Wireless light: Marin Soljacic (top) and colleagues used magnetic resonance coupling to power a 60-watt light bulb. Tuned to the same frequency, two 60-centimeter copper coils can transmit electricity over a distance of two meters, through the air and around an obstacle (bottom).
AMPS/MIT Libraries (top); Bryan Christie Design (bottom)

Business

TR10: Wireless Power

Physicist Marin Soljacic is working toward a world of wireless electricity.

  • March/April 2008
  • By Jennifer Chu

In the late 19th century, the realization that electricity could be coaxed to light up a bulb prompted a mad dash to determine the best way to distribute it. At the head of the pack was inventor Nikola Tesla, who had a grand scheme to beam elec­tricity around the world. Having difficulty imagining a vast infrastructure of wires extending into every city, building, and room, Tesla figured that wireless was the way to go. He drew up plans for a tower, about 57 meters tall, that he claimed would transmit power to points kilometers away, and even started to build one on Long Island. Though his team did some tests, funding ran out before the tower was completed. The promise of airborne power faded rapidly as the industrial world proved willing to wire up.

Then, a few years ago, Marin Soljačić, an assistant professor of physics at MIT, was dragged out of bed by the insistent beeping of a cell phone. "This one didn't want to stop until you plugged it in for charging," says Soljačić. In his exhausted state, he wished the phone would just begin charging itself as soon as it was brought into the house.

So Soljačić started searching for ways to transmit power wirelessly. Instead of pursuing a long-distance scheme like Tesla's, he decided to look for midrange power transmission methods that could charge--or even power--portabl­e devices such as cell phones, PDAs, and laptops. He considered using radio waves, which effectively send information through the air, but found that most of their energy would be lost in space. More-targeted methods like lasers require a clear line of sight--and could have harmful effects on anything in their way. So Soljačić sought a method that was both efficient--able to directly power receivers without dissipating energy to the surrounding­s--and safe.

He eventually landed on the phenome­non of resonant coupling, in which two objects tuned to the same frequency exchange energy strongly but interact only weakly with other objects. A classic example is a set of wine glasses, each filled to a different level so that it vibrates at a different sound frequency. If a singer hits a pitch that matches the frequency of one glass, the glass might absorb so much acoustic energy that it will shatter; the other glasses remain unaffected.

Soljačić found magnetic resonance a promising means of electricity transfer because magnetic fields travel freely through air yet have little effect on the environment or, at the appropriate frequencies, on living beings. Working with MIT physics professors John Joannopoulos and Peter Fisher and three students, he devised a simple setup that wirelessly powered a 60-watt light bulb.

The researchers built two resonant copper coils and hung them from the ceiling, about two meters apart. When they plugged one coil into the wall, alternating current flowed through it, creating a magnetic field. The second coil, tuned to the same frequency and hooked to a light bulb, reso­nated with the magnetic field, generating an electric current that lit up the bulb--even with a thin wall between the coils.

Print

Related Articles

Charge Your Phone (and Your Car) from Afar

Charging systems that send power farther through the air will soon be on sale.

Intel's Wireless Power Play

A research project cuts the electric cord, wirelessly charging an electronic device.

Recharging Gadgets Wirelessly

A metal pad that can recharge devices placed on top of it has come to market.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

drthompson

4 Comments

  • 1456 Days Ago
  • 02/19/2008

Magnetic Resonance

I worked for Telex Communications back in the late 90's, we did a similar thing using magnetic resonance for a short range wireless headset.  It was what I thought the precursor to bluetooth. It worked but was a power hog and while we made some products they never really caught on.  We worked with a Boston Company, Aura (http://www.auracomm.com/) who made a chipset for that, probably could do the same with power. 

Reply

Namdac

2 Comments

  • 1270 Days Ago
  • 08/23/2008

Re: Magnetic Resonance

Let's look at the fact that what Tesla was actually doing was tapping into the "Natural Grid". Think about this Teslas idea of AC came when times were simpler. We still use this today...the electric motor, for without we would be in the dark. Tesla was tapping into the natural electricity of the earth itself.

Reply

scarhawk

8 Comments

  • 963 Days Ago
  • 06/26/2009

Re: Magnetic Resonance

No he wasn't.  Tesla built generators - motors moved by non-electrical means which convert that mechanical energy to electrical energy.  In that day the mechanical energy was coal-powered steam and in many cases today still is.  What "natural grid" you're referring to is a complete mystery.

Reply

Namdac

2 Comments

  • 725 Days Ago
  • 02/19/2010

Re: Magnetic Resonance

Ha, thats rich...obviously someone needs to either study more on the subject matter or visit the Patented Library. Nikola Tesla invented AC technology which at that time was pretty impresive considering how much adversity with Edison. Edison if you have read ALL of the stories and books regarding early electrical principals and how much of a cash cow it was...he did not want the competision. Tesla wanted to make the power free to all. JP Morgan had his hand in Westinghouse which Tesla was working with. Both Westinghouse and Morgan could not let the idea of free electricity be obtained. They both would lose Billions in revenue. Tesla signed over his portion of westinghouse to westinghouse so he would not lose the company.
Tesla went out west to Colorado Springs lab and started working on wireless transmission of power. Marconni studied teslas ideas and came up with wireless communication.
Look at it in this light...The Earth has a magnetic field that is generated by rotation of the Earth(proven) much like that of a AC motor same pricipal much larger scale. Lightning, static electricity are all natural occurances are for the most part AC. Stored in the Ionoshpere.
While Tesla was in Colorado he worked on that very concept. Power companies would lose Billions if wireless power transmission of power actually comes to light. The person that finally comes up with the technology as easy as it is...would become the wealthiest person on the planet. Saving our planet as well.

Reply

cet

1 Comment

  • 337 Days Ago
  • 03/14/2011

Re: Magnetic Resonance

I am not a technical person, but am interested in knowing how I can support the creation a World Wireless System for the distribution of electricity. 

I would appreciate any info you could give me.

Thank you.

Reply

DanDMan

1 Comment

  • 125 Days Ago
  • 10/12/2011

Re: Magnetic Resonance

Man, I cant help but laugh at these doctor big school name types.  I mean come on! I can light a 60 watt light bulb at 400 feet and use only 61 watts at the source, using Ideas written by Tesla, but I guess I don't count as I the only listen to people with their own piece of paper. Perhaps some day real science will be used. In the mean time we are stuck with unread, greed driven stupidity.

Reply

montebello

1 Comment

  • 356 Days Ago
  • 02/23/2011

Re: Magnetic Resonance

It seems wireless charging is getting more and more common, today I read a press release about a Dutch company that is going to launch a wireless charger called GETPOWERPAD that looks great! It's dedicated for iPhone 3 and 4 users. I think i will buy one!

www.getpowerpad.com

Reply

Advertisement

bseddon

2 Comments

  • 1454 Days Ago
  • 02/21/2008

Exciting research for 2008 or products in user testing since 2006

As I untangle the mass of wire emmanating from under my desk its clear that the availability of wireless power will be great. However as far a powering small devices goes your MIT colleague has some catching up to do: http://www.splashpower.com/

Reply

GaryB

119 Comments

  • 1451 Days Ago
  • 02/24/2008

Re: Exciting research for 2008 or products in user testing since 2006

splashpower is based on inductive charging such as used by almost all electric toothbrushes now.  It works, but is much more limited than what the article describes: Charging within range of a transmitter. What the article describes would be much more flexible and useful than having to put an object in contact with a charging surface (though that's also useful, just less useful).

There might be some concerns with EM radiation ... but in the article this is tuned resonance, presumably not tuned for human flesh ... and I never quite believe/believed that non-ionizing radiation (EM) can have an effect on the body short of a hugely powerful field since it sort of lacks a cause (cancer by scary magic). 

As far as I know most meta-studies end up debunking EM as a cancer risk such as living close to high power lines -- no cancer risk. 

Reply

pradeepa.gn

1 Comment

  • 1418 Days Ago
  • 03/28/2008

wireless power transmission

iam studying in engineering,electronics and communication,i want repoprt on wireless power transmission,please anyone in this blog send to my e-mail.e-mail address-Pradeepa.gn@gmail.com.

Reply

msacooke

2 Comments

  • 1223 Days Ago
  • 10/09/2008

Re: wireless power transmission

There have been some interesting projects concerning wireless power. I proposed an architecture to utilize this technology on a large scale in "A Cellular Wireless Power System Architecture" PhD Dissertation at NC A&T State University in Greensboro, NC. I think you would find it interesting.

Reply

rusticyeti

3 Comments

  • 606 Days Ago
  • 06/18/2010

Re: wireless power transmission

I would like to read that paper. Can you send it to my e-mail (alexlwlondon@gmail.com) or post it on a blog and comment on it here? :)
Thanks.
Alex

Reply

scarhawk

8 Comments

  • 962 Days Ago
  • 06/27/2009

Re: Exciting research for 2008 or products in user testing since 2006

Moving to this "wireless" power will not get rid of the wire underneath your desk.  You'll still have a wall adapter with a wire running to the dock.

The only thing this system replaces is the physical metal connector on the dock.  Power falls off with the cube of distance, so moving the device more than a few inches from the dock effectively reduces the power available to the device to nothing.

Meanwhile the wall adapter will have to get (much) bigger to make up for the efficiency loss across the wireless connection.  At 50% efficiency that means twice the power needed.  The product will get bigger and more expensive, it'll be more expensive to recharge, and the box will get heavier and more expensive to ship.

All this so you can set your cellphone on a 6x6" pad instead of docking it in a cradle?  Is it really saving people that much effort?

Reply

danimalia

4 Comments

  • 1453 Days Ago
  • 02/22/2008

This is new? No its not.

Tesla did this decades ago. Why is this one of the most exciting new technologies of 2008 when its not even new?

Its a very wasteful way to charge things up, besides. Also, who wants to share a room with a device constantly zapping you with powerful EM waves? I dont.

Reply

Advertisement

falcon

1 Comment

  • 1451 Days Ago
  • 02/24/2008

cancer factor

Wireless electricity is old technology and ignored due to cancer association with the electromagnetic waves.

Reply

rusticyeti

3 Comments

  • 606 Days Ago
  • 06/18/2010

Re: cancer factor

Perhaps the prospect of cancer. Where is there evidence saying that wireless electromagnetic waves cause cancer?

Reply

ofoehr

1 Comment

  • 1449 Days Ago
  • 02/26/2008

Can our planet afford another technology with 30%-50% LOSS?

Does anyone really believe we should push out technology that reduces the efficiency of electronic gadgets even further? If the average device uses 3 Watts and we have 3 billion devices, even an optimistic 30% loss in efficiency will cause the equivalent of more than 50 million tons of carbon dioxide annually - all just because we are too lazy and lethargic to plug it in?

Reply

rabber

5 Comments

  • 1449 Days Ago
  • 02/26/2008

Re: Can our planet afford another technology with 30%-50% LOSS?

I agree that this could be a concern. Howeve,r it may also reduce electricity usage, depending upon how it is implemented. Currently I have a charger for my phone that is plugged in all the time. I only have the phone plugged in overnight. Suppose that I only draw electricity from this wireless charger when the cell phone needs the power and is in range. Would that be more (or less) efficient than having a charger plugged in 24/7?

Reply

MakeSense

99 Comments

  • 1402 Days Ago
  • 04/13/2008

Re: Can our planet afford another technology with 30%-50% LOSS?

The insidious problem is that people would waste energy and not feel it much on their electric bills. It would appeal to consumers who love their gadgets and believe weakly in their own abilities to place those gadgets on rechargers. If this technology has a use, it may well benefit the military or NASA, but I'd hate to see it take off for consumer electronics. The added costs to cellphones and such along with a perceived health risk might make it a nonstarter anyways.

Reply

pierrestm

1 Comment

  • 1449 Days Ago
  • 02/26/2008

Wireless Power Transmission efficiency

Wireless Power Transmission had been achieved by Nikola Tesla at the early beginning of the 1890's to the 1930's in USA as well as in Canada... but this technology had been worked out more then 10 years ago by the German physicist Dr Konstantin Meyl from Germany who made many lectures in Germany as well as in United States few years ago. He demonstrated the principles of the Wireless Transmission of Power based on Nikola Tesla early work (patents) and demonstrated as well the efficiency of this system which was very more efficient then what it is claiming here (more or less than 50%)...

Here's his website for more details about his work. Some books, videos and working kits are available for demonstrations purposes...
http://www.meyl.eu/go/index.php?dir=10_Home&page=1&sublevel=0
     

Reply

wcfloyd

13 Comments

  • 1449 Days Ago
  • 02/26/2008

wireless power

This would be ideal to power the "Bionic Contact Lens" I saw in a video on yahoo's home page today. They say lens is embedded with electronics that could conceivably provide zoom and night vision. Sorry, no x-ray or heat vision! :-) Still developmental, but a power source in your shirt pocket to power the contact lenses seems reasonable.

Reply

Advertisement

jeeves

1 Comment

  • 1440 Days Ago
  • 03/06/2008

re: eCoupled technology

There's a Michigan-based company, Fulton Innovation, that's working with some pretty big names to get this technology into more than small device applications and charging pad solutions. In fact, they showed a wirelessly charged laptop at CES this year with the supporting infrastructure (a desk with a charging coil built in). They can also do high power applications, and all with very high efficiency. The technology is call eCoupled. You can see it at www.ecoupled.com.

Reply

b4b2

9 Comments

  • 1440 Days Ago
  • 03/06/2008

Wireless Cars?

There are some interesting application I'd like to see some day.

Bury a coil under parking spots (maybe hang them up somewhere?) and charge your car while you shop!

Just some thoughts.

Reply

rusticyeti

3 Comments

  • 606 Days Ago
  • 06/18/2010

Re: Wireless Cars?

Probably right-on-the-mark thoughts, too.

Reply

optikos

1 Comment

  • 1434 Days Ago
  • 03/12/2008

What an incredible waste of electrical generating capacity; what an incredible increase to my monthly electric bill

Do the math, please.  At 33% to 50% radiated loss in all the wrong directions, this corresponds to 1.5 to 2 times as many power plants and 1.5 to 2 times the monthly electric bill.

Once this technology is widely deployed, imagine building 1.5 to 2 times as many COAL-fired or NUCLEAR-powered power-generating plants.  (Literally, pick your poison, please.)  Perhaps I can interest you in having a nuclear or coal power plant built literally across the street from your house?  They are really beatiful additions to your neighborhood!

Also my $200 to $300 per month electric bill is not high enough.  I would like it to be 1.5 to 2 times bigger per month.  Oh yeah!  $300 to $600 per month!  That's what we all want!

And for those of you who say only toothbrushes and cell phones will have this technology, think again.  Once it is cool to have wireless power, everything that takes less power than an oven or an air conditioner will be powered wirelessly.  It will get to where premium-priced wireless-powered products dominate over low-end wire-powered because they will command higher profit margins for the manufacturer and will bestow not only coolness but also be a status symbol of how large of a monthly electric bill the buyer can afford.  Therefore, wasted electricity that is raditated in all the wrong directions due to wireless-powered products will be a major percentage of the monthly electric bill and a major cause of building more electricity-generating plants.

Reply

BenAthar

1 Comment

  • 1270 Days Ago
  • 08/23/2008

Re: What an incredible waste of electrical generating capacity; what an incredible increase to my monthly electric bill

It's sad to think that there are way too many people out there thinking of the negative side of things and helping the lazy an lethargic people out there, instead of trying to help find a better solution. If you are going to complain and be one of those skeptics and doomsayers about RF, Cancer risks and the like, then go sit in a dark lit room away from everyone else who is at least attempting to find a better solution than trying to stop and add to the problem by not doing anything at all!

If this could be done and still have less loss, then I could see this as an ideal way to use electricity. We are now (the US in particular) are starting to use more solar, wind and thermal means to power our homes. It can be done, but the technology and the people trying to come up with the ideas and ways to make such things a reality are limited. Time is what is helping make such things a reality. Even though it might be at least 100 years later, the thought is still working and continuing.

Reply

kylerussell

1 Comment

  • 173 Days Ago
  • 08/25/2011

Re: What an incredible waste of electrical generating capacity; what an incredible increase to my monthly electric bill

It just seems that there is a lot of sarcastic anger floating through some of these comments that doesn't acknowledge the multiple aspects of such a leap to wirelessly transmitted power.  I agree that the 30-50% loss could be an issue, but only if it was not being addressed with alternate power sources, thus making the 1.5 or 2 times as many coal and nuclear power plants everywhere a knee-jerk statement that though meant to be clever and intellectual, comes across as rather contrived and unnecessarily hostile.  A group of people that would rather spend their time coming up with solutions to technological issues rather than playing with power lines should also not be classified as "lazy".  Tesla was not lazy, but rather innovative and socially conscious, and I assure you he would not settle for cables, power lines, computer cords, or any other physical tethering of objects to each other for the sake of power transfer.
Wireless power needs to be explored and perfected to the fullest alongside newer, cleaner, and more efficient energy producing methods, and with that we could move toward freedom of transportation and costless, natural energy consumption.

Reply

sculptor

19 Comments

  • 1423 Days Ago
  • 03/23/2008

TV trend

This fits perfectly with the trend for wireless flat screen HDTVs.

Reply

Advertisement

b.dutta.ee

1 Comment

  • 1415 Days Ago
  • 03/31/2008

long way to go...

Can't understand why there is all the discussion
about powering all the home devices including tvs, bulbs and other fixed items wirelessly with a
such a inefficient method (particularly when the energy prices are going up!). Mobile phones and
defence applications seem realistic.
Anyways I feel that the brains at MIT should focus
more on solving more complex technical issues then revisitng old known ones (which anyways many companies are doing), unless of course they are making some revolutionary new approach which is kept unpublished.

Reply

kfakfa

1 Comment

  • 1404 Days Ago
  • 04/11/2008

Safety of rf exposure?

Large rf magnetic fields can cause induced currents and electrical fields in any conductors near the transmitter. The effect of these induced fields and currents can be anything from sparking and local heating of dielectric materials to severe burns if the configuration of the conductors is not well controlled.

I'd like to see some specific absorption rate estimations for the heating effects of biological tissues caused by the rf magnetic fields involved. In MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) an rf field strength of only 30 microteslas at 64 MHz might be large enough to be of concern even when pulsed at 5 % duty cycle. I'd be very careful in the vicinity of a transmission coil putting out a continuous rf field of 100 microteslas.

The biological effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields at rf frequencies is a hot subject these days. The national limits of rf magnetic fields and specific absorption rates are quite low for the general population. The safety concerns should be taken into account already by the scientists involved with the project in the test laboratory.

Reply

CokeClassic21

1 Comment

  • 1359 Days Ago
  • 05/26/2008

Nikola Tesla...

When I see this, it reminds me of something that is somewhat of a large deal when talking about energy transmission.  Isn't just about everything that Nikola Tesla was about, wireless energy via resonant frequencies, its interesting that people are kind of catching on today... 100 years later... 

Reply

scarhawk

8 Comments

  • 962 Days Ago
  • 06/27/2009

Re: Nikola Tesla...

The same physical laws that made it impractical 100 years ago make it impractical today.  Power falls off with the cube of distance and no amount of R&D can change that.

There's nothing to catch onto.  It's a cool idea, but it doesn't work in a way that's useful and affordable.

Reply

Laverne

1 Comment

  • 1302 Days Ago
  • 07/22/2008

Wireless wired

Most of what I see on these blogs are comments and ideas that require a source that uses physical energy sources, i.e., coal, gas, for powering AC which is in turn used to create wireless energy.
I want to hear more from those who are experimenting with the electomagnetic field that surrounds the earth and getting energy directly from that!  No coal or gas fired plants, no high AC electric bills, etc.  We should be able to make a receiver for that type of energy, on a small enough scale for powering homes, businesses, vehicles, and more!  Even the lightning rods on our homes powered oldtime crystal radio sets so that we could hear radio transmisions.
Health issues???  I am experienced in the total exhaustion in the morning caused by sleeping in the magnetic field created by a waterbed heater...I vowed never to do that again! This made me realize how our bodies are affected by our government approved electrical wiring in our homes.  I always feel more alive when there's no electrical current flowing and creating magnetic fields that hinder my Na+, Cl-, K+, etc. ions in my muscles.  So, if you want to be more energetic, turn the lights, TV, refrigerator, air conditioning OFF. :)  Now, I know that that is drastic, but try it!  You'll like it.  :)
Meanwhile, why use scare tactics about Tesla's energy transmissions when he used HF anyway??  You need a higher frequency than RF (radio frequency) to get more power per wave.  Go there, and let me know what happens.  Who knows, maybe infrared or planetary / solar frequencies may be the next electric source?  Free, clean, safe...they are coming our way no matter what, so we might as well use it!
Laverne

Reply

bjd23

1 Comment

  • 973 Days Ago
  • 06/16/2009

Re: Wireless wired

... high frequency and much, much higher voltages which run cooler and permit smaller devices/appliances than our very low 60 hertz apparently where the key ingredients that Tesla and even Moray discussed and apparently got to work.  Smaller wires, more windings, spark gap generators, even cosmic ray energies. The possibilities are there. 

Reply

kvenvold

1 Comment

  • 1302 Days Ago
  • 07/22/2008

Is it real!

Wireless power has been a goal of mine for many years. I have developed products that will trickle charge a battery from the RF communications it receives to extend the useful battery life between charges. This is free energy because it is available anyway.  However to just power a product from any wireless source is very inefficient.

I was recently laid off from my present job and had the opportunity to interview with the people at WiTricity. This experience revived my interest in solving the wireless power issue. Since I have time to tinker, I have recently developed a prototype wireless flat screen TV. My previous job was designing flat screens for media applications, so I had the parts.

I am now working on making it more efficient, I have found that increasing the frequency of the transmission increases the length of transmission as well as the efficiency. I have a ways to go, but it’s a start and it works. As for the health issues, short range transmissions are harmless.
Health issues with longer range transmissions will have to be determined.

Reply

Advertisement

Stuball

1 Comment

  • 1292 Days Ago
  • 08/01/2008

Re: Is it real!

Wireless transmission of power can efficiently be achieved in a few ways. High efficiency LEDs or arrayed laser diodes could be aimed at high efficiency photovoltaic cells. Optimum efficiency could be reached if the LEDs would emmit light at the wavelenth otimum cell conversion efficiency. This may best done via infrared. Microwaves have been used for efficient transmission of power via a rectrenna. A rectenna is basically an array smiple tuned dipole antenna and a half or full wave rectifier. I could even envision a heat based engine run from laser or microwave beams. Of course there is the resonant transfer of power of which tesla coils and the new low power transfer are examples. However I suspect these will have very limited range, efficiency and power transfer capability. I would like to explore these possibilities especially for the prospect of running an elecrtic car with limitless range.

Reply

msacooke

2 Comments

  • 1223 Days Ago
  • 10/09/2008

Re: Is it real!

How about a cellular system. Similar to what cell phone towers do. By handing off the load (car, etc.) during transit the issue of transmission distance can be diffused. Not to mention the reliability inherent with redundancy.

Reply

mhydeis

1 Comment

  • 1270 Days Ago
  • 08/23/2008

pacemakers/implanted cardiac devices

MRI?  No Thanks.  That could interfere with my device and could probably affect my heart rhythm.  I've been told that for medical testing purposes that I should not undergo MRI tests.

Reply

Guest (Gagolist2)

  • 1186 Days Ago
  • 11/15/2008

Iranian guy has set a Record of 20 meters

When i saw this invention in this site i was wondered who made this. but as an IRANIAN person i am proud to inform you all, that an Iranian Inventor had made a device that sends electricity more than 20 METERS!! that's a record that he had brake it. unfortunatly because his country isn't a superpower his invention had no reflection in the news. i just wanted to Inform his name here: Mohammad Reza Naad Ali Nejad. His invention has registered in number:52546 in IRAN.

Reply

andiaswad

1 Comment

  • 1150 Days Ago
  • 12/21/2008

MIT Scolarship

I am a student in ITB(Bandung Institute of Technology-Indonesia). In this forum, I want get some help from all of you to finish my college in my university. By the way, i interested to studying in MIT. Please, show me how to get a scholarship to get studying there.

Reply

CStroliaDavis

6 Comments

  • 1132 Days Ago
  • 01/08/2009

What about high capacity capacitors and batteries

I believe I've seen or read something about a group in Texas that is working on a high capacity, capacitor that would charge up in just a few seconds to minutes, but would then be able to provide power for hours.

I know it's not wireless, but it seems like it could be a step in the right direction.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Consumer-Driven Disruptions

More

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

IBM

Joule Unlimited

Amyris

Google

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement