Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
« Back 1 [2]

November 10, 2005

Small Nuclear

Continued from page 1

By Kevin Bullis

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The power plant would be mostly buried underground for protection, and surrounded by a back-up passive air cooling system -- hot air rises out of the exhaust stack and cool air is pulled in through low vents. This system would run continuously, essentially wasting about one percent of the heat generated, yet ensuring that the reactor would cool off in the case of a problem.

The reactor is partially self-regulating. If the temperature rises, the structures containing the fuel expand, causing the fuel to spread out, and slowing down the frequency of the neutron collisions that create the nuclear reaction. This, in turn, causes the temperature to fall. These features, says Wade, should simplify the control of the plant and prevent meltdowns.

The lead will also serve as a safety measure. The fuel will be delivered inside the lead in a solid form, to be melted on site. When this module is removed and replaced after thirty years, the lead will cool off -- now encasing the used fuel. This can be returned to a central facility for reprocessing, after which almost all of the spent fuel can be reused, says Wade.

On the downside, building small reactors means losing out on the economy of scale that has driven a trend toward bigger and bigger reactors, says Wade. He hopes to make up for this by creating ways to mass-produce the reactors in modules that can be quickly assembled on site.

For Wade, small reactors are part of a vision for large-scale changes. "What we're trying to do is not only change the technology, but also exploit it, by changing the infrastructures. You can ship thirty years of energy with a single core loading, to provide energy security for a country without the need to install the infrastructure [for processing the fuel] right on its own territory." ElBaradei says designs such as the one developed at Argonne could actually "reduce access to sensitive nuclear material" if countries agreed to share fuel facilities. "We cannot afford to have every country sitting on an enrichment factory or reprocessing facility," he says. If a country with such a facility begins to feel threatened, it "would be able to develop nuclear weapons within a matter of months."

"We who live in the nuclear age are approaching a crossroads, a moment of truth," ElBaradei told the audience at MIT. "Will this technology continue to be harnessed as a servant of development? Or will we become the victim of its destructive power?" For now, he says, "the benefits of nuclear energy are needed more than ever."

« Back 1 [2]

Comments

  • Space applications
    Guest (CHAZBRO (From the Mars Society)) on 11/10/2005 at 7:26 AM
    Posts:
    1
    It appears that that a reactor derived from the technology described herein would be suitable for powersources in space for lunar basas and manned deep space probes. Has anyone explored this possibility?
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Space applications
    Guest (CHAZBRO (From the Mars Society)) on 11/10/2005 at 7:26 AM
    Posts:
    1
    It appears that that a reactor derived from the technology described herein would be suitable for powersources in space for lunar basas and manned deep space probes. Has anyone explored this possibility?
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • small nuc plants
    Guest (guven yalcintas) on 11/10/2005 at 12:09 PM
    Posts:
    1
    I think it is an excellent idea, but Nuclear plant is a very complex system that requires number of groups with diferent expertise such as engineers, health physics people, management, power etc.  To accomodate all these needs even as a group of reactors still requires that small country to spend a huge effort to build.  Good as a dream, but reality requires much more.  I wish it was real.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • small nuc plants
    Guest (guven yalcintas) on 11/10/2005 at 12:09 PM
    Posts:
    1
    I think it is an excellent idea, but Nuclear plant is a very complex system that requires number of groups with diferent expertise such as engineers, health physics people, management, power etc.  To accomodate all these needs even as a group of reactors still requires that small country to spend a huge effort to build.  Good as a dream, but reality requires much more.  I wish it was real.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • US nuke plants, a novel approach, Stewart Brand endorsed
    Guest (James Aach) on 11/11/2005 at 1:49 PM
    Posts:
    1
    In May 2005 in a Technology Review article, Stewart Brand called for a re-evaluation of nuclear power.  Mr. Brand has since endorsed a techno-thriller novel about the American nuclear power industry, written by a longtime nuclear engineer (me).  This book provides an entertaining and accurate portrait of the US nuclear industry today and how a nuclear accident would be handled.  It is called “Rad Decision”, and is found at RadDecision.blogspot.com.  There is no cost to readers.

    “Id like to see RAD DECISION widely read.” - - Stewart Brand.

    http://RadDecision.blogspot.com

    (sb quote used with permission)
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • US nuke plants, a novel approach, Stewart Brand endorsed
    Guest (James Aach) on 11/11/2005 at 1:49 PM
    Posts:
    1
    In May 2005 in a Technology Review article, Stewart Brand called for a re-evaluation of nuclear power.  Mr. Brand has since endorsed a techno-thriller novel about the American nuclear power industry, written by a longtime nuclear engineer (me).  This book provides an entertaining and accurate portrait of the US nuclear industry today and how a nuclear accident would be handled.  It is called “Rad Decision”, and is found at RadDecision.blogspot.com.  There is no cost to readers.

    “Id like to see RAD DECISION widely read.” - - Stewart Brand.

    http://RadDecision.blogspot.com

    (sb quote used with permission)
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • great concept, good article
    Guest (da) on 11/23/2005 at 10:55 AM
    Posts:
    1
    however, why does a technology magazine allow an article to start with the non-scientific comment that &quotCO2 emissions are a leading cause of global warming&quot?  while there is a clear but slight warming trend, the cause remains very much unclear.  placing that statement in an article in such a well-known and well-thought-of tech pub is a criminal misuse.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • great concept, good article
    Guest (da) on 11/23/2005 at 10:55 AM
    Posts:
    1
    however, why does a technology magazine allow an article to start with the non-scientific comment that &quotCO2 emissions are a leading cause of global warming&quot?  while there is a clear but slight warming trend, the cause remains very much unclear.  placing that statement in an article in such a well-known and well-thought-of tech pub is a criminal misuse.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Small Nuclear Reactors
    Hydrophilix on 12/10/2007 at 3:36 PM
    Posts:
    1
    We can remove the risk of weapons development under a screen of producing nuclear power (Iran, for instance) by having the US or the UN finance, sell, or even gift fueled and sealed nuclear reactors.  A sort of World Electrification Program. 
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology