we are destroying large areas of delicate ecosystems to get very expensive oil in a process that releases more pollution than a standard oil well.  We need to get serious about alternative fuels like solar, wind, ocean currents and hydrogen.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Alternative Fuels
    Guest (TR Reader) on 12/21/2005 at 2:06 PM
    Posts:
    1
    The world has become so dependant on oil that we are willing to go to any extent to get it.  Here we are destroying large areas of delicate ecosystems to get very expensive oil in a process that releases more pollution than a standard oil well.  We need to get serious about alternative fuels like solar, wind, ocean currents and hydrogen.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • there are alternatives to natural gas
      Guest (Mark Jones) on 01/11/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      Tar sand processing requires heat and hydrogen.  Total has announced plans to use nuclear energy to power this processing (Gauthier-Villars, David; "Total May Use Atomic Power at Oil-Sand Project", Wall Street Journal, 22 September 2005, page B6).  This comes with other concerns, but CO2 emissions aren't an issue.  If it comes to pass, it will represent the first use of nuclear energy in commercial petrochemical processing.  Oil sand processing is only one of the processes that could use heat derived from nuclear energy.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Alternative Fuels
    Guest (TR Reader) on 12/21/2005 at 2:06 PM
    Posts:
    1
    The world has become so dependant on oil that we are willing to go to any extent to get it.  Here we are destroying large areas of delicate ecosystems to get very expensive oil in a process that releases more pollution than a standard oil well.  We need to get serious about alternative fuels like solar, wind, ocean currents and hydrogen.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Extensive use of natural gas for processing
    Guest (Dave Hershberger) on 01/09/2006 at 11:32 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Great article and photos!

    Another interesting bit of information is that enormous amounts of natural gas (methane) are required during the processing of oil sand into light synthetic crude.  Natural gas is burned to generate heat during initial processing.  Later even more is used in the &quotupgrading&quot process (photo 7), because each place a long chain is broken, a new hydrogen must be attached to each broken end of the resulting chains.  This hydrogen comes most easily from methane.

    My point is that development of the tar sands depends on using more and more natural gas, which is itself becoming a scarce resource.

    In the long run, radical energy conservation is the only solution.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • oil sands
    Guest (BOB SCHULZ) on 03/02/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    NOTHING IS MENTIONED ABOUT THE LAND RECLAIMATION. How come? Nothing is mentioned about the new processes being developed. How come? The article is completley negative and one sided.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: oil sands
      markricelobe on 02/12/2007 at 4:20 PM
      Posts:
      1
      Have you been to the oil sands and seen the the reclamation areas?  Small acreages of grid-perfect rows of trees, founded on a mixture of gypsum and sand stone.  It's the most unnatural and nauseating practice I've ever had the misfortune of seeing.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Factual error in Bourzac article
    Guest (Roger Collins) on 03/02/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    The Cat 797 weighs nothing like the "500 metric tonnes unloaded" quoted in the article. A check of the Caterpillar site reveals the rig weighs around ....

    Operating Weight - Empty
    557372 lb / 252820 kg

    - which must be no more than 253 metric tonnes - or 249 tonnes.

    If we're going to have articles in this vein in future, is it too much to ask that writers and editors check their facts before publication?

    Here, see for yourself....

    http://www.cat.com/cda/layout?m=37840&x=7&location=drop
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Diesel Fuel From Tarsands
      Guest (Colin) on 03/04/2006 at 12:00 AM
      Posts:
      1
      If more small autos in the United States used diesel, there would be less need to cat-crack the fuel into gasoline. Producing heavier distilates would be a win/win.
      Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology